[Babel-users] Babeld dirty routing table

[Juliusz Chroboczek]

> >> after a while dirty routes disappeared, it didn't seems deterministic
> >> how the problem appear, but heavy packets loss seems improve probability
> >> of problem

> > That's very strange.  What happens when you shut down babeld cleanly
> > (using a plain kill, not kill -1 or -9)?

> As you can see [0] babeld is killed with plain kill not -1 or -9 what
> happen is that the unreacheable routes remain in the table as i said in
> the other thread

Gioacchino, I strongly suspect we're mis-interpreting the results
here, something like interpreting Linux route cache as actual routes.

Unless the spurious routes cause a problem, I suggest you ignore this.

-- Juliusz