From dfge567sf@hotmail.com Wed Jun 28 02:12:28 2006 From: dfge567sf@hotmail.com (dfge567sf@hotmail.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:12:28 +0900 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCPXdALSROMFkkTkFHRSgkSk54GyhC?= Message-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C69AA3.C326E250 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_000B_01C69AA3.C326E250" ------=_NextPart_001_000B_01C69AA3.C326E250 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit $B!A?7;~Be5U1g=u!A(B $B!Z(BPure$B!!(BJewelry$B![(B $B=w@-$,:n$k=w@-Cf?4$N:G9b$N=P0)$$$N>l$@$H<+Ii$7$F$*$j$^$9!#:#$^$G$N=P0)$$$N@.(B $B8yN($O(B75$B!s$rD6$(!"(B $B$?$/$5$s$N3'MM$+$i$*Ni$NO"Mm$rD:$$$F$*$j$^$9!#$3$l$+$i$bAGE($JNx$r$$$D$^$G$b(B $BB3$1$i$l$k$3$H$r4j$C$F$*$j$^$9!#(B http://awg.webchu.com/deai/?online $B!zBh0l$K=w@-$N3'MM$KAGE($J=P0)$$$r4j$C$F$*$j$^$9!#4{:'=w@-!"FH?H=w@-$K4X$o$i(B $B$:!"$$$D$^$G$bAGE($JNx$r$7$F$$$?$$$H;W$&$N$OEvA3$G$9!#$=$3$G!"CK@-$N3'MM$K(B $B%5!<%S%9NA!J%G!<%HBe!"%[%F%kBeEy!"=P0)$C$?$H$-$KH/@8$9$k$*6b!K$r$*;YJ'$$$7!"(B $B3d$j@Z$C$?8r:]$r$7$FD:$1$?$i%9%`!<%:$K=P0)$$$,$"$k$N$G$O$J$$$G$7$g$&$+!)(B http://awg.webchu.com/deai/?online $B!y=w@-$N3'MM$K$O?HJ,3NG'Ey$N?3::$,$4$6$$$^$9!#$4N;>5$/$@$5$$$^$;!#(B $B!zCK@-$N3'MM$X!z(B $B$4Mw$$$?$@$1$?$H;W$$$^$9$,!"!Z(BPure$B!!(BJewelry$B![$G$O=w@-$rCf?4$H$7$?=P0)$$$N>l(B $B$K$J$C$F$*$j$^$9!#(B $B=w@-$X$NM%$7$5!";W$$$d$jEy:GDc8B$N%^%J!<$r$*

=1B$B!A?7;~Be5U1g=3Du!A=1B(B

=1B$B!Z=1B(BPure=1B$B!!=1B(BJewelry=1B$B![=1B(B

=1B$B=3Dw@-$,:n$k=3Dw@-Cf?4$N:G9b$N=3DP0)$$$N>l$@$H<+Ii$7$F$*$j$= ^$9!#:#$^$G$N=3DP0)$$$N@.8yN($O=1B(B75=1B$B!s$rD6$(!"=1B(B

=1B$B$?$/$5$s$N3'MM$+$i$*Ni$NO"Mm$rD:$$$F$*$j$^$9!#$3$l$+$i$bAGE= ($JNx$r$$$D$^$G$bB3$1$i$l$k$3$H$r4j$C$F$*$j$^$9!#=1B(B

http://awg.webchu.com/deai/?online

=1B$B!zBh0l$K=3Dw@-$N3'MM$KAGE($J=3DP0)$$$r4j$C$F$*$j$^$9= !#4{:'=3Dw@-!"FH?H=3Dw@-$K4X$o$i$:!"$$$D$^$G$bAGE($JNx$r$7$F$$$?$$$H;W$&$= N$OEvA3$G$9!#$=3D$3$G!"CK@-$N3'MM$K%5!<%S%9NA!J%G!<%HBe!"%[%F%kBeEy!"=3DP= 0)$C$?$H$-$KH/@8$9$k$*6b!K$r$*;YJ'$$$7!"3d$j@Z$C$?8r:]$r$7$FD:$1$?$i%9%`!= <%:$K=3DP0)$$$,$"$k$N$G$O$J$$$G$7$g$&$+!)=1B(B

http://awg.webchu.com/deai/?online


=1B$B!y=3Dw@-$N3'MM$K$O?HJ,3NG'Ey$N?3::$,$4$6$$$^$9!#$4N;= >5$/$@$5$$$^$;!#=1B(B

=1B$B!zCK@-$N3'MM$X!z=1B(B
=1B$B$4Mw$$$?$@$1$?$H;W$$$^$9$,!"!Z=1B(BPure=1B$B!!=1B(BJ= ewelry=1B$B![$G$O=3Dw@-$rCf?4$H$7$?=3DP0)$$$N>l$K$J$C$F$*$j$^$9!#=1B(B=1B$B=3Dw@-$X$NM%$7$5!";W$$$d$jEy:GDc8B$N%^%J!<$r$*=1B$B!yCK@-$N3'MM$O?3::$O$"$j= $^$;$s!#EPO?%3!<%J!<$h$j%W%m%U%#!<%k$r$4EPO?$/$@$5$$$^$;!#=1B(B
http://awg.webchu.com/deai/?online

<= /DIV> ------=_NextPart_001_000B_01C69AA3.C326E250-- ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C69AA3.C326E250 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="h-01-1.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <000401c69a58$4e3c92f0$1964fea9@ibmad667634146> /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgAAZABkAAD/7AARRHVja3kAAQAEAAAAPwAA/+4ADkFkb2JlAGTAAAAAAf/b AIQABgQEBAQEBgQEBggFBQUICgcGBgcKCwkJCgkJCw4LDAwMDAsODA0NDg0NDBEREhIRERkYGBgZ HBwcHBwcHBwcHAEGBgYLCgsVDg4VFxMQExccHBwcHBwcHBwcHBwcHBwcHBwcHBwcHBwcHBwcHBwc HBwcHBwcHBwcHBwcHBwcHBwc/8AAEQgAeAB4AwERAAIRAQMRAf/EAaIAAAAHAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAA AAQFAwIGAQAHCAkKCwEAAgIDAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAQACAwQFBgcICQoLEAACAQMDAgQCBgcDBAIG AnMBAgMRBAAFIRIxQVEGE2EicYEUMpGhBxWxQiPBUtHhMxZi8CRygvElQzRTkqKyY3PCNUQnk6Oz NhdUZHTD0uIIJoMJChgZhJRFRqS0VtNVKBry4/PE1OT0ZXWFlaW1xdXl9WZ2hpamtsbW5vY3R1dn d4eXp7fH1+f3OEhYaHiImKi4yNjo+Ck5SVlpeYmZqbnJ2en5KjpKWmp6ipqqusra6voRAAICAQID BQUEBQYECAMDbQEAAhEDBCESMUEFURNhIgZxgZEyobHwFMHR4SNCFVJicvEzJDRDghaSUyWiY7LC B3PSNeJEgxdUkwgJChgZJjZFGidkdFU38qOzwygp0+PzhJSktMTU5PRldYWVpbXF1eX1RlZmdoaW prbG1ub2R1dnd4eXp7fH1+f3OEhYaHiImKi4yNjo+DlJWWl5iZmpucnZ6fkqOkpaanqKmqq6ytrq +v/aAAwDAQACEQMRAD8A9T4q7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq1hVvArsVbXpirWKuxV2KuxV2Kux VrvQYq3irsVdirWKuLAGnfG1cDXG1bxVtemKtYq7FXYq7FXYq0TTriqUeaNdj8vaRPqkp4xwAGRi jyhEqOTenHVnpXZV6mg2rgtIFteV/MEXmDRoNTQMolUP8Ubw/C4DJ8D7qSrCq1NGqO2FSKXyeZNM XUH0uN2mvIVDzQxKXKKTTcjavsDXDSeFYPMtst29vNE8MKN6YnkIHKSgO0dTJx3py49cEtkUUm1T z5Wf6noiRTTn9qVuRFeh4J0r/lMPfIGbOOO0qtofOmoXsd3qOsPBChqbSBFVT/ksanI3aZY66s00 y6mJEM55V+zXantkw10mQ98kULl6Yq1irsVdirsVWs3HqP8AP6N8VQt5fww20sqOGZFPELRjypsB 2qaeOApAY/DYm9hE2rOy3c3GVVmoyxugqvAqArca+48MCeSnqU81mgMk8STy25CvRxDuGRFkKMpP qNQV2Pw0BGNpG7HPy/8AMHISXcwtUN4Ga8jt4/RmguIWMbh1aQs0HqKyK7dW/m65MFvNO1nQdM81 +cYdcksjHdaJbPaRXMqlJgZg4bjxO3FXp8Q8duhwSQKZHpnlxLWH07O24oa8qALyPixPxMfnlZDE ypGvZ3luKsqDiOx6D5YhANr9Kk+tTJJGeQBPL2IyQYFP8mWC5emBWsVdirsVS3XtZt9B099Rugoh RkV3d/TRFY0LO5BCqMBKQGMnW4fNsEN1azLNp8wLQLC/KGTi4XkSv2l5Ar8QHhQYOJkYtaR5fsNL lW6hs1humPKW4jTisgpRhU7uCB45EzYcdJnLSWBYZ1DbkJMx9NA/deveh6dhhElu2N+Zbz1GBuWW C3T/AEeMozVbmKhSoJHBdjVh8LfiCd0gJppXku2FrEtuGtkMpumuoT6TTPIxd2oN+D8iKN0G3gcn TPiZbaWNrZRCK3jWNR3oKk+JPcnCC1ElfNMkQq5+I/Zr45AyUJHrF+LWBpJP7x/hUDuxyBlTMGkT 5a017OzEk397LViPnvlkSi05ySG16Yq1irsVaxVKPMOoaLBZz2+rvE6GEu9o7IXkj6E8GNSK7V6e ORkkBg+haroeu6TDc6NK97aR3Utr6cpEckTj4kh+AGPggoydj2p0yLKQNJtHcGK7EN4Vr6hFsxUo pQmvwrGBSmwoRUU8DgIaQEYssaskAFY3JMbluSkEkVqVOwIZi3amSAZgMKnv5Lm7vPUhIDIk62k6 cFKK5Wo/aUmSM9e1Adt8B5s3rdiClrHXc8F5EbgkgdD3Hh7ZaxKXa95hg0eEgfvLkj4UB2X3OUTl SYxtivl3X9R1C+uUvSXRt1enwrlIJtlwstt7aPVPRmmipHASQW35075eI2wKagUAywCkN4VbXpir WKuxVRurqKzgkuJ24RRKXdjU0A8AKk/xwWoeTeZNQtPMWrrbwQ/v72klvcTs1qHhWBz6QJNfjZ91 NN6V6HIEuRCGyX6Xoog83foqW6lCpaMbgcHMksqtFTmCPRpCX4oVWvUV2xWRZtq/lvWdTsUgkigu I15MYZOarLQVQyKHDDiwqPj79MLQXalqV8LWKyvLWXTmQW4iuYYmuSsq0LBm9Nl9I0Cs5Gy170OE FQUpivLHU9di0GdJBO6m4DmEokcJkBiMc4/dymirVaUHgOmRO5Z8wzjXJb+y0e5n0gIJ7WJ3RJAa MI1+yD0XpSuSlOg1yLxe98/W+qWNtqUMMqtfoGjhkVllJfpVWFae+Y5nZbMc9mc/l3omqravfaqx hin3W39ge+XQxsjJ6FHxUBVFFHYbDLeTUVStcCHYq2vTFWsVa74Usb856/ZaXZizkga/vL8NFa2M Ro8pAqxJBBVE+Eu1RQdTlZQGDaF5DghtvRv3lluJZWuZF9RXZLmVubESLFCSK8eShArU3BrgpuMq ekaPoNlpVtHFGhaVR8ckrGSQntyYmp98mAwMrTSg77/PEhg0Ur1J/wA++ClQVzpFpPKkpAT061CC lamvQbA1HWmEMgxv8xfNEekWCaTbKLi+1I+m0Q6JB/u1mofhqpoPnmPkNoISt5tK1/UbS/ns1T6h F6UIoK1PXoBsOwyOOCYimYWUrSqtFCinYZmgUGSZxinU1ORYSVBihvFW16Yq1iqjcS+khI6npgJS xXUmgmvPXKqZUX0xJT4iteVK9QK+GRUJpoVnVfrcoG390Pn3p4ZKIRI2U0vL61sUMl1KsSD9pjiZ AMhG0r0LzVp/mG7u4dMPqRWXEPIehZyaU+7K/GF0so0nUkiRqXdgqjcsTQAfPLbYPLPzD886lqLj y95RkMAJIvdSqRwA6LGR398olO2UUp8t+Uru8m9SSSW7lloZ7qdi7vQb1J7YYQ3ZvRNP8tR2aKAK lR1P3n8cuMUEpxBbmLbJWtotFI65FiV4xQ3ira9MVaxVK9eleK3DJsegORKQxkCh5yEUqN/CuRVO r7UbqKwaLTmVZVSiU3NadsTKmcQ85Fh5u8w3jadPyhnlDVlnOwHsBXMPKSWwEBQ8kJq/5e32oC9a K7huSEpyp8UZJBHX+Y4MIKJUWVGTzL5ycRp/oliftdVqP45mbkNZpN9O/L3R7MK8nKSQEEnsaffi IItkltaWtlFxhRY1WpJ6bZZELbbXNv6xtRKnrqvMwhhzCVpyK9aV75MxNXWy0at3MLUtQKBUsTsB gQpX2qabpSRS6ndQ2a3EqW8BndY/Umk+zGnIjkzdgN8njwzyXwgmhe3d3sowlLkLRmVsHYq2vTFW sVUbq2iu4jDKKq23y98iVY1eeW71FeOPjNC23WjU/HIptJH059NnW5VJBLE3IcnJXb26ZAlIkl+o 6nq+p3vNKrKduS1FB/seOEBFpv5f8lB5Fu9SJlbqFfen45OMQts2tWs4y1jbvH6lsqmSBWBZFevE so3AbiaV60yzwyBZGxUg1aIxti8c/OTy/cpaWVpFqmu6zqes3y/VrOPjPHBBCwlmlW0to4El9McQ PUrSvUdc6vsLUgykTHHCEI7nlZOwHFImr8nc9n5RZNRiIj8bm1DRfLWqWXmzT/NGheVtauZ4BcnU dV1i8tre5vZrlFjHqxPKeMUYqw4pWtBxyWo1UJYJYsmXGAa4YwiSIgb7GuZ9/wAU5M0TjMJTj0oA GhSd+YdJ/NXX9C13y/JFDC17JIVu1miWGSy4AC0tVAMoeYDi7z8QKmm3TD0ubQ4cuPICTXSjfF/O l026CNtOLJghKMu77+8/sRGv+TtY88ia71ezTRItFiX/AA1aXMyyMtykiytcXP1d3jUERLGAGeil j1OQ02ux6WhA8ZmfWQOnKo3v1vpvTHFqI4toni4vq93cLTnyt+YkfmW6tLaTSrzTEv4ZXtru59M2 88tuwDpA8bPzWlXV2C8lFRmJrOyzhiTxxlwkWBdi+++XcRvRac2k4ATYNfjdl+atxG16Yq1irR8R gKoa6uAqUB3yBVILuwkvXIArU5EBUVpvlyG2PqMo5nfpkwFTyONUWgAyQVB/XLGHWv0eYxFe3lub hJeIHrRwOEZeQ3Ji9Vdj/Nt3pfwSOPiv0g17r/XX2M+EmN9AkHnn8z/K/kB7eDWTPcXd2pkjs7OM SzekpoZGDMiqgodyd6GnTM7s/sjNq7MKER1OwvucjTaKea+HkO9ZaenqP5jQ6xJIDA2gK2kQkHlx nuA9zKykfujT0FHLrvTo1DO4aQwHPxfV8B6R5/xfill6cPD/AE9/lt+ll3rRBS5deKnizVFAa0oT 41zV8JcWkg86+fPL/kKwivdceRnunMdraWyCS4mZRUhFJUfDUVJIG48cztB2dl1cjGHTmTyDfp9L PMaikfm3zNZ+Y/IulXOnu9tY+br6x09mmHpSLbXM4Fwp3oCYkdetPA9MzNFpJYdTMS3lijKW2+4G 32034MJhlIPOAJ+I5K/nnzTofkr9H67rUUiWmnyPb6daWyKZJJZI+DSBSVCRQxclr35dPs8odnaP JqeLHA7y3kT3d3mSfxzqOmwyy3GPM8/x5s2qK075p3CXKQRUbg4q1iqlK5A2yJVCNF6hoe+RVEQW yoAT1GGMVV6ZIBXYVeb+ePON6mt2R8q2Yvn8vXqW+r6nMP8AQrb68Pq3pMVIkkeN5Y5JFj+yB8Xt 0HZ+hj4cvFPD4kbjH+I8PqvuANEC+fR2Om044TxmuIbDqa3Q+oeQPPA8zS6/NdWfmP8AScCWt1bs 8+k28YhZmQOkRumuIKOeUZb4j9qoyeLtLTeCMYEsfCbB2md/fw8J8+nRlHVYuDhoxr/O/VRZBa+T /M51W51q+19IrnUoobe6SxtFT0oLfkY4rZ5pJvTHKSQuzKxYmo40GYM9dh4BCOPaJJFy5k9ZUBfI V+lolqIcIiI8u8/eh5vy0l+pX3l601ZovLOrSyTXenT24ubgNO3OURXMj/AGb4qtGzKTUNWlLI9r DijkMP3sAAJA0NuVxA/SB5JGs3EiPWOvL7En138tvMya7a67o89pdW1ostrFpFr6mi8LaYpT/SoW uJGYcF9RgFLLsKdMytP2rhOI45iQJo8RrJuP6Joe7nTdi1cOAxldnr9W/u2TOT8u9a1WS11LV9Uh s7/RzE2hWWnwsdOsWiO5McjBrkug4Fm4UH2QuY47Ux4wYwgTGd8ZkfVK/MfT39fO2sauMbERYPO+ Z/UmMfkSbUpr2585al+npL2yl02OKO3W0gt7e4oZfTQPK3qSFVq5cnYUyg9oiAiMMeCpCXPiJI5X y2HdTWdSIgCA4aN96W6n5X8xaasvmPU/Nkyw6Rpk1uz21pDFO9sn75mkkma4X1jwH7xI16fZy/Fr MU6xxxC5zB3kavlsBW3kSWyGaEvSIc5d/X7NmReQNHl0DyXo2kXAK3FtZxC4BFCJnXnLX35scwe0 s4y6icxyMjXu6fY4+qyceSUh3p9xzCaFjQ8u/wCGAhXLCF74OFV/H3wgK7jhVLvMkmo2/l3VJ9HU yalFZXD2KAci1wsTGIAd6vTL9LGByxE/p4hfuvdswgGY4uVi2IwSaLb/AJPxNpDLPBeWEcUEikM8 l9dlY1Zj1MzXUlW78s2khkOvPHsRLf8Aqx3+XCPk5ZEjqPV0P2D9FM/45pHAdxxV3HFXccVdxxV3 HFUr17TZ9WS008AGykuY5b9iesMB9VUA7+pKqK3+TyzJ02UYyZfxVt7zt9gv4024piNnrWyagUzG anYq7FXYq7FXYq7FUni8n+V4NS/S0GmW8V4ZTceoicR65HEy8R8HqEftUrmVLXZjDgMjw1Xw7vd5 Nx1EzHhvZOMxWl2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2Kv/9k= ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C69AA3.C326E250-- From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Jun 2 09:48:24 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri Jun 2 09:51:14 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: severity of 368255 is important In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > severity 368255 important Bug#368255: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends (python-setuptools) Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From lyoncoupes at alicemail.fr Sun Jun 4 01:21:21 2006 From: lyoncoupes at alicemail.fr (Lyon Coupes) Date: Sun Jun 4 00:22:44 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] New message Message-ID: This is a text part of the message. It is shown for the users of old-style e-mail clients -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060604/761cdcaf/attachment.htm From owner at bugs.debian.org Mon Jun 5 13:03:29 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon Jun 5 13:18:54 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: closing 364365 In-Reply-To: <20060605104445.B8B67F13A9@colt.pezone.net> References: <20060605104445.B8B67F13A9@colt.pezone.net> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > close 364365 Bug#364365: cdbs: python-distutils.mk should remove .pyo files on clean 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Arnaud Fontaine > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From peter_e at gmx.net Mon Jun 5 16:05:52 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Mon Jun 5 16:26:18 2006 Subject: Bug#369335: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#369335: python-distutils.mk: does not honour DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION when calling dh_python In-Reply-To: <20060529074944.1839.37173.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060529074944.1839.37173.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <200606051805.53211.peter_e@gmx.net> Vincent Danjean wrote: > When using DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION to compile with a specific > python interpreter, dh_python is not called with this version. So its > call does not do anything (and no scripts are generated to compile > and remove optimized modules) I can't reproduce that. Can you show an example? From peter_e at gmx.net Mon Jun 5 17:36:28 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Mon Jun 5 17:37:58 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Shortening the uploaders list Message-ID: <200606051936.29140.peter_e@gmx.net> The following people have not done an upload of cdbs in the last two years and/or are known to have resigned from Debian: Colin Walters Jonas Smedegaard Chris Cheney Stefan Gybas Robert Millan Therefore, I'm inclined to drop them from the uploaders list. Everyone is of course welcome to join in this effort again, but I don't think it makes sense to present this long uploaders list to our users and fellow developers when these people are no longer really involved. From Vincent.Danjean at ens-lyon.org Mon Jun 5 18:45:40 2006 From: Vincent.Danjean at ens-lyon.org (Vincent Danjean) Date: Mon Jun 5 19:12:42 2006 Subject: Bug#369335: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#369335: python-distutils.mk: does not honour DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION when calling dh_python In-Reply-To: <200606051805.53211.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <20060529074944.1839.37173.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> <200606051805.53211.peter_e@gmx.net> Message-ID: <44847BD4.2020202@ens-lyon.org> Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Vincent Danjean wrote: >> When using DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION to compile with a specific >> python interpreter, dh_python is not called with this version. So its >> call does not do anything (and no scripts are generated to compile >> and remove optimized modules) > > I can't reproduce that. Can you show an example? Sure. Try with my package mercurial. apt-get source mercurial => get the source of the (current) 0.9-4 version and build it with debuild. No postinst/postrm will be generated. Then apply the patch in attachment (or get the diff of the 0.9-5 that apply this patch on my web page [1]) and try again to recompile the package. A correct postinst/postrm will be generated (but I need to workaround python-distutils.mk so that dh_python is called with -V 2.4) Best regards, Vincent [1]: http://dept-info.labri.fr/~danjean/deb.html#mercurial -------------- next part -------------- diff -u mercurial-0.9/debian/changelog mercurial-0.9/debian/changelog --- mercurial-0.9/debian/changelog +++ mercurial-0.9/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +mercurial (0.9-5) unstable; urgency=low + + * call dh_python with -V 2.4 argument + + -- Vincent Danjean Mon, 29 May 2006 09:18:53 +0200 + mercurial (0.9-4) unstable; urgency=low * [debian/copyright] add copyright for Debian packaging diff -u mercurial-0.9/debian/rules mercurial-0.9/debian/rules --- mercurial-0.9/debian/rules +++ mercurial-0.9/debian/rules @@ -1,9 +1,14 @@ #!/usr/bin/make -f # -*- mode: makefile; coding: utf-8 -*- +# including python-distutils BEFORE debhelper.mk ... +include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/python-distutils.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk -include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/python-distutils.mk + +# ... so that we can personnalize the call to dh_python +$(patsubst %,binary-install/%,$(DEB_PACKAGES)) :: binary-install/%: + dh_python -p$(cdbs_curpkg) -V 2.4 DEB_INSTALL_MANPAGES_mercurial=doc/hg.1 doc/hgmerge.1 doc/hgrc.5 DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION=2.4 From dr at jones.dk Mon Jun 5 22:49:49 2006 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Mon Jun 5 22:49:37 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Re: Shortening the uploaders list In-Reply-To: <200606051936.29140.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <200606051936.29140.peter_e@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20060606004949.e9535438.dr@jones.dk> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:36:28 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The following people have not done an upload of cdbs in the last two > years and/or are known to have resigned from Debian: > > Colin Walters > Jonas Smedegaard > Chris Cheney > Stefan Gybas > Robert Millan > > Therefore, I'm inclined to drop them from the uploaders list. > Everyone is of course welcome to join in this effort again, but I > don't think it makes sense to present this long uploaders list to our > users and fellow developers when these people are no longer really > involved. I agree with that reasoning. But alternativetively, I'd be happy to get a bit more active again in the development. My alioth username is "js". - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er n?r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060606/f952380e/attachment.pgp From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jun 6 00:03:53 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue Jun 6 00:13:49 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: setting package to cdbs, tagging 360589, tagging 369335 In-Reply-To: <20060605232747.8AD20F12BE@colt.pezone.net> References: <20060605232747.8AD20F12BE@colt.pezone.net> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > package cdbs Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cdbs > tags 360589 + pending Bug#360589: please add support for qmake Tags were: confirmed Tags added: pending > tags 369335 + pending Bug#369335: python-distutils.mk: does not honour DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION when calling dh_python Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From Vincent.Danjean at ens-lyon.org Tue Jun 6 08:45:43 2006 From: Vincent.Danjean at ens-lyon.org (Vincent Danjean) Date: Tue Jun 6 08:52:07 2006 Subject: Bug#369335: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#369335: python-distutils.mk: does not honour DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION when calling dh_python In-Reply-To: <44847BD4.2020202@ens-lyon.org> References: <20060529074944.1839.37173.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> <200606051805.53211.peter_e@gmx.net> <44847BD4.2020202@ens-lyon.org> Message-ID: <448540B7.6070406@ens-lyon.org> Vincent Danjean wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Vincent Danjean wrote: >>> When using DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION to compile with a specific >>> python interpreter, dh_python is not called with this version. So its >>> call does not do anything (and no scripts are generated to compile >>> and remove optimized modules) >> I can't reproduce that. Can you show an example? > > Sure. Try with my package mercurial. > apt-get source mercurial => get the source of the (current) 0.9-4 In fact, the current version in the archive is already 0.9-5. So you can revert the patch I gave you to come back to the 0.9-4 version and see the bug. Best regards, Vincent From lists at sumpfralle.de Tue Jun 6 12:22:19 2006 From: lists at sumpfralle.de (lars) Date: Tue Jun 6 12:24:04 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] python version specific configure settings Message-ID: <20060606142219.03458131@erker.wg> Hi, I am a co-maintainer of the clearsilver debian package. It uses cdbs as a packaging helper and already contains a python2.3-clearsilver package. I would like to add python2.4-clearsilver. The clearsilver source requires different configure settings to build python version specific binary files (--with-python=/usr/bin/python2.