[Babel-users] the routing atomic update wet paint - because *I* care

Matthieu Boutier boutier at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Tue Apr 7 10:19:43 UTC 2015


>> I agree, but I would like to know how many packets we lose.  Since the
>> remove/insert happen in quick succession, I'd expect it to be very few.
…
> and the context switch and what little work it does alone - costs
> 80Mbits of forwarding,

What about putting multiple netlink messages in one datagram?
Will perhaps do that. :-)

Remark: error handling become more tricky -- but for just 2 messages it
should be fine.

Matthieu




More information about the Babel-users mailing list