[Babel-users] SIGHUP shouldn't kill babeld

Charles N Wyble charles-lists at knownelement.com
Tue Sep 24 04:19:43 UTC 2013


Um. What is confusing about this? 

+1 for this proposal. 

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>> What about quitting on SIGHUP only if babeld is run on non-daemon
>mode?
>
>I'd find that confusing.  Other opinions?
>
>-- Juliusz
>
>_______________________________________________
>Babel-users mailing list
>Babel-users at lists.alioth.debian.org
>http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/babel-users/attachments/20130923/6f3486fe/attachment.html>


More information about the Babel-users mailing list