[34]). The (relevant part of the) current debian/rules file follows: include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --with-python=/usr/bin/python2.3 \ --with-perl=/usr/bin/perl \ --disable-ruby \ --disable-csharp \ --disable-apache \ --enable-gettext CFLAGS += -fPIC DEB_SHLIBDEPS_INCLUDE_perl-clearsilver := debian/perl-clearsilver/usr/lib/perl5 DEB_SHLIBDEPS_INCLUDE_python2.3-clearsilver := debian/python2.3-clearsilver/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages build/python2.3-clearsilver:: install -d debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages install -m644 $(DEB_BUILDDIR)/python/neo_cgi.so \ debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/neo_cgi.so binary-post-install/python2.3-clearsilver:: dh_movefiles --package=python2.3-clearsilver usr/lib/python2.3 Adding a [build|binary-post-install]/python2.4-clearsilver target and DEB_SHLIBDEPS_INCLUDE for python2.4 is easy, but how can I choose a specific configure setting for different packages? I tried the following: configure/python2.3-clearsilver:: DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS := --with-python=/usr/bin/python2.3 configure/python2.4-clearsilver:: DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS := --with-python=/usr/bin/python2.4 (and I removed the '--with-python' setting from DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS). But this did not reconfigure the sources for the different packages. How can I force cdbs to reconfigure the sources for every package with different settings? thanks for your time, Lars From dr at jones.dk Tue Jun 6 13:15:07 2006 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Tue Jun 6 13:15:03 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] python version specific configure settings In-Reply-To: <20060606142219.03458131@erker.wg> References: <20060606142219.03458131@erker.wg> Message-ID: <20060606151507.f36b1fc5.dr@jones.dk> Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060606/6dded6f6/attachment-0001.pgp From peter_e at gmx.net Tue Jun 6 13:53:38 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Tue Jun 6 13:54:07 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] python version specific configure settings In-Reply-To: <20060606151507.f36b1fc5.dr@jones.dk> References: <20060606142219.03458131@erker.wg> <20060606151507.f36b1fc5.dr@jones.dk> Message-ID: <200606061553.39375.peter_e@gmx.net> Am Dienstag, 6. Juni 2006 15:15 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > And to this list: As posted yesterday, I wouldn't mind getting write > access to the SVN repository and add stuff like this myself. I see that you are a project member on alioth, so you should have write access to the subversion repository. > But it has > been quite a while since I lost track of this project (due to switching > to using Alioth?), so may need some introduction of your current > working methods first. Like "only add tested code" or "add untested > code to trunk" or whatever.... Since we are currently doing rather frequent uploads (every two or three weeks), you should only add "release grade" code to the trunk. The multiple-flavor stuff is really cool and really important, but I think it should be done in a branch first. From dr at jones.dk Tue Jun 6 15:11:27 2006 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Tue Jun 6 15:13:11 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] python version specific configure settings In-Reply-To: <200606061553.39375.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <20060606142219.03458131@erker.wg> <20060606151507.f36b1fc5.dr@jones.dk> <200606061553.39375.peter_e@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20060606171127.e37b15b9.dr@jones.dk> On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:53:38 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Dienstag, 6. Juni 2006 15:15 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > > And to this list: As posted yesterday, I wouldn't mind getting write > > access to the SVN repository and add stuff like this myself. > > I see that you are a project member on alioth, so you should have > write access to the subversion repository. Ah, I missed that. Thanks! > > But it has > > been quite a while since I lost track of this project (due to > > switching to using Alioth?), so may need some introduction of your > > current working methods first. Like "only add tested code" or "add > > untested code to trunk" or whatever.... > > Since we are currently doing rather frequent uploads (every two or > three weeks), you should only add "release grade" code to the trunk. > The multiple-flavor stuff is really cool and really important, but I > think it should be done in a branch first. Ok. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er n?r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060606/486d9763/attachment.pgp From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jun 6 16:35:04 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue Jun 6 16:44:47 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#368255: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends (python-setuptools)) References: <200606061828.17935.petere@debian.org> <20060520212818.3869.87539.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:28:17 +0200 with message-id <200606061828.17935.petere@debian.org> and subject line Bug#368255: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends (python-setuptools) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz Subject: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends (python-setuptools) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:28:18 -0400 Size: 4091 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060606/98e40d51/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: Bug#368255: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends (python-setuptools) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:28:17 +0200 Size: 1410 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060606/98e40d51/attachment-0001.mht From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jun 6 16:35:07 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue Jun 6 16:49:57 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#369268: marked as done (debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs) References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <20060528191119.GA28435@laptop.lenk.info> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:25:00 +0200 with message-id <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> and subject line Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Micha Lenk Subject: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 21:11:19 +0200 Size: 5393 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060606/23505e29/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:25:00 +0200 Size: 2003 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060606/23505e29/attachment-0001.mht From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jun 6 19:48:45 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue Jun 6 19:54:45 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: tagging 202873, tagging 202873 In-Reply-To: <20060606190441.BC416F12B9@colt.pezone.net> References: <20060606190441.BC416F12B9@colt.pezone.net> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 202873 - moreinfo Bug#202873: cdbs: Please add support for dh-buildinfo Tags were: moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo > tags 202873 + wontfix Bug#202873: cdbs: Please add support for dh-buildinfo There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From dr at jones.dk Tue Jun 6 20:29:55 2006 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Tue Jun 6 20:54:59 2006 Subject: Bug#202873: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#202873: cdbs: Please add support for dh-buildinfo Message-ID: <20060606222955.21cee671.dr@jones.dk> Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060606/54aafda2/attachment-0001.pgp From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jun 6 20:48:47 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue Jun 6 20:55:19 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: tagging 311724, tagging 322401 In-Reply-To: <20060606203403.54C73F12B9@colt.pezone.net> References: <20060606203403.54C73F12B9@colt.pezone.net> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 311724 + confirmed Bug#311724: cdbs: Automatic update of debian/control, first paragraph, broken There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > tags 322401 + confirmed Bug#322401: cdbs: blindly adds build-depends that are already present There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From peter_e at gmx.net Tue Jun 6 21:01:43 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Tue Jun 6 21:02:08 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] python version specific configure settings In-Reply-To: <20060606151507.f36b1fc5.dr@jones.dk> References: <20060606142219.03458131@erker.wg> <20060606151507.f36b1fc5.dr@jones.dk> Message-ID: <200606062301.44058.peter_e@gmx.net> Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Attached is patches forking makefile.mk and friends to support > compiling separately for each binary package. Both actual files and > diffs against originals are including wheere applicable. See the most > recent official libgdchart-gd1 package in sid for an actual use of > the code. This code seems to assume that you can build the package outside of the source directory, which is typical of autotools-style packages. I'm wondering, however, whether this multiple-flavors should support other types of packages as well (e.g., what happens if you want to compile a java package in multiple flavors?) or whether this sort of solution is "good enough" for the moment. It certainly addresses a frequent need. From micha at lenk.info Tue Jun 6 20:55:33 2006 From: micha at lenk.info (Micha Lenk) Date: Tue Jun 6 21:42:48 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <20060528191119.GA28435@laptop.lenk.info> Message-ID: <4485EBC5.5020108@lenk.info> reopen 369268 thanks dear BTS Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I'm closing this bug because it's not a cdbs issue. I do not agree. I believe it's a cdbs issue, because cdbs behaves other than a simple user of cdbs (like me) would expect. The bug just makes the use of cdbs complicated. I believe cdbs should do the complicated thing - not the user. Otherwise cdbs tends to get pointless. I suggest to alter dh_installdocs for support of installing files listed in .docs in preference over the files specified on command line. Afterwards it should be fairly easy to fix this bug cleanly. Yours Micha From peter_e at gmx.net Tue Jun 6 21:10:36 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Tue Jun 6 21:48:08 2006 Subject: Bug#202873: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#202873: cdbs: Please add support for dh-buildinfo In-Reply-To: <20060606222955.21cee671.dr@jones.dk> References: <20060606222955.21cee671.dr@jones.dk> Message-ID: <200606062310.37541.peter_e@gmx.net> Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Attached is the cdbs snippet I already use and have used for some > time now. It invokes dh_buildinfo as late as possible (we only want > it for inclusion in actual packaging - not while iterating over other > build issues locally), and makes sure to only invoke once. I'm curious to know how this will actually create the stamp file that it seems to be hoping for: debian/stamp-buildinfo: dh_buildinfo I'm not really sure that a stamp file would be need at all, but maybe I'm not understanding the behavior of this tool correctly. My general feeling on dh-buildinfo is quite mixed. On the one hand, if people want it, we can provide it. (The fact that half the packages using it are maintained by you kind of skews the survey. :) ) On the other hand, the whole thing seems to be kind of unmaintained and doesn't even have a man page that explains the options. From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jun 6 21:34:02 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue Jun 6 21:50:18 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: Re: Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <4485EBC5.5020108@lenk.info> References: <4485EBC5.5020108@lenk.info> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 369268 Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks dear BTS Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From dr at jones.dk Tue Jun 6 21:54:02 2006 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Tue Jun 6 21:53:47 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] python version specific configure settings In-Reply-To: <200606062301.44058.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <20060606142219.03458131@erker.wg> <20060606151507.f36b1fc5.dr@jones.dk> <200606062301.44058.peter_e@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20060606235402.45ffde63.dr@jones.dk> On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:01:43 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Attached is patches forking makefile.mk and friends to support > > compiling separately for each binary package. Both actual files and > > diffs against originals are including wheere applicable. See the > > most recent official libgdchart-gd1 package in sid for an actual > > use of the code. > > This code seems to assume that you can build the package outside of > the source directory, which is typical of autotools-style packages. > I'm wondering, however, whether this multiple-flavors should support > other types of packages as well (e.g., what happens if you want to > compile a java package in multiple flavors?) or whether this sort of > solution is "good enough" for the moment. It certainly addresses a > frequent need. My aim for unofficial snippets has been to mess as little as possible with min snippets. The aim is of course the opposite within cdbs, and yes, I think it is possible to extend makefile.mk to support multiple compilations without breaking existing logic (doing it only when new options are set). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er n?r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060606/f54579c1/attachment.pgp From petere at debian.org Tue Jun 6 21:54:13 2006 From: petere at debian.org (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Tue Jun 6 22:24:10 2006 Subject: Bug#369268: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <4485EBC5.5020108@lenk.info> References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <4485EBC5.5020108@lenk.info> Message-ID: <200606062354.14456.petere@debian.org> Micha Lenk wrote: > I suggest to alter dh_installdocs for support of installing files > listed in .docs in preference over the files specified on > command line. Afterwards it should be fairly easy to fix this bug > cleanly. Great, but what does cdbs have to do with that? You'll have to talk to the debhelper maintainer to get that idea rejected. From micha at lenk.info Tue Jun 6 22:02:02 2006 From: micha at lenk.info (Micha Lenk) Date: Tue Jun 6 22:25:01 2006 Subject: Bug#369268: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <200606062354.14456.petere@debian.org> References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <4485EBC5.5020108@lenk.info> <200606062354.14456.petere@debian.org> Message-ID: <4485FB5A.1010503@lenk.info> Hello, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Micha Lenk wrote: >> I suggest to alter dh_installdocs for support of installing files >> listed in .docs in preference over the files specified on >> command line. Afterwards it should be fairly easy to fix this bug >> cleanly. > > Great, but what does cdbs have to do with that? You'll have to talk to > the debhelper maintainer to get that idea rejected. cdbs should make use of this new feature in order to close this bug. Of course it is possible to fix the bug otherwise. But simply closing the bug isn't fixing it. If you do not agree please consider to tag this bug wontfix instead of closing it. Yours Micha From petere at debian.org Tue Jun 6 22:50:33 2006 From: petere at debian.org (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Tue Jun 6 23:27:37 2006 Subject: Bug#369268: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <4485FB5A.1010503@lenk.info> References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <200606062354.14456.petere@debian.org> <4485FB5A.1010503@lenk.info> Message-ID: <200606070050.34334.petere@debian.org> Micha Lenk wrote: > cdbs should make use of this new feature in order to close this bug. In case this new behavior is implemented, cdbs would use it automatically. cdbs is just driving debhelper; it's not changing how it works. So there is nothing for cdbs to do about this. > Of course it is possible to fix the bug otherwise. How? > If you do not agree please consider to tag this bug wontfix instead > of closing it. That would presume that it's a bug in the first place, which I dispute. From micha at lenk.info Wed Jun 7 07:55:57 2006 From: micha at lenk.info (Micha Lenk) Date: Wed Jun 7 16:11:05 2006 Subject: Bug#369268: [Build-common-hackers] debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <200606070050.34334.petere@debian.org> References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <200606062354.14456.petere@debian.org> <4485FB5A.1010503@lenk.info> <200606070050.34334.petere@debian.org> Message-ID: <4486868D.4020705@lenk.info> Hello, Peter Eisentraut: >> Of course it is possible to fix the bug otherwise. > > How? cdbs could call dh_installdocs twice. The first time with files specified on commandline, the second time without. >> If you do not agree please consider to tag this bug wontfix instead >> of closing it. > > That would presume that it's a bug in the first place, which I dispute. Does cdbs do something wrong or not? I say, yes it's doing things wrong: cdbs should install files listed in .docs in preference over the files specified on command line to dh_installdocs. Not having talked about the reasons for this bug: Do you at least agree with this being a bug? Yours Micha From owner at bugs.debian.org Wed Jun 7 16:10:19 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Wed Jun 7 16:17:37 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: Re: Bug#370774: debhelper: dh_md5sums behaviour when DEBIAN/md5sums is already present In-Reply-To: <20060607093319.GA6441@esaurito.net> References: <20060607093319.GA6441@esaurito.net> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 370774 cdbs Bug#370774: debhelper: dh_md5sums behaviour when DEBIAN/md5sums is already present Bug reassigned from package `debhelper' to `cdbs'. > retitle 370774 cdbs: please add hooks after dh_md5sums or move it to binary-predeb Bug#370774: debhelper: dh_md5sums behaviour when DEBIAN/md5sums is already present Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From joeyh at debian.org Wed Jun 7 16:42:47 2006 From: joeyh at debian.org (Joey Hess) Date: Wed Jun 7 16:52:13 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#370774: debhelper: dh_md5sums behaviour when DEBIAN/md5sums is already present In-Reply-To: <20060607093319.GA6441@esaurito.net> References: <20060606182300.25995.4300.