[Bash-completion-devel] Question on subversion completion

[David Paleino]

On Mon, 11 May 2009 15:44:49 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:

> Hi Bash-completion team + subversion maintainer

Hello,

> [..]
> Namely why is debian shipping with two different bash_completions for
> subversion? I have one from bash_completion v1:1.0-2 and one from
> subversion v1.5.6dfsg-1(determined via apt-file):

Because we had a subversion completion, but didn't check whether it was
complete or not. Thus we renamed it as _subversion.

> [..]
> On my system it seems that the "_subversion" file overrules the
> "subversion" (I only checked the _svn function, and assumed this
> precedence held for the other svn-commands).

AFAICT "_" should come before "s", so "subversion" should really overrule
"_subversion"... but I didn't really try this, so sorry if it happened the
opposite -- I'll fix it in the next Debian revision (and consequently upstream)

David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/bash-completion-devel/attachments/20090512/1f93420e/attachment.pgp>