[Babel-users] IPV6_SUBTREES vs policy routing

[Dave Taht]

I can confirm this patch does the right thing on x86_64, and that the
current kernels on the pi3 and pi2 now also support IPV6_SUBTREES
correctly.

The wifi on the pi3 *sucks rocks* in adhoc mode from a bufferbloat
perspective, even worse than the ath9k. It does support a usb ethernet
and a few other usb wifi chips, I'm going to try those - but as a
little quick and dirty test router the only problem I've had with
loading it up with 3 usb sticks and ethernet was in the power supply.
I currently have it successfully using an ethernet dongle, one usb
flash stick and one external wifi adaptor.

 I am told IPV6_SUBTREEs is now in the odroid c2 kernel tree, but they
have not put out a binary yet.

I am curious as to what the behavior should be for source specific ipv4?


On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Matthieu Boutier
<boutier at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>> Do you think this is serious enough to justify releasing 1.7.2?
>
> No, it only adds additional v6 rules: associated tables remains empty.
>
>> Matthieu, could you please tell me when the bug was introduced, so I can
>> put it in the changelog?
>
> ... so, it's quite unclear.  The symptoms appear between
>
>     c18e3b0a389fdbf5cc243b094ebb42e59139f035
>
> and
>
>     58dbd2f425a7dcdb58e5b6923bd7df309e233d79
>
> most probably at 72a6264355c0d0e98c48ca45c609c6d0288ec05c
>
> but the bug itself is probably introduced with the function (or its usage).
>
> Matthieu
>



-- 
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org