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> <20060606191725.GB14583@kitenet.net> <20060607093319.GA6441@esaurito.net> Message-ID: <20060607164247.GA9687@kitenet.net> Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > problem: dh_md5sums excludes unwanted files because of #242834 (find -regex etc) > my temporary (hackish) solution: append excluded files to DEBIAN/md5sums This suggests that you are using DH_ALWAYS_EXCLUDE for something that it probably wasn't designed to be used for, AFAICS. -- see shy jo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060607/23db939b/attachment.pgp From dr at jones.dk Wed Jun 7 17:47:44 2006 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Wed Jun 7 17:59:21 2006 Subject: Bug#202873: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#202873: cdbs: Please add support for dh-buildinfo In-Reply-To: <200606062310.37541.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <20060606222955.21cee671.dr@jones.dk> <200606062310.37541.peter_e@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20060607194744.7671809a.dr@jones.dk> On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:10:36 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Attached is the cdbs snippet I already use and have used for some > > time now. It invokes dh_buildinfo as late as possible (we only want > > it for inclusion in actual packaging - not while iterating over > > other build issues locally), and makes sure to only invoke once. > > I'm curious to know how this will actually create the stamp file that > it seems to be hoping for: > > debian/stamp-buildinfo: > dh_buildinfo > > I'm not really sure that a stamp file would be need at all, but maybe > I'm not understanding the behavior of this tool correctly. Ahem... You are right, of course: that the stamp is never created. Probably I used a custom make target with a (later?) package-specific rule depending on it, and then at some point moved to the current setup but forgot to remove the now unnecessary cleanup. I'll check, and simplify the snippet if that's the case. > My general feeling on dh-buildinfo is quite mixed. On the one hand, > if people want it, we can provide it. (The fact that half the > packages using it are maintained by you kind of skews the > survey. :) ) On the other hand, the whole thing seems to be kind of > unmaintained and doesn't even have a man page that explains the > options. Oh, I really thought (without investigating) that the too was more used than that. The reason I include it for all of my packages is for the theoretical case of getting a bugreport reproducable with the same exact binary package but not recompiles from current sid/etch/sarge: dh_buildinfo would then help find out which *exact* packages was on the system when that binary package was produced, helping to locate possible errors in dependency library packages. I have never actually needed the output of dh_buildinfo, but I still find it valuable - in case someone some day wants to investigate further. Hope that clarifies the usefulnes of dh-buildinfo. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er n?r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060607/e3fc34bd/attachment.pgp From petere at debian.org Wed Jun 7 22:06:51 2006 From: petere at debian.org (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Wed Jun 7 22:07:21 2006 Subject: Bug#369268: [Build-common-hackers] debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <4486868D.4020705@lenk.info> References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <200606070050.34334.petere@debian.org> <4486868D.4020705@lenk.info> Message-ID: <200606080006.52683.petere@debian.org> Micha Lenk wrote: > cdbs could call dh_installdocs twice. The first time with files > specified on commandline, the second time without. dh_installdocs is called once for each package. You can tell cdbs for each of those invocations exactly what you want. If you don't want stuff to appear on the command line for one invocation, just delete it. I explained earlier how to do that. Calling dh_installdocs twice would be redundant in this case because what you are actually looking for is the second invocation. > Does cdbs do something wrong or not? I say, yes it's doing things > wrong: cdbs should install files listed in .docs in > preference over the files specified on command line to > dh_installdocs. Again, this is not the doing of cdbs. cdbs calls debhelper. Debhelper decides what to install. If you think that files should take precedence over the command line, you'll have to talk to the debhelper maintainer. It's completely pointless to complain here because we are not controlling that. > Not having talked about the reasons for this bug: Do you at least > agree with this being a bug? Every tool known to man has the command line overriding settings in files. Debhelper does just that, so it's fine by me. But I'm not the debhelper maintainer, so I don't care. From petere at debian.org Wed Jun 7 22:06:51 2006 From: petere at debian.org (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Wed Jun 7 22:42:28 2006 Subject: Bug#369268: [Build-common-hackers] debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <4486868D.4020705@lenk.info> References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <200606070050.34334.petere@debian.org> <4486868D.4020705@lenk.info> Message-ID: <200606080006.52683.petere@debian.org> Micha Lenk wrote: > cdbs could call dh_installdocs twice. The first time with files > specified on commandline, the second time without. dh_installdocs is called once for each package. You can tell cdbs for each of those invocations exactly what you want. If you don't want stuff to appear on the command line for one invocation, just delete it. I explained earlier how to do that. Calling dh_installdocs twice would be redundant in this case because what you are actually looking for is the second invocation. > Does cdbs do something wrong or not? I say, yes it's doing things > wrong: cdbs should install files listed in .docs in > preference over the files specified on command line to > dh_installdocs. Again, this is not the doing of cdbs. cdbs calls debhelper. Debhelper decides what to install. If you think that files should take precedence over the command line, you'll have to talk to the debhelper maintainer. It's completely pointless to complain here because we are not controlling that. > Not having talked about the reasons for this bug: Do you at least > agree with this being a bug? Every tool known to man has the command line overriding settings in files. Debhelper does just that, so it's fine by me. But I'm not the debhelper maintainer, so I don't care. From micha at lenk.info Wed Jun 7 22:41:57 2006 From: micha at lenk.info (Micha Lenk) Date: Wed Jun 7 23:13:59 2006 Subject: Bug#369268: [Build-common-hackers] debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <200606080006.52683.petere@debian.org> References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <200606070050.34334.petere@debian.org> <4486868D.4020705@lenk.info> <200606080006.52683.petere@debian.org> Message-ID: <44875635.9010002@lenk.info> Hello, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Does cdbs do something wrong or not? I say, yes it's doing things >> wrong: cdbs should install files listed in .docs in >> preference over the files specified on command line to >> dh_installdocs. > > Again, this is not the doing of cdbs. cdbs calls debhelper. Debhelper > decides what to install. If you think that files should take > precedence over the command line, you'll have to talk to the debhelper > maintainer. It's completely pointless to complain here because we are > not controlling that. Actually I don't care whether dh_installdocs takes files in .docs files precedence over files specified on command line (at least for this bug report) or not. What I do care here is what cdbs is doing for packaging the documentation. I as packager selected a specific README to be packaged in and specified it in the corresponding file .docs, since I were expecting cdbs is using dh_installdocs (which it does). But my decision which README is to be installed in has been overruled without any comment by cdbs (why ever). I had to read the code of debhelper.mk in order to understand why the hell the *specific* README from .docs has been ignored by cdbs. That's odd, isn't it? The difference compared to dh_installdocs is, that I didn't configure cdbs (on my own) to install any docs. Neither in config files like the .docs files nor on command line (okay, pointless in debian/rules). I just created the .docs files because I trusted cdbs to make proper use of dh_installdocs. Thus I did expect it to do the same like I did without cdbs calling dh_installdocs in debian/rules on my own. Or shouldn't I have expected this? If I expected something wrong from cdbs - then maybe I'll think it all over. But then, where is this difference between dh_installdocs called from within cdbs compared to dh_installdocs called from pure debian/rules documented? Did I miss something? >> Not having talked about the reasons for this bug: Do you at least >> agree with this being a bug? > > Every tool known to man has the command line overriding settings in > files. Debhelper does just that, so it's fine by me. But I'm not the > debhelper maintainer, so I don't care. I totally agree that it's fine for dh_installdocs having command line override settings in files. But that's not at all the bug of cdbs I'm talking about here. Yours Micha From uphhxfhu at superiorink.com Thu Jun 8 09:35:13 2006 From: uphhxfhu at superiorink.com (Benjamin Chandler) Date: Thu Jun 8 11:44:46 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Do You Trade Penny stocks? Message-ID: <002701c68adf$2d9027c6$5761cb56@grww.quaibq> WINNER**WINNER**WINNER**WINNER**WINNER To All Investors. Put HRRP on your Radar Screens immediately Now is the time to do your research. 5:1 Forward Split The forward stock split will be effective on or about June 15, 2006, at which time the additional shares in certificate form will be mailed directly to shareholders without action on their part. Date: Thursday, June 8, 2006 HE-5 Resources, Corp. Symbol: HRRP Price: $0.47 Position: Positive Buy Gold, Silver, Copper, Zinc and Platinum Breaking News was Released HE-5 Resources, Corp. Extends Record Date of Forward Split For pennies you can participate in a ST0CK that could yield results over and over again just based on the trading patterns if the company is able to effectuate it's business model. WATCH OUT!!! We could see a GREAT STORY IN THE MAKING. GOOD LUCK AND TRADE OUT AT THE TOP!!!! Sincerely, Jose Mckinley RVG Group From integridadpublica at integridadpublica.com Wed Jun 7 20:50:59 2006 From: integridadpublica at integridadpublica.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Integridad_P=FAblica?=) Date: Thu Jun 8 12:36:29 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] =?windows-1252?q?Integridad_P=FAblica=3A_?= =?windows-1252?q?Encuesta_sobre_los_candidatos_presidenciales=2E_S?= =?windows-1252?q?exto_Periodo?= Message-ID: <1afcae4d7c3ba0269459958100115823@integridadpublica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060607/21ccb7b9/attachment.htm From john_morre5 at virgilio.it Fri Jun 9 03:17:14 2006 From: john_morre5 at virgilio.it (JOHN MORRE) Date: Fri Jun 9 03:23:38 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] see Message-ID: <10bb6cb2651.john_morre5@virgilio.it> Attn: Sir/Madam, {HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL} (RE: TRANSFER OF (THIRTY SIX MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY NINE THOUSAND POUNDS STERLINGS) RE: TRANSFER OF 36,759,000.00 MILLION POUNDS TO YOUR ACCOUNT. My name is Dr.John Morre and I work in the International Operation Department in a Bank here in London.I feel quite safe dealing with you in this important business.Though, this medium (Internet) has been greatly abused, I choose to reach you through it because it still remains the fastest medium of communication. However, this correspondence is unofficial and private, and it should be treated as such. At first I will like to assure you that this transaction is 100% risk and trouble free to both parties. WE WANT TO TRANSFER OUT MONEY FROM OUR BANK HERE IN LONDON. THE FUND FOR TRANSFER IS OF CLEAN ORIGIN. THE OWNER OF THIS ACCOUNT IS A FOREIGNER, a program leader.Until his death,The Late Prime Minister, Mr. Rafik Hariri, has a huge investment here in the United Kingdom and all over the world, as a matter of fact he has the sum of (THIRTY SIX MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY NINE THOUSAND POUNDS STERLINGS) in his account here in London which he deposited as a family valuables.The family do not know about this deposit.I was on a routine inspection that I discovered a dormant domiciliary account with a BAL. Of (THIRTY SIX MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY NINE THOUSAND POUNDS STERLINGS) on further discreet investigation, I also discovered that the account holder has passed away (dead) leaving no beneficiary to the account. The bank will approve this money to any foreigner because the former operator of the a/c is a foreigner. I am certainly sure that nobody will come again for the claim of this money. A foreigner can only claim this money with legal claims to the account Holder, Therefore I need your cooperation in this transaction. I will provide all necessary information needed in order to claim this money.Hoping in God that you will never let me down now and in future.o.k! Rafik Bahaa Edine Hariri (November 1, 1944 - February 14, 2005), married to Nazek Audi Hariri, was a Lebanese self-made billionaire and business tycoon, and was five times Prime Minister of Lebanon (1992-1998 and 2000-2004) before his last resignation from office on October 20, 2004. The late Rafik Hariri died on February 14, 2005 when explosives equivalent to around 300 kg of C4 were detonated as his motorcade drove past the Saint George Hotel i n the Lebanese capital, for more information please log on to (http://www.hariri.info/) I WANT TO TRANSFER THIS MONEY INTO A SAFE FOREIGN ACCOUNT ABROAD BUT I DON'T KNOW ANY FOREIGNER WHOM I CAN TRUST, I KNOW THAT THIS MESSAGE WILL COME TO YOU AS A SURPRISE AS WE DON'T KNOW OURSELVES BEFORE, BUT BE SURE THAT IT IS REAL AND A GENUINE BUSINESS. I CONTACT YOU BELIEVING THAT YOU WILL NOT LET ME DOWN ONCE THE FUND GOES INTO YOUR ACCOUNT. Let me hear from you urgently by Email FYI: The status of the cdbs source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.4.39-0.1 Current version: 0.4.40 -- This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. From petere at debian.org Sat Jun 10 21:22:18 2006 From: petere at debian.org (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Sat Jun 10 21:54:23 2006 Subject: Bug#369268: [Build-common-hackers] debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <44875635.9010002@lenk.info> References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <200606080006.52683.petere@debian.org> <44875635.9010002@lenk.info> Message-ID: <200606102322.18669.petere@debian.org> Micha Lenk wrote: > The difference compared to dh_installdocs is, that I didn't configure > cdbs (on my own) to install any docs. Neither in config files like > the .docs files nor on command line (okay, pointless in > debian/rules). I just created the .docs files because I > trusted cdbs to make proper use of dh_installdocs. Thus I did expect > it to do the same like I did without cdbs calling dh_installdocs in > debian/rules on my own. I understand that this is a problem. Right now, I don't know how to attack this. But I'll leave this bug open until we find new inspiration. From owner at bugs.debian.org Sat Jun 10 21:48:21 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sat Jun 10 21:56:14 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: tagging 370774 In-Reply-To: <20060610212438.74D33F1784@colt.pezone.net> References: <20060610212438.74D33F1784@colt.pezone.net> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 370774 moreinfo Bug#370774: cdbs: please add hooks after dh_md5sums or move it to binary-predeb There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From peter_e at gmx.net Sat Jun 10 21:35:46 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Sat Jun 10 21:57:00 2006 Subject: Bug#202873: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#202873: cdbs: Please add support for dh-buildinfo In-Reply-To: <20060607194744.7671809a.dr@jones.dk> References: <20060606222955.21cee671.dr@jones.dk> <200606062310.37541.peter_e@gmx.net> <20060607194744.7671809a.dr@jones.dk> Message-ID: <200606102335.46610.peter_e@gmx.net> Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Probably I used a custom make target with a (later?) package-specific > rule depending on it, and then at some point moved to the current > setup but forgot to remove the now unnecessary cleanup. I'll check, > and simplify the snippet if that's the case. At this point, I suggest that if you get your makefile snippet in shape, let's put it in. From sam at robots.org.uk Sun Jun 11 00:55:32 2006 From: sam at robots.org.uk (Sam Morris) Date: Sun Jun 11 01:12:13 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#372682: cdbs: Hides errors when reversing patches fails Message-ID: <20060611005532.3247.2322.reportbug@xerces> Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.40 Severity: important For some reason patch is failing to reverse a patch when cleaning the source of a package I am working on: patches: debian/patches/100_use_lua50.patch debian/patches/150_autoreconf.patch debian/patches/200_log_to_home_dir.patch Trying reversed patch debian/patches/200_log_to_home_dir.patch at level 1...success. Trying reversed patch debian/patches/150_autoreconf.patch at level 1...0...2.../bin/sh: line 23: 2832 Done $cat $patch 2833 Aborted | patch -d . $reverse -E --dry-run -p$level >$logfile 2>&1 failure (ignored). Trying reversed patch debian/patches/100_use_lua50.patch at level 1...success. CDBS should not ignore this failure! It should have caused an error while cleaning the source. