I would like to know that manet protocols based on layer-3 such babel (olsr or batmand) seem to be properly working with the nodes established with babel. On the other hand, the nodes such as PC or IP Camera not capable of supporting babel within the network can not be joined to the network? In general, layer-2 based mesh network has no issue about this one but it has some limitations such as scalability and delay of route changes due to the use of STP.<br>
<br>Any comments are very appreciated...<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:35 AM, mason <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:myongsu.choe@gmail.com">myongsu.choe@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Although I flushed all of the tables in a firewall as you recommended, but it still produces the same results, blocking.<br>
FYI, I only imposed "route redistribute" setting only at 172.16.1.121 node like <br>redistribute ip <a href="http://0.0.0.0/0" target="_blank">0.0.0.0/0</a> le 0 metric 128.<br>
<br>-<br><font color="#888888">mason</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Juliusz.Chroboczek@pps.jussieu.fr" target="_blank">Juliusz.Chroboczek@pps.jussieu.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div>> In addition, at Node2, I can get the following routing table. Especially,<br>
> routing table flag of 172.16.1.123 or 1010.1.123 has to be U not UGH. Is it<br>
> something wrong?<br>
<br>
</div>No, that's fine.<br>
<br>
Please disable all the firewalls on all of your nodes, and try again.<br>
<br>
iptables -F INPUT<br>
iptables -F OUTPUT<br>
iptables -F FORWARD<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Juliusz<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>