harald at a-little-linux-box.at
Wed Jul 27 17:18:14 UTC 2011
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 07:04:40PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Harald Jenny schrieb am Wednesday, den 27. July 2011:
> > Hi Alex
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:50:18PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > Harald Jenny schrieb am Wednesday, den 27. July 2011:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:40:37PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > > > > 2011/7/25 kysiek <kysiek at poczta.fm>:
> > > > > > whether you plan to do amavisd ver 2.7.0?
> > > >
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I have CCed the developer's mailing list which is probably the best
> > > > > place to ask questions like these.
> > > >
> > > > I have a question concerning bugs already fixed in amavisd-new but not closed in the bugtracker: How do you prefer that they should be threated? Should they just be closed with the fixed version in bugtracker, should a new Closes line be appended to the latest changelog entry or should the changelog paragraph of the corresponding version be modified? I ask this because there does not seem to be any kind of official policy on this matter and I just want to make it right...
> > > Please drop a mail to xxxx-done@ and close the bug with a reasoning.
> > Ok so no further changelog action required correct?
> Yes, but if you know the exact version where the bug got fixed a "Version"
> Header would be nice.
More information about the Amavisd-new-debian-devel