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (530, 'testing'), (520, 'unstable'), (510, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) cdbs depends on no packages. Versions of packages cdbs recommends: ii autotools-dev 20060223.1 Update infrastructure for config.{ ii debhelper 5.0.35 helper programs for debian/rules -- no debconf information From owner at bugs.debian.org Sun Jun 11 06:48:09 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sun Jun 11 06:53:01 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: severity of 372682 is normal In-Reply-To: <20060611060840.B6B31F13D1@colt.pezone.net> References: <20060611060840.B6B31F13D1@colt.pezone.net> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 372682 normal Bug#372682: cdbs: Hides errors when reversing patches fails Severity set to `normal' from `important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From petere at debian.org Tue Jun 13 06:32:56 2006 From: petere at debian.org (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Tue Jun 13 06:34:45 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Re: New python distutils class In-Reply-To: <87pshdn4sc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <87pshdn4sc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <200606130832.57699.petere@debian.org> Marc Dequ?nes wrote: > As you may have heard, Python packaging is moving fast these days. We > plan the move the current Python version to 2.4 and in the same time > are drafting a new policy and creating new tools to greatly improve > the current situation. All this leads to the need for a newer class, > which will at the end replace the current one completly. Thank you for working on this. I haven't tested this yet at all, but I have a couple of small concerns about your proposal: - Perhaps in keeping with the style of cdbs, it would be better to have two classes python-pycentral and python-pysupport (and some python-common or python-core) behind it? This would also avoid the tacky use of -ng in the class name. :-) - DEB_PYTHON_MODULE_PACKAGE should perhaps default to the package that matches python-* in addition to the other criteria? - The appearance of the DEB_PYTHON_PRIVATE_MODULES_DIRS variable seems to be unrelated to this change. I don't doubt it might be useful, but I just want to be sure where it's coming from. At the risk of reopening a flame war, what is the point of supporting two build systems? I can understand that when you write your rules file by hand, one system or the other may be more convenient in a particular situation. But when cdbs runs things, it seems to make no difference to the users, so why should they be burdened with this choice? Btw., before this can be uploaded, it would be good if some of these build dependencies existed first, so a test case can be written. From hertzog at debian.org Tue Jun 13 06:58:43 2006 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Tue Jun 13 07:01:51 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Re: New python distutils class In-Reply-To: <200606130832.57699.petere@debian.org> References: <87pshdn4sc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <200606130832.57699.petere@debian.org> Message-ID: <20060613065843.GE13506@ouaza.com> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > - The appearance of the DEB_PYTHON_PRIVATE_MODULES_DIRS variable seems > to be unrelated to this change. I don't doubt it might be useful, but > I just want to be sure where it's coming from. Well, it's kind of unrelated since the old dh_python can also benefit from it... but it's really needed now since packages with private modules will have to supply it from now on. > At the risk of reopening a flame war, what is the point of supporting > two build systems? I can understand that when you write your rules > file by hand, one system or the other may be more convenient in a > particular situation. But when cdbs runs things, it seems to make no > difference to the users, so why should they be burdened with this > choice? The CDBS users of this class are the python maintainers, and since there's no consensus yet on the right tool, we want to offer the choice... :-) > Btw., before this can be uploaded, it would be good if some of these > build dependencies existed first, so a test case can be written. They exist, they are in unstable as of today. And we have lots of python modules using CDBS to update, so it would be great if Marc can finish his class today and if you can upload a new version quickly afterwards. :-) Cheers, -- Rapha?l Hertzog Premier livre fran?ais sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ From blade at debian.org Tue Jun 13 08:35:15 2006 From: blade at debian.org (Eduard Bloch) Date: Tue Jun 13 09:12:12 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373164: cdbs: stop overriding DEB_DESTDIR Message-ID: <20060613083515.10899.16369.reportbug@zombie.inka.de> Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.40 Severity: important Please stop using abusing the DEB_DESTDIR variable which have been used by module-assistant includes for many years now. Please do better research when starting using variables, blindly overriding the existing ones. Please give the variables useful names. DEB_DESTDIR does not mean the destination directory for the deb file. It means something different any maybe should be renamed to CDBS_CONTENTS_DIR. Exactly like most of your other variables, why are you using DEB_ prefix? CDBS_ would be more appropriate, it would describe who set it and why. Eduard. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) cdbs depends on no packages. Versions of packages cdbs recommends: ii autotools-dev 20060223.1 Update infrastructure for config.{ ii debhelper 5.0.35 helper programs for debian/rules -- no debconf information From duck at duckcorp.org Tue Jun 13 09:31:51 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Tue Jun 13 09:41:52 2006 Subject: Bug#373164: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373164: cdbs: stop overriding DEB_DESTDIR In-Reply-To: <20060613083515.10899.16369.reportbug@zombie.inka.de> (Eduard Bloch's message of "Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:35:15 +0200") References: <20060613083515.10899.16369.reportbug@zombie.inka.de> Message-ID: <87bqsxmmew.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> tags 373164 + wontfix thanks Coin, Eduard Bloch writes: > Please stop using abusing the DEB_DESTDIR variable which have been used > by module-assistant includes for many years now. Please do better > research when starting using variables, blindly overriding the existing > ones. Please give the variables useful names. DEB_DESTDIR does not mean > the destination directory for the deb file. It means something different > any maybe should be renamed to CDBS_CONTENTS_DIR. Exactly like most of > your other variables, why are you using DEB_ prefix? CDBS_ would be > more appropriate, it would describe who set it and why. CDBS is using DEB_DESTDIR (and DEB_*) for years. I don't know which one used it first, but this is quite an ancient behavior ; i'm astonished you complained this late, as it is now *IMPOSSIBLE* to fix this problem, too many packages would FTBFS if we change such variables. I strongly agree CDBS_* would have been better, nevertheless, why should module-assistant have the priviledge of DEB_* variables usage ? If the closest relationship to debhelper wins, then CDBS wins. -- Marc Dequ?nes (Duck) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060613/919c4437/attachment.pgp From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jun 13 09:33:33 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue Jun 13 09:49:49 2006 Subject: Processed: Re: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373164: cdbs: stop overriding DEB_DESTDIR In-Reply-To: <87bqsxmmew.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <87bqsxmmew.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > tags 373164 + wontfix Bug#373164: cdbs: stop overriding DEB_DESTDIR There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From edi at gmx.de Tue Jun 13 09:44:04 2006 From: edi at gmx.de (Eduard Bloch) Date: Tue Jun 13 09:50:58 2006 Subject: Bug#373164: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373164: cdbs: stop overriding DEB_DESTDIR In-Reply-To: <87bqsxmmew.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <20060613083515.10899.16369.reportbug@zombie.inka.de> <87bqsxmmew.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <20060613094404.GA15935@rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de> #include * Marc Dequ?nes [Tue, Jun 13 2006, 11:31:51AM]: > > tags 373164 + wontfix > thanks Then document it properly. What I expect as user is a good readable overview of how CDBS poisons the environment: ie. a complete list of variables set and overriden by it with links to the conflicting packages. Currently, your manual is unreadable because all the var names are spread over different paragraphs, I would like to see a summary, a table with names, short descriptions and links. > Eduard Bloch writes: > > > Please stop using abusing the DEB_DESTDIR variable which have been used > > by module-assistant includes for many years now. Please do better > > research when starting using variables, blindly overriding the existing > > ones. Please give the variables useful names. DEB_DESTDIR does not mean > > the destination directory for the deb file. It means something different > > any maybe should be renamed to CDBS_CONTENTS_DIR. Exactly like most of > > your other variables, why are you using DEB_ prefix? CDBS_ would be > > more appropriate, it would describe who set it and why. > > CDBS is using DEB_DESTDIR (and DEB_*) for years. I don't know which one > used it first, but this is quite an ancient behavior ; i'm astonished > you complained this late, as it is now *IMPOSSIBLE* to fix this problem, > too many packages would FTBFS if we change such variables. I sent a complaint to your mailing list before. Apparently it has been ignored. > I strongly agree CDBS_* would have been better, nevertheless, why should > module-assistant have the priviledge of DEB_* variables usage ? If the > closest relationship to debhelper wins, then CDBS wins. And if the closest relationship of the var name and var meaning counts, then module-assistant wins. Eduard. From dr at jones.dk Tue Jun 13 10:26:06 2006 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Tue Jun 13 10:40:59 2006 Subject: Bug#202873: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#202873: cdbs: Please add support for dh-buildinfo In-Reply-To: <200606102335.46610.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <20060606222955.21cee671.dr@jones.dk> <200606062310.37541.peter_e@gmx.net> <20060607194744.7671809a.dr@jones.dk> <200606102335.46610.peter_e@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20060613122606.178c9095.dr@jones.dk> On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:35:46 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Probably I used a custom make target with a (later?) > > package-specific rule depending on it, and then at some point moved > > to the current setup but forgot to remove the now unnecessary > > cleanup. I'll check, and simplify the snippet if that's the case. > > At this point, I suggest that if you get your makefile snippet in > shape, let's put it in. Ok. Easiest way would be if I had write access to SVN. Could you please (ass current member of the team) get in touch with the Alioth admins to figure out what's wrong? Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er n?r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060613/45ae4ea5/attachment-0001.pgp From peter_e at gmx.net Tue Jun 13 10:10:26 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Tue Jun 13 10:43:17 2006 Subject: Bug#373164: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373164: cdbs: stop overriding DEB_DESTDIR In-Reply-To: <20060613083515.10899.16369.reportbug@zombie.inka.de> References: <20060613083515.10899.16369.reportbug@zombie.inka.de> Message-ID: <200606131210.27333.peter_e@gmx.net> Eduard Bloch wrote: > Please stop using abusing the DEB_DESTDIR variable which have been > used by module-assistant includes for many years now. We're not going to rename variables just because you say so. Please provide an example of why this is a problem so we can come to a workable solution. > Please do better research when starting using variables, I don't know the history of this, but this is kind of interesting: module-assistant (0.1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial Release, closes: #207709 -- Eduard Bloch Fri, 05 Sep 2003 23:47:01 +0200 cdbs (0.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial version (Closes: #188049). -- Colin Walters Mon, 12 May 2003 17:23:20 -0400 From duck at duckcorp.org Tue Jun 13 13:33:36 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Tue Jun 13 15:04:21 2006 Subject: Bug#373164: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373164: cdbs: stop overriding DEB_DESTDIR In-Reply-To: <20060613094404.GA15935@rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de> (Eduard Bloch's message of "Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:44:04 +0200") References: <20060613083515.10899.16369.reportbug@zombie.inka.de> <87bqsxmmew.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <20060613094404.GA15935@rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: <87slm9kwnj.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Eduard Bloch writes: > Then document it properly. What I expect as user is a good readable > overview of how CDBS poisons the environment: ie. a complete list of > variables set and overriden by it with links to the conflicting > packages. Currently, your manual is unreadable because all the var names > are spread over different paragraphs, I would like to see a summary, a > table with names, short descriptions and links. The current documentation is more a tutorial than a reference. It is being improved regulary and if you followed the thread on d-devel you would have read we plan to reorganise it and improve it. It is unfortunately poisoned by a conflict between Peter and me. But notice among all the CDBS users, which are now many, none proposed to help us do any improvement in the documentation. > I sent a complaint to your mailing list before. Apparently it has been > ignored. I was probably not on the list yet. I do understand your complaint, but understand CDBS would not change currently used variables (even if we can start using a new namespace from now). If you can agree with the release team to NMU all the so many packages that would be broken by such important changes in a short enough timeframe, then *perhaps* Peter would allow this, but we are not going to do it ourselves. > And if the closest relationship of the var name and var meaning counts, > then module-assistant wins. Are you here for flamewars or to find solutions ? Waiting for Peter about the namespace proposal. I may start using it for the new variables introduced in the new python class, but this decision must be taken quickly. -- Marc Dequ?nes (Duck) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060613/b08eccaf/attachment.pgp From peter_e at gmx.net Tue Jun 13 16:54:51 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Tue Jun 13 17:13:00 2006 Subject: Bug#373164: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373164: cdbs: stop overriding DEB_DESTDIR In-Reply-To: <87slm9kwnj.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <20060613083515.10899.16369.reportbug@zombie.inka.de> <20060613094404.GA15935@rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de> <87slm9kwnj.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <200606131854.52586.peter_e@gmx.net> Marc Dequ?nes wrote: > Waiting for Peter about the namespace proposal. I may start using it > for the new variables introduced in the new python class, but this > decision must be taken quickly. If there is ever going to be something like a CDBS 2 rewrite, then the makefile variable namespaces can be considered. But I think starting a new naming scheme right now in the midst of some other transition, which will be tricky enough, would just be messy. And it won't actually solve the problem at hand. I'm still not seeing the actual bug here. There could be any number of makefile helpers available for Debian. That doesn't mean that they all have to work together. Certainly the fact that cdbs and module-assistant cannot work together does not have a "major effect on the usability" of the cdbs package, or of the module-assistant package for that matter. From duck at duckcorp.org Tue Jun 13 23:00:27 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?utf-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Tue Jun 13 23:01:08 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Re: New python distutils class In-Reply-To: <200606130832.57699.petere@debian.org> (Peter Eisentraut's message of "Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:32:56 +0200") References: <87pshdn4sc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <200606130832.57699.petere@debian.org> Message-ID: <87fyi8lkz8.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Coin, Peter Eisentraut writes: > - Perhaps in keeping with the style of cdbs, it would be better to have > two classes python-pycentral and python-pysupport (and some > python-common or python-core) behind it? This would also avoid the > tacky use of -ng in the class name. :-) buxy replied to this. I would add by having a method selector we can in the end remove the obsoleted method when this comes, as nothing else (from a user point of view) is method-specific. > - DEB_PYTHON_MODULE_PACKAGE should perhaps default to the package that > matches python-* in addition to the other criteria? As python package don't have to match python-* in all cases (apps don't), i conclude this is wrong in such cases, and superflous in other ones. With no comment from people on IRC when i asked, i decided to leave this untouched. > Btw., before this can be uploaded, it would be good if some of these > build dependencies existed first, so a test case can be written. They all are available in unstable now. You can find in my web directory 2 examples (soya and editobj), where, besides bugs in pysupport or pycentral, are well built using an updated version of the class : http://perso.duckcorp.org/duck/python-new-policy/ buxy also tested 3 packages : http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/python/examples/ In needed_tools/ you'll find the corresponding cdbs package i intend to upload if you have no objection (or you may upload it yourself if you prefer). But please be quick, we are close to the release team deadline. -- Marc Dequ?nes (Duck) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060614/e9f149be/attachment.pgp From hertzog at debian.org Wed Jun 14 06:25:35 2006 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Wed Jun 14 06:29:05 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Re: New python distutils class In-Reply-To: <87fyi8lkz8.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <87pshdn4sc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <200606130832.57699.petere@debian.org> <87fyi8lkz8.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <20060614062535.GB13581@ouaza.com> On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Marc Dequ?nes wrote: > > - Perhaps in keeping with the style of cdbs, it would be better to have > > two classes python-pycentral and python-pysupport (and some > > python-common or python-core) behind it? This would also avoid the > > tacky use of -ng in the class name. :-) > > buxy replied to this. I would add by having a method selector we can in > the end remove the obsoleted method when this comes, as nothing else > (from a user point of view) is method-specific. Agreed. > > - DEB_PYTHON_MODULE_PACKAGE should perhaps default to the package that > > matches python-* in addition to the other criteria? > > As python package don't have to match python-* in all cases (apps > don't), i conclude this is wrong in such cases, and superflous in other > ones. With no comment from people on IRC when i asked, i decided to > leave this untouched. Can most python applications be installed with distutils? (i.e. I'm not sure that the class is going to be really used for python applications) > In needed_tools/ you'll find the corresponding cdbs package i intend to > upload if you have no objection (or you may upload it yourself if you > prefer). You have right problems on the source package (403 forbidden). I would love to have this upload to happen today before dinstall (19:00 UTC) as we have many python packages relying on CDBS in the team. Cheers, -- Rapha?l Hertzog Premier livre fran?ais sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ From hertzog at debian.org Wed Jun 14 12:19:15 2006 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Wed Jun 14 12:22:32 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Re: New python distutils class In-Reply-To: <87fyi8lkz8.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <87pshdn4sc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <200606130832.57699.petere@debian.org> <87fyi8lkz8.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <20060614121915.GB14837@ouaza.com> On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Marc Dequ?nes wrote: > They all are available in unstable now. You can find in my web directory > 2 examples (soya and editobj), where, besides bugs in pysupport or > pycentral, are well built using an updated version of the class : > http://perso.duckcorp.org/duck/python-new-policy/ Here's a patch for the class, it used "python2.3" instead of "python" for arch: all packages with pycentral. Cheers, -- Rapha?l Hertzog Premier livre fran?ais sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -------------- next part -------------- --- python-distutils-ng.mk.orig 2006-06-14 13:41:18.000000000 +0200 +++ python-distutils-ng.mk 2006-06-14 13:45:57.000000000 +0200 @@ -115,9 +115,15 @@ find $(DEB_DESTDIR)/$(cdbs_python_support_path) -type f -a -name "*.so" -exec rm {} \; find $(DEB_DESTDIR)/$(cdbs_python_support_path) -depth -type d -a -empty -exec rmdir {} \; else +ifeq (all, $(cdbs_python_module_arch)) +common-install-arch common-install-indep:: python-install-py +else common-install-arch common-install-indep:: $(addprefix python-install-, $(cdbs_python_build_versions)) python-install-%: cd $(DEB_SRCDIR) && python$* $(DEB_PYTHON_SETUP_CMD) install --root=$(DEB_DESTDIR) $(DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS) +endif # archall detection +python-install-py: + cd $(DEB_SRCDIR) && python $(DEB_PYTHON_SETUP_CMD) install --root=$(DEB_DESTDIR) $(DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS) endif # install selection From editora at editoradiretiva.com.br Wed Jun 14 14:54:27 2006 From: editora at editoradiretiva.com.br (Diretiva) Date: Wed Jun 14 14:54:54 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] =?iso-8859-1?q?Monografia_-_Gabarito_Elet?= =?iso-8859-1?q?r=F4nico_=5BNS=5D?= Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060614/53f9f760/attachment.html From madcoder at debian.org Wed Jun 14 16:45:54 2006 From: madcoder at debian.org (Pierre Habouzit) Date: Wed Jun 14 17:22:29 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373628: cdbs: please support dh_pythonsupport and/or dh_pythoncentral Message-ID: <20060614164554.13532.13897.reportbug@mad.intersec.eu> Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.40 Severity: normal all is in the title. I know cdbs guys are already aware of that, but I need a bug # to block python transition bugs by it ;) TIA -- ?O? Pierre Habouzit ??O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org From dak at ftp-master.debian.org Wed Jun 14 18:00:17 2006 From: dak at ftp-master.debian.org (Archive Administrator) Date: Wed Jun 14 18:00:31 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processing of cdbs_0.4.41_i386.changes Message-ID: cdbs_0.4.41_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdbs_0.4.41.dsc cdbs_0.4.41.tar.gz cdbs_0.4.41_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon From installer at ftp-master.debian.org Wed Jun 14 18:02:09 2006 From: installer at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Wed Jun 14 18:11:46 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] cdbs_0.4.41_i386.changes ACCEPTED Message-ID: Accepted: cdbs_0.4.41.dsc to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.41.dsc cdbs_0.4.41.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.41.tar.gz cdbs_0.4.41_all.deb to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.41_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 360589 369335 373628 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From owner at bugs.debian.org Wed Jun 14 18:18:20 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Wed Jun 14 18:21:59 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#360589: marked as done (please add support for qmake) References: <20060403135611.12216.52417.reportbug@katha> Message-ID: Your message dated Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:02:09 -0700 with message-id and subject line Bug#360589: fixed in cdbs 0.4.41 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Steffen Joeris Subject: please add support for qmake Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 15:56:11 +0200 Size: 2223 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060614/990b3f28/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Bug#360589: fixed in cdbs 0.4.41 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:02:09 -0700 Size: 3235 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060614/990b3f28/attachment-0001.mht From owner at bugs.debian.org Wed Jun 14 18:18:22 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Wed Jun 14 18:23:02 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#369335: marked as done (python-distutils.mk: does not honour DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION when calling dh_python) References: <20060529074944.1839.37173.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Your message dated Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:02:09 -0700 with message-id and subject line Bug#369335: fixed in cdbs 0.4.41 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Vincent Danjean Subject: python-distutils.mk: does not honour DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION when calling dh_python Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 09:49:44 +0200 Size: 2932 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060614/9b1bfee0/attachment-0002.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Bug#369335: fixed in cdbs 0.4.41 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:02:09 -0700 Size: 3210 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060614/9b1bfee0/attachment-0003.mht From owner at bugs.debian.org Wed Jun 14 18:18:28 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Wed Jun 14 18:24:39 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373628: marked as done (cdbs: please support dh_pythonsupport and/or dh_pythoncentral) References: <20060614164554.13532.13897.reportbug@mad.intersec.eu> Message-ID: Your message dated Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:02:09 -0700 with message-id and subject line Bug#373628: fixed in cdbs 0.4.41 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Pierre Habouzit Subject: cdbs: please support dh_pythonsupport and/or dh_pythoncentral Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:45:54 +0200 Size: 1868 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060614/682105ce/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Bug#373628: fixed in cdbs 0.4.41 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:02:09 -0700 Size: 3235 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060614/682105ce/attachment-0001.mht From hertzog at debian.org Wed Jun 14 20:06:16 2006 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Wed Jun 14 21:09:57 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373653: cdbs: Some details to fix in the new python-distutils.mk Message-ID: <20060614200616.29296.70350.reportbug@localhost> Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.41 Severity: normal I've seen two little problems with the updated python class: 1/ Using DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL=1 debian/rules clean generate a build-depends on: cdbs (>= 0.4.43) The version should be 0.4.41 ... also you will have double Build-Depends on debhelper/cdbs, I don't know if you can merge that nicely one day. 2/ The error message if you don't have DEB_PYTHON_SYSTEM says to define DEB_PYTHON_SUPPORT (instead of SYSTEM) ... (my fault ;-)) Cheers, -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) cdbs depends on no packages. Versions of packages cdbs recommends: ii autotools-dev 20060223.1 Update infrastructure for config.{ ii debhelper 5.0.37.1 helper programs for debian/rules -- no debconf information From sto at debian.org Thu Jun 15 00:16:01 2006 From: sto at debian.org (Sergio Talens-Oliag) Date: Thu Jun 15 00:43:32 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373678: python-distutils.mk DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS variable should be DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS_ALL Message-ID: <20060615001600.GA24248@uv.es> Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060615/36a75458/attachment.pgp From jirspring at pop.co.th Wed Jun 14 11:51:49 2006 From: jirspring at pop.co.th (Uk National Lottery) Date: Thu Jun 15 06:46:27 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Congratulations from the Uk Online Lottery Commission!!! Message-ID: <49448.213.185.118.200.1150285909.overlook@mail.pop.co.th> The National Lottery P.O.Box 17, Kempsford GL7 4WZ London. UNITED KINGDOM (Customer Services) Date:14th of June 2006. FROM:UK NATIONAL LOTTERY TICKET NUMBER: 74454774 SERIAL NUMBER: 144-66584 BATCH NUMBER : BT-4478474121P AWARD FINAL NOTIFICATION: We happily announce to you the draw (#999) of the UK NATIONAL LOTTERY,online Sweepstakes International program held on the 12th of June 2006. You were entered as dependent clients with: Reference SERIAL NUMBER: 144-66584 and Batch number BT-4478474121P. Your email address attached to the ticket number: 74454774 that drew the lucky winning numbers:02 03 04 05 24 (02) Bonus Ball [38] which subsequently won you the lottery in the 2nd category i.e match 5 plus bonus. You have been approved for a payment of 500,000.00 POUNDS (FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND Pounds Sterling.) in cash credited to file reference number:UKL/K5598/U4.This is from a total cash prize of five million pounds shared among the ten international winners in first categories. All participants were selected through a computer ballot system drawn from 50,000 (Fifty thousand) names of email users around the world, as part of our international promotion program. Due to mixed up of some names and addresses,we ask that you keep this award personal, till your claims has been processed and your funds remitted to you.This is part of our security measures to avoid double claiming or unwarranted taking advantage of the situation by other participants or impersonators,You are to contact our accredited agent for your winnings. Mr.ALAN PARISH. UNITED KINGDOM LOTTERY CLAIMS AGENT. UK NATIONAL LOTTERY SECURITY AGENCY. E-mail:alanparish_claims02@yahoo.co.uk Tel:+447031820222 He is your agent, and responsible for the processing and transfer of your winnings to you. YOUR SECURITY FILE NUMBER IS Z-90237-Y=B067/U4 (keep personal) Remember, your winnings must be claimed not later than (28th of June 2006). Our Lottery agent will immediately commence the process to facilitate the release of your funds as soon as you contact him. You may wish to establish contact via e-mail with the particulars presented above citing the batch and reference numbers to this letter. Our winners are assured of the utmost standards of confidentiality, and press anonymity until the end of proceedings, and beyond where they so desire. Be further advised to maintain the strictest level of confidentiality until the end of proceedings to circumvent problems associated with fraudulent claims. This is part of our precautionary measure to avoid double claiming and unwarranted abuse of this program. Goodluck from me and members of staff of the UK NATIONAL LOTTERY. Yours faithfully, Jir Spring Online coordinator for UK NATIONAL LOTTERY Sweepstakes International Program. Copyright =A9 1994-2006 The UK National Lottery Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Service - Guidelines From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jun 15 09:03:42 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu Jun 15 09:14:19 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: severity of 373678 is important In-Reply-To: <20060615083647.C9CC3500093@mx.duckcorp.org> References: <20060615083647.C9CC3500093@mx.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 373678 important Bug#373678: python-distutils.mk DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS variable should be DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS_ALL Severity set to `important' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From duck at duckcorp.org Thu Jun 15 08:43:11 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Thu Jun 15 09:21:28 2006 Subject: Bug#202873: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#202873: cdbs: Please add support for dh-buildinfo In-Reply-To: <20060613122606.178c9095.dr@jones.dk> (Jonas Smedegaard's message of "Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:26:06 +0200") References: <20060606222955.21cee671.dr@jones.dk> <200606062310.37541.peter_e@gmx.net> <20060607194744.7671809a.dr@jones.dk> <200606102335.46610.peter_e@gmx.net> <20060613122606.178c9095.dr@jones.dk> Message-ID: <87fyi6kdwg.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Coin, Jonas Smedegaard writes: > Ok. Easiest way would be if I had write access to SVN. Could you please > (ass current member of the team) get in touch with the Alioth admins to > figure out what's wrong? BTW, i do request the same access as i'm in the Team too, and as cooperation is now possible. I'd then be able to fix the Python class quickly for example. I do not plan on doing unreviewed uploads for important changes, don't worry. -- Marc Dequ?nes (Duck) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060615/306530fd/attachment-0001.pgp From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jun 15 09:03:46 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu Jun 15 09:26:33 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: severity of 373653 is important In-Reply-To: <20060615083719.8A6F6500093@mx.duckcorp.org> References: <20060615083719.8A6F6500093@mx.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 373653 important Bug#373653: cdbs: Some details to fix in the new python-distutils.mk Severity set to `important' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From doko at cs.tu-berlin.de Fri Jun 16 02:11:39 2006 From: doko at cs.tu-berlin.de (Matthias Klose) Date: Fri Jun 16 02:46:14 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373873: misleading python-distutils.mk error message Message-ID: <17554.4955.789419.869523@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.41 /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/python-distutils.mk:58: *** Your package uses the new Python policy; you must set DEB_PYTHON_SUPPORT to "pycentral" or "pysupport".. Stop. please s/DEB_PYTHON_SUPPORT/DEB_PYTHON_SYSTEM/ From postmaster at aph.gov.au Fri Jun 16 12:22:38 2006 From: postmaster at aph.gov.au (postmaster@aph.gov.au) Date: Fri Jun 16 12:23:29 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. adam.cunningham.reps@aph.gov.au -------------- next part -------------- Skipped content of type message/delivery-status-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Subject: ????????? ???????? ? ????????? ???. (495) 507 07 23 ICQ: 245-664-146 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:23:18 +0300 Size: 8335 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/8c35b533/attachment.mht From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Jun 16 17:18:32 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri Jun 16 17:26:48 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: tagging 373164, tagging 373164 In-Reply-To: <20060616165151.C6863F1777@colt.pezone.net> References: <20060616165151.C6863F1777@colt.pezone.net> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 373164 - wontfix Bug#373164: cdbs: stop overriding DEB_DESTDIR Tags were: wontfix Tags removed: wontfix > tags 373164 + moreinfo Bug#373164: cdbs: stop overriding DEB_DESTDIR There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From kov at debian.org Fri Jun 16 17:38:15 2006 From: kov at debian.org (Gustavo Noronha Silva) Date: Fri Jun 16 17:58:29 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373997: python-distutils.mk: ignores information about minor supported python version Message-ID: <20060616173815.6255.4934.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.41 Severity: important Hello, The current python-distutils.mk does this: # Calculate cdbs_python_build_versions cdbs_python_module_arch = $(strip $(shell perl -e '$$/=""; $$_=(grep {/^Package: $(DEB_PYTHON_MODULE_PACKAGE)$$/m;} (<>))[0]; /^Architecture: (.*)$$/m && print $$1' debian/control)) ifeq (all, $(cdbs_python_module_arch)) cdbs_python_current_version := $(strip $(patsubst python%, %, $(shell pyversions -d))) cdbs_python_build_versions := $(cdbs_python_current_version) else cdbs_python_build_versions := $(strip $(patsubst python%, %, $(shell pyversions -r debian/control | grep -E "^python[0-9.]+( python[0-9.]+)*$$"))) endif This means the information filled in the XS-Python-Version field is only being used when the package is not Arch: all. This is wrong, for there are python-only modules which will only work on Python 2.4 and above, for example. Maybe using the first version returned by pyversions -r debian/control for the first case will do it. Thanks, -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) cdbs depends on no packages. Versions of packages cdbs recommends: ii autotools-dev 20060223.1 Update infrastructure for config.{ ii debhelper 5.0.37.1 helper programs for debian/rules -- no debconf information From dak at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Jun 16 18:09:48 2006 From: dak at ftp-master.debian.org (Archive Administrator) Date: Fri Jun 16 18:28:42 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processing of cdbs_0.4.42_i386.changes Message-ID: cdbs_0.4.42_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdbs_0.4.42.dsc cdbs_0.4.42.tar.gz cdbs_0.4.42_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Jun 16 18:35:28 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri Jun 16 18:43:03 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373653: marked as done (cdbs: Some details to fix in the new python-distutils.mk) References: <20060614200616.29296.70350.reportbug@localhost> Message-ID: Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:17:03 -0700 with message-id and subject line Bug#373653: fixed in cdbs 0.4.42 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Raphael Hertzog Subject: cdbs: Some details to fix in the new python-distutils.mk Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:06:16 +0200 Size: 2738 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/17f0c188/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Bug#373653: fixed in cdbs 0.4.42 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:17:03 -0700 Size: 2965 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/17f0c188/attachment-0001.mht From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Jun 16 18:35:39 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri Jun 16 18:44:09 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373997: marked as done (python-distutils.mk: ignores information about minor supported python version) References: <20060616173815.6255.4934.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:17:03 -0700 with message-id and subject line Bug#373997: fixed in cdbs 0.4.42 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Gustavo Noronha Silva Subject: python-distutils.mk: ignores information about minor supported python version Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:38:15 -0300 Size: 3533 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/80abbb45/attachment-0002.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Bug#373997: fixed in cdbs 0.4.42 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:17:03 -0700 Size: 2990 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/80abbb45/attachment-0003.mht From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Jun 16 18:35:36 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri Jun 16 18:44:58 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373873: marked as done (misleading python-distutils.mk error message) References: <17554.4955.789419.869523@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Message-ID: Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:17:03 -0700 with message-id and subject line Bug#373873: fixed in cdbs 0.4.42 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Matthias Klose Subject: misleading python-distutils.mk error message Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 04:11:39 +0200 Size: 2277 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/d34c5f55/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Bug#373873: fixed in cdbs 0.4.42 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:17:03 -0700 Size: 2990 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/d34c5f55/attachment-0001.mht From installer at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Jun 16 18:17:03 2006 From: installer at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Fri Jun 16 18:51:12 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] cdbs_0.4.42_i386.changes ACCEPTED Message-ID: Accepted: cdbs_0.4.42.dsc to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.42.dsc cdbs_0.4.42.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.42.tar.gz cdbs_0.4.42_all.deb to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.42_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 373653 373678 373873 373997 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Jun 16 18:35:32 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri Jun 16 19:15:21 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373678: marked as done (python-distutils.mk DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS variable should be DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS_ALL) References: <20060615001600.GA24248@uv.es> Message-ID: Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:17:03 -0700 with message-id and subject line Bug#373678: fixed in cdbs 0.4.42 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Sergio Talens-Oliag Subject: python-distutils.mk DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS variable should be DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS_ALL Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:16:01 +0200 Size: 5223 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/679d98f2/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Bug#373678: fixed in cdbs 0.4.42 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:17:03 -0700 Size: 2990 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/679d98f2/attachment-0001.mht From duck at duckcorp.org Fri Jun 16 19:45:31 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Fri Jun 16 20:53:57 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374012: cdbs: $(cdbs_python_current_version) should always be set Message-ID: <87d5d8hokk.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.41 Severity: important Coin, The class is using this variable to fill the cdbs_python_build_versions variable for modules (archall packages). I thought it would naver be used in extensions, but doko made me discover i was wrong. In python-crypto, he needs this variable to build the documentation. Here is an example of a rule which should work: MKHOWTO = /usr/lib/python$(cdbs_python_current_version)/doc/tools/mkhowto common-build-arch:: cd Doc && $(MKHOWTO) --ps -- Marc Dequ?nes (Duck) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/16a77e03/attachment-0001.pgp From duck at duckcorp.org Fri Jun 16 19:45:44 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Fri Jun 16 20:54:02 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374013: cdbs: $(cdbs_python_current_version) should always be set Message-ID: <87bqsshok7.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.41 Severity: important Coin, The class is using this variable to fill the cdbs_python_build_versions variable for modules (archall packages). I thought it would naver be used in extensions, but doko made me discover i was wrong. In python-crypto, he needs this variable to build the documentation. Here is an example of a rule which should work: MKHOWTO = /usr/lib/python$(cdbs_python_current_version)/doc/tools/mkhowto common-build-arch:: cd Doc && $(MKHOWTO) --ps -- Marc Dequ?nes (Duck) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/699829a6/attachment-0001.pgp From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Jun 16 21:03:32 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri Jun 16 21:12:43 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374013: marked as done (cdbs: $(cdbs_python_current_version) should always be set) References: <200606162301.27984.petere@debian.org> <87bqsshok7.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 23:01:27 +0200 with message-id <200606162301.27984.petere@debian.org> and subject line Bug#374013: cdbs: $(cdbs_python_current_version) should always be set has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Marc =?utf-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck) Subject: cdbs: $(cdbs_python_current_version) should always be set Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:45:44 +0200 Size: 2703 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/10231532/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: Bug#374013: cdbs: $(cdbs_python_current_version) should always be set Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 23:01:27 +0200 Size: 1487 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060616/10231532/attachment-0001.mht From petere at debian.org Fri Jun 16 21:11:29 2006 From: petere at debian.org (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Fri Jun 16 22:04:28 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374012: cdbs: $(cdbs_python_current_version) should always be set In-Reply-To: <87d5d8hokk.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <87d5d8hokk.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <200606162311.29610.petere@debian.org> Marc Dequ?nes wrote: > Package: cdbs > Version: 0.4.41 > Severity: important Certainly, this doesn't have a "major impact on the usability" of this package? > The class is using this variable to fill the > cdbs_python_build_versions variable for modules (archall packages). I > thought it would naver be used in extensions, but doko made me > discover i was wrong. In python-crypto, he needs this variable to > build the documentation. > > Here is an example of a rule which should work: > > MKHOWTO = > /usr/lib/python$(cdbs_python_current_version)/doc/tools/mkhowto > > common-build-arch:: > cd Doc && $(MKHOWTO) --ps Offhand, it seems kind of silly that a Python package needs to ask cdbs for the current Python version. Perhaps it would make more sense if the unversioned "python" package provides a link to the current version? Something like /usr/lib/python/doc/tools/ -> /usr/lib/python2.4/doc/tools/ or even /usr/lib/python/ -> /usr/lib/python2.4/ I'm not against this change, but it seems to attack the problem from the wrong end. From integridadpublica at integridadpublica.com Sat Jun 17 07:17:13 2006 From: integridadpublica at integridadpublica.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Integridad_P=FAblica?=) Date: Sat Jun 17 07:45:39 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] =?windows-1252?q?Comentarios_y_resultados?= =?windows-1252?q?_de_la_6ta=2E_encuesta-panel=2E_Integridad_P=FAbl?= =?windows-1252?q?ica?= Message-ID: <00c752aa8e241617947e785f001de054@integridadpublica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060617/706f079d/attachment.htm From dr at jones.dk Sat Jun 17 21:27:59 2006 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Sat Jun 17 22:13:22 2006 Subject: Bug#202873: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#202873: cdbs: Please add support for dh-buildinfo In-Reply-To: <200606131247.22632.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <20060606222955.21cee671.dr@jones.dk> <200606102335.46610.peter_e@gmx.net> <20060613122606.178c9095.dr@jones.dk> <200606131247.22632.peter_e@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20060617232759.42fe1e94.dr@jones.dk> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:47:22 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > You wrote: > > Ok. Easiest way would be if I had write access to SVN. Could you > > please (ass current member of the team) get in touch with the Alioth > > admins to figure out what's wrong? > > I've fixed the permissions. Try again please. Yes, it works now. Thanks! I'll sync with my various local cdbs tweaks (after double-checking their sanity, of course), including the buildinfo snippet. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er n?r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060617/c53c126f/attachment.pgp From mfujise at itic.co.jp Mon Jun 19 06:51:34 2006 From: mfujise at itic.co.jp (International Technical Information Center) Date: Mon Jun 19 06:54:28 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCTCQ+NUJ6OS05cCIoGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCISE1Oz1RS11MdRsoQihUZWNobmljYWwgVHJhbnNsYXRpb24p?= Message-ID: <20060619.0651340015@mfujise-itic.co.jp> English texts follow Japanese. ?????????????? ????? ???? TEL: 03-5914-1360 FAX: 03-5914-1361 E-mail: mfujise@itic.co.jp URL: http://www.itic.co.jp/ ????????????????????????mfujise@itic.co.jp ?????????? build-common-hackers@lists.alioth.debian.org ? ?? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????URL: http://www.itic.co.jp/ ??????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????? ?? Dear Sir We are highly skilled in technical translation. Whenever your circumstances require translating, please visit our Internet website, http://www.itic.co.jp/index_English.htm, and contact us. Thank you for taking the time to read this message. Best regards, Mikio Fujise, President International Technical Information Center Co., Ltd. #312, 2-6-11, Sakashita Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan 174-0043 TEL: 03-5914-1360 FAX: 03-5914-1361 E-mail: mfujise@itic.co.jp URL: http://www.itic.co.jp/ From owner at bugs.debian.org Mon Jun 19 12:03:35 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon Jun 19 12:13:59 2006 Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#369268: [Build-common-hackers] debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <44968FF7.7050703@lenk.info> References: <44968FF7.7050703@lenk.info> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > tag 369268 +patch Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks. Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From micha at lenk.info Mon Jun 19 11:52:23 2006 From: micha at lenk.info (Micha Lenk) Date: Mon Jun 19 12:22:19 2006 Subject: Bug#369268: [Build-common-hackers] debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs In-Reply-To: <200606102322.18669.petere@debian.org> References: <200606061825.00537.petere@debian.org> <200606080006.52683.petere@debian.org> <44875635.9010002@lenk.info> <200606102322.18669.petere@debian.org> Message-ID: <44968FF7.7050703@lenk.info> tag 369268 +patch thanks. Peter Eisentraut schrieb: > Micha Lenk wrote: >> The difference compared to dh_installdocs is, that I didn't configure >> cdbs (on my own) to install any docs. Neither in config files like >> the .docs files nor on command line (okay, pointless in >> debian/rules). I just created the .docs files because I >> trusted cdbs to make proper use of dh_installdocs. Thus I did expect >> it to do the same like I did without cdbs calling dh_installdocs in >> debian/rules on my own. > > I understand that this is a problem. Right now, I don't know how to > attack this. But I'll leave this bug open until we find new > inspiration. I just reported #374426, a wishlist bug against debhelper asking for a new option --prefer-from-docs-files which changes dh_installdocs's behaviour that it now installs the files specified in a package.docs file in preference over the ones specified on command line. If this new option were implemented in dh_installdocs fixing this bug (#369268) would be fairly easy: Just call dh_installdocs with this new option. I attached a patch for debhelper.mk doing this. Note: This patch is only usable if the patch from #374426 has been applied to debhelper previously. I wrote in #374426 initial bug report: > I tried to implement this option but I don't know whether the approach > to solve #369268 is okay. So I would like at least a comment from a > cdbs maintainer whether he supports this wishlist bug and will make > use of the new option. So, it would be nice if you would comment on this new bug report. Yours Micha -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cdbs-prefer-from-docs-files.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 0 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060619/79b982fd/cdbs-prefer-from-docs-files.bin From owner at bugs.debian.org Mon Jun 19 20:18:38 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon Jun 19 20:27:53 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: severity of 374012 is wishlist In-Reply-To: <20060619200623.11726F1778@colt.pezone.net> References: <20060619200623.11726F1778@colt.pezone.net> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 374012 wishlist Bug#374012: cdbs: $(cdbs_python_current_version) should always be set Severity set to `wishlist' from `important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From duck at duckcorp.org Wed Jun 21 12:07:11 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Wed Jun 21 12:28:33 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374809: cdbs: updated python class needed to achieve the transition Message-ID: <87sllyd85s.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.42 Severity: Important Coin, Please update the class as soon as possible, this is needed to make use of the latest pysupport improvements. You will see some simplifications in the install process, a new check for 'debian/pycompat' required by the latest changes in the policy, better build-depends tightening (cdbs should ask for the version you will upload, so i requiered 0.4.43 by purpose), and some minor fixes. In the futur, the list of build python version should be computed in a shorter way, using an updated pyversions utility. In the end, very few python system specific code would be necessary, which would help having a clean class an being able to remove a system later if necessary. Thanks. -- Marc Dequ?nes (Duck) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060621/4e859371/attachment.pgp From duck at duckcorp.org Thu Jun 22 07:50:03 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Thu Jun 22 08:16:00 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374809: cdbs: updated python class needed to achieve the transition In-Reply-To: <87sllyd85s.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes's?= message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:07:11 +0200") References: <87sllyd85s.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <87d5d1d3ys.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060622/726c6cf4/attachment.pgp From kraai at ftbfs.org Fri Jun 23 19:54:13 2006 From: kraai at ftbfs.org (Matt Kraai) Date: Fri Jun 23 23:08:27 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#375152: Misspelling of "non-empty" as "nonemtpy" Message-ID: <20060623195413.GA15772@localhost.localdomain> Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060623/0da91b9b/attachment.pgp From duck at duckcorp.org Sat Jun 24 02:36:49 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Sat Jun 24 12:02:31 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374809: cdbs: updated python class needed to achieve the transition In-Reply-To: <87bqsj5nav.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes's?= message of "Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:56:24 +0200") References: <87sllyd85s.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87d5d1d3ys.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87bqsj5nav.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <8764ir5lfi.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060624/057a5c18/attachment.pgp From duck at duckcorp.org Sat Jun 24 01:56:24 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Sat Jun 24 12:02:38 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374809: cdbs: updated python class needed to achieve the transition In-Reply-To: <87d5d1d3ys.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> (Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes's?= message of "Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:50:03 +0200") References: <87sllyd85s.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87d5d1d3ys.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <87bqsj5nav.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Coin, This message to say an updated class is coming, as pyversions was updated and is available in unstable. I also need to bump build-deps to enforce having fixed tools. Stay tuned. This should come tomorrow, and i intend to do a team upload if you are not responsive enought, as this is lengthening the Python transition too much. -- Marc Dequ?nes (Duck) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060624/df3c94bb/attachment.pgp From kraai at ftbfs.org Sat Jun 24 01:22:11 2006 From: kraai at ftbfs.org (Matt Kraai) Date: Sat Jun 24 12:03:06 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#375152: Misspelling of "non-empty" as "nonemtpy" In-Reply-To: <41047.80.226.232.19.1151097887.squirrel@pezone.net> References: <20060623195413.GA15772@localhost.localdomain> <41047.80.226.232.19.1151097887.squirrel@pezone.net> Message-ID: <20060624012211.GA6884@localhost.localdomain> eOn Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:24:47PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Matt Kraai wrote: > > There is a misspelling of "non-empty" as "nonemtpy" in the cdbs > > documentation. The attached patch fixes it. > > "nonempty" is the correct spelling. "non-empty" is wrong. OK. I looked it up on Wikipedia and it contained both, so I went with what seemed to be preferred there. How do you know when to use a hyphen and when not to? -- Matt -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060623/6828d704/attachment.pgp From peter_e at gmx.net Fri Jun 23 21:24:47 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Sat Jun 24 12:03:20 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#375152: Misspelling of "non-empty" as "nonemtpy" In-Reply-To: <20060623195413.GA15772@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060623195413.GA15772@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <41047.80.226.232.19.1151097887.squirrel@pezone.net> Matt Kraai wrote: > There is a misspelling of "non-empty" as "nonemtpy" in the cdbs > documentation. The attached patch fixes it. "nonempty" is the correct spelling. "non-empty" is wrong. From peter_e at gmx.net Sat Jun 24 07:35:40 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Sat Jun 24 12:17:33 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374809: cdbs: updated python class needed to achieve the transition In-Reply-To: <8764ir5lfi.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <87sllyd85s.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87d5d1d3ys.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87bqsj5nav.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <8764ir5lfi.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <35393.80.226.232.19.1151134540.squirrel@pezone.net> Marc Dequ??nes wrote: > No, tomorrow is in half an hour in DL time, this is too late, i need to > go to bed quickly, so here it is. Some technical comments then: Variable assignments that use the $(shell) function should be done using := for performance reasons. Use of the [[ ]] shell operator strikes me as unusual. Why not [ ] ? You seem to have an encoding problem in this line: +#??check if build is possible I'm not a fan of this: + echo "$(cdbs_pycompat)" >debian/pycompat People should write the desired value into the file themselves. We have no business messing with that. From peter_e at gmx.net Sat Jun 24 07:27:26 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Sat Jun 24 12:22:06 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374809: cdbs: updated python class needed to achieve the transition In-Reply-To: <87bqsj5nav.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <87sllyd85s.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87d5d1d3ys.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87bqsj5nav.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <43328.80.226.232.19.1151134046.squirrel@pezone.net> Marc Dequ??nes wrote: > This should come tomorrow, and i intend to do a team upload if you are > not responsive enought, as this is lengthening the Python transition too > much. The current cdbs should go to testing first. The python team is not the only one we have to cater to. The experience of the past week or two makes me wonder just how well this Python transition was planned. How do I know that by the time you have prepared a patch, the policy hasn't changed again already? We cannot be expected to jump in circles at every request within days or hours. When new proposals for features or enhancements come in, we sit back and consider them duly. If you need them tomorrow, you should have planned better yesterday. Again, I have no problem with these changes but we cannot throw away our development process because some people change their mind every few days. From peter_e at gmx.net Sat Jun 24 13:41:48 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Sat Jun 24 13:42:16 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Comments on recent patches Message-ID: <32928.80.226.232.19.1151156508.squirrel@pezone.net> * Enable DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains cdbs-autoupdate. This allows globally enabling the feature (eg. on compiler farms), and still obey Debian Policy by default. I'm personally against this feature because we should be working on getting rid of this ill-designed feature rather than building up an excuse-infrastructure for it. Others may be of different opinion. * Add buildinfo rule. Closes: bug#202873. That rule still contains the same stamp file bug that is explained in the bug. * Resolve per-package DEB_BUILDDIR before running {make,clean}builddir targets in buildcore rule, making it possible to programmatically change DEB_BUILDDIR. * Honour per-package DEB_BUILDDIR in makefile class. Could you explain the purpose of this? Documentation for any of this is still missing as well. We need to make a release soon to get the pending Python updates in, but I'm not confortable with releasing the above features yet. From owner at bugs.debian.org Sat Jun 24 13:48:53 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sat Jun 24 13:54:23 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: tagging 369268, merging 207775 369268 In-Reply-To: <20060624133145.4D13CF1659@colt.pezone.net> References: <20060624133145.4D13CF1659@colt.pezone.net> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 369268 - patch Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > merge 207775 369268 Bug#207775: installs uneeded documentation in debhelper.mk Bug#369268: debhelper.mk: installs common docs instead of docs listed in package.docs Merged 207775 369268. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From hertzog at debian.org Sat Jun 24 13:50:04 2006 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Sat Jun 24 15:02:34 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374809: cdbs: updated python class needed to achieve the transition In-Reply-To: <43328.80.226.232.19.1151134046.squirrel@pezone.net> References: <87sllyd85s.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87d5d1d3ys.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87bqsj5nav.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <43328.80.226.232.19.1151134046.squirrel@pezone.net> Message-ID: <20060624135004.GF19474@ouaza.com> On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The current cdbs should go to testing first. The python team is not the > only one we have to cater to. If you change only the python class, you can reupload with an increased urgency to have it enter testing at the same time than the current version. > The experience of the past week or two makes me wonder just how well this > Python transition was planned. How do I know that by the time you have > prepared a patch, the policy hasn't changed again already? We cannot be The policy hasn't really changed, however python-support has been extended to cover more cases. And this update is to let CDBS user benefit from this enhancement. > expected to jump in circles at every request within days or hours. When > new proposals for features or enhancements come in, we sit back and > consider them duly. If you need them tomorrow, you should have planned > better yesterday. Again, I have no problem with these changes but we > cannot throw away our development process because some people change their > mind every few days. Release early, release often. Considering the python transiton, I don't expect any more changes however. Cheers, -- Rapha?l Hertzog Premier livre fran?ais sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ From ozarow at gmail.com Sat Jun 24 14:57:41 2006 From: ozarow at gmail.com (Piotr Ozarowski) Date: Sat Jun 24 15:44:34 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374809: cdbs: updated python class needed to achieve the transition In-Reply-To: <35393.80.226.232.19.1151134540.squirrel@pezone.net> References: <87sllyd85s.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87d5d1d3ys.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <87bqsj5nav.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <8764ir5lfi.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <35393.80.226.232.19.1151134540.squirrel@pezone.net> Message-ID: <20060624145738.GA25908@pox.one.pl> Please consider adding something similar to attached patch. It adds support for packages that are arch "all" and depend on python version >> current. 163a164,168 > # check if current is in build versions > ifneq ($(cdbs_python_current_version), $(filter $(cdbs_python_current_version), $(shell pyversions -vr))) > cdbs_python_compile_version := $(word 1, $(strip $(sort $(shell pyversions -vr)))) > cdbs_python_build_versions := $(cdbs_python_compile_version) > else 164a170 > endif 181a188,191 > ifneq (, $(cdbs_python_compile_version)) > # TODO: versioned dependency > CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS := $(CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS), python${cdbs_python_compile_version}-dev > else 182a193 > endif 197c208 < cd $(DEB_SRCDIR) && python $(DEB_PYTHON_SETUP_CMD) build $(DEB_PYTHON_BUILD_ARGS) --- > cd $(DEB_SRCDIR) && python$(cdbs_python_compile_version) $(DEB_PYTHON_SETUP_CMD) build $(DEB_PYTHON_BUILD_ARGS) 208c219 < cd $(DEB_SRCDIR) && python $(DEB_PYTHON_SETUP_CMD) install --root=$(DEB_DESTDIR) $(DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS_ALL) --- > cd $(DEB_SRCDIR) && python$(cdbs_python_compile_version) $(DEB_PYTHON_SETUP_CMD) install --root=$(DEB_DESTDIR) $(DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS_ALL) 233c244 < -cd $(DEB_SRCDIR) && python $(DEB_PYTHON_SETUP_CMD) clean $(DEB_PYTHON_CLEAN_ARGS) --- > -cd $(DEB_SRCDIR) && python$(cdbs_python_compile_version) $(DEB_PYTHON_SETUP_CMD) clean $(DEB_PYTHON_CLEAN_ARGS) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060624/f0503a91/attachment.pgp From kov at debian.org Sat Jun 24 20:56:01 2006 From: kov at debian.org (Gustavo Noronha Silva) Date: Sat Jun 24 21:11:04 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373997: closed by Peter Eisentraut (Bug#373997: fixed in cdbs 0.4.42) In-Reply-To: References: <20060616173815.6255.4934.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1151182561.22557.96.camel@localhost.localdomain> reopen 373997 thanks Em Sex, 2006-06-16 ?s 11:35 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System escreveu: > > * Corrected automatic cdbs dependency version (python-distutils.mk) > > (closes: #373653, #373997) Dependency is not the only problem. Gazpacho, for example, requires python2.4, even for building (because the build system requires stuff that's only available to python2.4 and above). So this doesn't work right for it: # build stage common-build-arch common-build-indep:: $(addprefix python-build-stamp-, $(cdbs_python_build_versions)) python-build-stamp-%: ifeq (all, $(cdbs_python_module_arch)) cd $(DEB_SRCDIR) && python $(DEB_PYTHON_SETUP_CMD) build $(DEB_PYTHON_BUILD_ARGS) else cd $(DEB_SRCDIR) && python$* $(DEB_PYTHON_SETUP_CMD) build $(DEB_PYTHON_BUILD_ARGS) endif # archall detection touch $@ The output: make[1]: Saindo do diret?rio `/home/kov/debian/pkg-gnome/packages/unstable/build-area/gazpacho-0.6.6' cd . && python setup.py build --build-base="/home/kov/debian/pkg-gnome/packages/unstable/build-area/gazpacho-0.6.6/./build" Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 5, in ? from kiwi.dist import setup, listfiles, listpackages ImportError: No module named kiwi.dist make: ** [python-build-stamp-2.3] Erro 1 Gapacho really wants 'python2.4' there instead of 'python'. I believe we'll have this problem with other packages. I have patched some packages to simply build with python2.3, but that doesn't scale well, and is simply not possible for gazpacho. See you, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva http://people.debian.org/~kov/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060624/2180aa24/attachment-0001.pgp From owner at bugs.debian.org Sat Jun 24 21:04:40 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sat Jun 24 21:11:22 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: Re: Bug#373997 closed by Peter Eisentraut (Bug#373997: fixed in cdbs 0.4.42) In-Reply-To: <1151182561.22557.96.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1151182561.22557.96.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 373997 Bug#373997: python-distutils.mk: ignores information about minor supported python version 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From dak at ftp-master.debian.org Sun Jun 25 12:18:14 2006 From: dak at ftp-master.debian.org (Archive Administrator) Date: Sun Jun 25 12:18:30 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processing of cdbs_0.4.43_i386.changes Message-ID: cdbs_0.4.43_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdbs_0.4.43.dsc cdbs_0.4.43.tar.gz cdbs_0.4.43_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon From installer at ftp-master.debian.org Sun Jun 25 12:32:11 2006 From: installer at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Sun Jun 25 12:43:28 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] cdbs_0.4.43_i386.changes ACCEPTED Message-ID: Accepted: cdbs_0.4.43.dsc to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.43.dsc cdbs_0.4.43.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.43.tar.gz cdbs_0.4.43_all.deb to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.43_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 373997 374012 374809 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From owner at bugs.debian.org Sun Jun 25 13:03:23 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sun Jun 25 13:12:33 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374012: marked as done (cdbs: $(cdbs_python_current_version) should always be set) References: <87d5d8hokk.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2006 05:32:12 -0700 with message-id and subject line Bug#374012: fixed in cdbs 0.4.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Marc =?utf-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck) Subject: cdbs: $(cdbs_python_current_version) should always be set Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:45:31 +0200 Size: 2703 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060625/f99756ea/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: =?utf-8?b?TWFyYyBEZXF1w6huZXMgKER1Y2sp?= Subject: Bug#374012: fixed in cdbs 0.4.43 Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 05:32:12 -0700 Size: 3193 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060625/f99756ea/attachment-0001.mht From owner at bugs.debian.org Sun Jun 25 13:03:21 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sun Jun 25 13:13:27 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373997: marked as done (python-distutils.mk: ignores information about minor supported python version) References: <20060616173815.6255.4934.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2006 05:32:12 -0700 with message-id and subject line Bug#373997: fixed in cdbs 0.4.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Gustavo Noronha Silva Subject: python-distutils.mk: ignores information about minor supported python version Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:38:15 -0300 Size: 3533 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060625/a136616e/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: =?utf-8?b?TWFyYyBEZXF1w6huZXMgKER1Y2sp?= Subject: Bug#373997: fixed in cdbs 0.4.43 Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 05:32:12 -0700 Size: 3168 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060625/a136616e/attachment-0001.mht From owner at bugs.debian.org Sun Jun 25 13:03:25 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sun Jun 25 13:14:27 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#374809: marked as done (cdbs: updated python class needed to achieve the transition) References: <87sllyd85s.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2006 05:32:12 -0700 with message-id and subject line Bug#374809: fixed in cdbs 0.4.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Marc =?utf-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck) Subject: cdbs: updated python class needed to achieve the transition Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:07:11 +0200 Size: 2993 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060625/cf036a31/attachment-0002.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: =?utf-8?b?TWFyYyBEZXF1w6huZXMgKER1Y2sp?= Subject: Bug#374809: fixed in cdbs 0.4.43 Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 05:32:12 -0700 Size: 3193 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060625/cf036a31/attachment-0003.mht From ozarow at gmail.com Sun Jun 25 13:56:43 2006 From: ozarow at gmail.com (Piotr Ozarowski) Date: Sun Jun 25 14:13:55 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373997: fixed in cdbs 0.4.43 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20060625135640.GA21235@pox.one.pl> reopen 373997 thanks > + honnour minor supported version (thanks to Piotr Ozarowski for the > original patch) (Closes: #373997). It's still not fixed, please take a look at whole patch from #374809 -- -=[ Piotr O?arowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060625/9472b8e1/attachment.pgp From owner at bugs.debian.org Sun Jun 25 14:03:49 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sun Jun 25 14:17:26 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: Re: Bug#373997: fixed in cdbs 0.4.43 In-Reply-To: <20060625135640.GA21235@pox.one.pl> References: <20060625135640.GA21235@pox.one.pl> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 373997 Bug#373997: python-distutils.mk: ignores information about minor supported python version 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From owner at bugs.debian.org Sun Jun 25 14:49:00 2006 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sun Jun 25 14:50:49 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#373997: marked as done (python-distutils.mk: ignores information about minor supported python version) References: <20060625141621.GF8425@pox.one.pl> <20060616173815.6255.4934.reportbug@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:16:21 +0200 with message-id <20060625141621.GF8425@pox.one.pl> and subject line Bug#373997: fixed in cdbs 0.4.43 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Gustavo Noronha Silva Subject: python-distutils.mk: ignores information about minor supported python version Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:38:15 -0300 Size: 3533 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060625/0184ac70/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Piotr Ozarowski Subject: Re: Bug#373997: fixed in cdbs 0.4.43 Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:16:21 +0200 Size: 2270 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060625/0184ac70/attachment-0001.mht From peter_e at gmx.net Sun Jun 25 16:06:20 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Sun Jun 25 16:07:17 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] cdbs_0.4.43_i386.changes ACCEPTED In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <34124.80.226.167.251.1151251580.squirrel@pezone.net> You have got to be kidding me. What about coordinating uploads? When people express reservations, what about responding first? We have a subversion repository with different code; please provide a patch to install a branch and merge the code together. This is not the way we can operate here. From aj at andaco.de Mon Jun 26 07:27:36 2006 From: aj at andaco.de (Andreas Jochens) Date: Mon Jun 26 07:40:57 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#375464: cdbs: FTBFS: gs: command not found Message-ID: Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.43 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'cdbs' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: ################################################################################ RELEASE : 0.8pre1 VERSION : $Id: VERSION.xml,v 1.6 2004/01/31 12:47:11 j-devenish Exp $ TAG : DB2LATEX_0_8PRE1 WWW : http://db2latex.sourceforge.net SUMMARY : http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/db2latex AUTHOR : Ramon Casellas casellas@infres.enst.fr AUTHOR : James Devenish j-devenish@users.sf.net USING : libxslt/xsltproc ################################################################################ dot -Tps2 -o buildcore.eps buildcore.dot -Gsize='6,10' epstopdf --outfile=buildcore.pdf buildcore.eps sh: gs: command not found make[3]: *** [buildcore.pdf] Broken pipe make[3]: Leaving directory `/cdbs-0.4.43/doc' Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'gs-common' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/cdbs-0.4.43/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/cdbs-0.4.43/debian/control 2006-05-24 21:44:32.000000000 +0000 +++ ./debian/control 2006-06-26 06:36:59.000000000 +0000 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: CDBS Hackers -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 5), graphviz, realpath, fakeroot, python-dev, python2.3, python2.4, libxml2-utils, xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, db2latex-xsl, tetex-extra, ant, kaffe, sharutils +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 5), gs-common, graphviz, realpath, fakeroot, python-dev, python2.3, python2.4, libxml2-utils, xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, db2latex-xsl, tetex-extra, ant, kaffe, sharutils Uploaders: Colin Walters , Jeff Bailey , Jonas Smedegaard , Chris Cheney , Stefan Gybas , Robert Millan , Marc Dequènes (Duck) , Peter Eisentraut Standards-Version: 3.7.2 From peter_e at gmx.net Mon Jun 26 08:06:55 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Mon Jun 26 08:21:22 2006 Subject: Bug#375464: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#375464: cdbs: FTBFS: gs: command not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200606261006.56502.peter_e@gmx.net> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2006 09:27 schrieb Andreas Jochens: > epstopdf --outfile=buildcore.pdf buildcore.eps > sh: gs: command not found > make[3]: *** [buildcore.pdf] Broken pipe > make[3]: Leaving directory `/cdbs-0.4.43/doc' > > Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'gs-common' > to debian/control. Isn't that a bug in whatever package supplies epstopdf not having proper dependencies? From duck at duckcorp.org Mon Jun 26 09:49:11 2006 From: duck at duckcorp.org (Marc =?utf-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck)) Date: Mon Jun 26 09:49:39 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] cdbs_0.4.43_i386.changes ACCEPTED In-Reply-To: <34124.80.226.167.251.1151251580.squirrel@pezone.net> (Peter Eisentraut's message of "Sun, 25 Jun 2006 18:06:20 +0200 (CEST)") References: <34124.80.226.167.251.1151251580.squirrel@pezone.net> Message-ID: <87r71c2qnc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Coin, "Peter Eisentraut" writes: > You have got to be kidding me. What about coordinating uploads? When > people express reservations, what about responding first? We have a > subversion repository with different code; please provide a patch to > install a branch and merge the code together. This is not the way we can > operate here. It seemed you were not against a team upload but had some concerns, about the 'debian/pycompat' overwrite mostly, and i took all your remarks into account and modified accordingly. I saw nothing that needed to be discussed, as i agreed with all your remarks. For the subversion repository, i asked for access, but Jeff seems to have other plans on how we should organize it, so i've still got no access. Now, you probably don't understand the whole Python problem, and how much difficult is the situation. For the code integration in respect to the CDBS quality and general behavior, you've got your word, and all your remarks were taken into account, but for the Python part only Python maintainers can decide what should be done according to their decisions and the policy. This was an URGENCY UPLOAD, which was necessary because we cannot wait until the way we can operate on the source of cdbs is organized. I recommended Jeff to give you admin access, so you can act as RM, but you should now organize developments, this won't build up by itself. -- Marc Dequ?nes (Duck) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060626/b95e5657/attachment-0001.pgp From peter_e at gmx.net Mon Jun 26 10:05:39 2006 From: peter_e at gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) Date: Mon Jun 26 10:07:13 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] cdbs_0.4.43_i386.changes ACCEPTED In-Reply-To: <87r71c2qnc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <34124.80.226.167.251.1151251580.squirrel@pezone.net> <87r71c2qnc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <200606261205.40737.peter_e@gmx.net> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2006 11:49 schrieb Marc Dequ?nes: > It seemed you were not against a team upload but had some concerns, > about the 'debian/pycompat' overwrite mostly, and i took all your > remarks into account and modified accordingly. I saw nothing that needed > to be discussed, as i agreed with all your remarks. Those changes were probably OK, and I have no problem with you doing the upload. I'm just a little bit puzzled about how we're going to merge this into the SVN repository. I suggest that we roll back the existing changes to version 0.4.42 (those changes need more discussion anyway, IMHO), install your patch to version 0.4.43, and then leave it there. I also suggest for everyone that we don't do any aggressive changes for a while to leave room for quick uploads during the Python transition. I have seen some additional feedback on some Python-related bugs since the upload, but you are probably better equipped to comment on them. > I recommended Jeff to give you admin access, so you can act as RM, but > you should now organize developments, this won't build up by itself. Maybe the present alioth admin can comment on how to proceed if the project admins have gone missing. From hertzog at debian.org Mon Jun 26 10:08:24 2006 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Mon Jun 26 10:12:00 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] cdbs_0.4.43_i386.changes ACCEPTED In-Reply-To: <87r71c2qnc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> References: <34124.80.226.167.251.1151251580.squirrel@pezone.net> <87r71c2qnc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> Message-ID: <20060626100824.GA13996@ouaza.com> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Marc Dequ?nes wrote: > Now, you probably don't understand the whole Python problem, and how > much difficult is the situation. For the code integration in respect to > the CDBS quality and general behavior, you've got your word, and all your > remarks were taken into account, but for the Python part only Python > maintainers can decide what should be done according to their decisions > and the policy. This was an URGENCY UPLOAD, which was necessary because > we cannot wait until the way we can operate on the source of cdbs is > organized. I must admit that I've put some pressure on Marc so that he uploads sooner rather than later. Don't blame him too much for that. Now you can continue your team-work in a less "expeditive" way. Don't reject Marc's help because of this upload. Thanks, -- Rapha?l Hertzog Premier livre fran?ais sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ From hertzog at debian.org Mon Jun 26 10:32:59 2006 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Mon Jun 26 10:35:45 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] cdbs_0.4.43_i386.changes ACCEPTED In-Reply-To: <200606261205.40737.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <34124.80.226.167.251.1151251580.squirrel@pezone.net> <87r71c2qnc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <200606261205.40737.peter_e@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20060626103259.GA14245@ouaza.com> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > I recommended Jeff to give you admin access, so you can act as RM, but > > you should now organize developments, this won't build up by itself. > > Maybe the present alioth admin can comment on how to proceed if the project > admins have gone missing. I can add you if you want but I'd rather have statements from more than member of the team... who else think that I should give Peter admin rights on alioth ? CCing Jeff and Colin so that they give their opinion as well. Cheers, -- Rapha?l Hertzog Premier livre fran?ais sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ From aj at andaco.de Mon Jun 26 10:14:19 2006 From: aj at andaco.de (Andreas Jochens) Date: Mon Jun 26 10:54:04 2006 Subject: Bug#375464: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#375464: cdbs: FTBFS: gs: command not found In-Reply-To: <200606261006.56502.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <200606261006.56502.peter_e@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20060626101419.GA22189@andaco.de> Hello, On 06-Jun-26 10:06, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Montag, 26. Juni 2006 09:27 schrieb Andreas Jochens: > > epstopdf --outfile=buildcore.pdf buildcore.eps > > sh: gs: command not found > > make[3]: *** [buildcore.pdf] Broken pipe > > make[3]: Leaving directory `/cdbs-0.4.43/doc' > > > > Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'gs-common' > > to debian/control. > > Isn't that a bug in whatever package supplies epstopdf not having proper > dependencies? epstopdf is part of tetex-bin which only suggests gs but does not depend on it. This is probably because tetex-bin can be used without having gs installed. I am not sure if it would be a good thing to make tetex-bin depend on gs. Regards Andreas Jochens From dr at jones.dk Mon Jun 26 10:56:14 2006 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Mon Jun 26 10:56:48 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] cdbs_0.4.43_i386.changes ACCEPTED In-Reply-To: <200606261205.40737.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <34124.80.226.167.251.1151251580.squirrel@pezone.net> <87r71c2qnc.fsf@Orfeo.duckcorp.org> <200606261205.40737.peter_e@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20060626125614.37f30f39.dr@jones.dk> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:05:39 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I suggest that we roll back the existing changes to version 0.4.42 > (those changes need more discussion anyway, IMHO), install your patch > to version 0.4.43, and then leave it there. Rolling back my changes is fine with me. I am pretty busy currently so would appreciate if someone else could do that - but if noone steps in then I take it on as my responsibility! Any volunteers? > I also suggest for everyone that we don't do any aggressive changes > for a while to leave room for quick uploads during the Python > transition. I have seen some additional feedback on some > Python-related bugs since the upload, but you are probably better > equipped to comment on them. The only comment I noticed was later retracted. but in any case, my improvements can wait. I just wanted to share my improvements that I've used for awhile with the world... :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er n?r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20060626/9f076bc9/attachment.pgp From willpet at camaracs.org Mon Jun 26 11:58:15 2006 From: willpet at camaracs.org (williams peters) Date: Mon Jun 26 11:59:39 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] Project for mutual benefit. Message-ID: <1563.213.255.211.242.1151323095.squirrel@camaracs.org> From: Mr Williams Peters Ministry of Health Manchester United Kindom I am the Director in the Directorate of Health Financing in the Ministry of Health in United Kindom.We had a bugdetary allocation of $22.5 MillionUSD by the government in February,2002 to research in finding a local cure to the sickle cell disease.I write to solicit your assistance in a project of mutual benefit. We funded a team of clinical pharmacologists to conduct a research on the effect of a "local plant extract" on Sickle Cell Disease in United Kindom.The research has since been concluded (specifically in December 2005) Of the total amount given to us for the research purposes we only expended US$8.623Million leaving a balance of US$13.877 Million Dollars. I am contacting you with a view that you can provide a safe haven for the balance of this fund that is presently in a bank in Europe. I have put in over 25 years of my life into working for the government and I do not have anything to show for it, hence I see this opportunity as a God sent one. I sincerely hope that you will be of assistance to me. I implore you to treat this mail as confidential as possible as I am still serving, though I intend to retire in the first quarter of next year. If you are not in a position to assist us, do not respond to this mail and I apologize for taking your time. Best regards, From uk2006lottopromo at adinet.com.uy Mon Jun 26 19:39:15 2006 From: uk2006lottopromo at adinet.com.uy (UK NATIONAL LOTTERY) Date: Mon Jun 26 19:46:04 2006 Subject: [Build-common-hackers] ***CONGRATULATIONS YOUR HAVE WON*** THE UK LOTTERY PROMOTION********** Message-ID: <29015772.1151350755188.JavaMail.tomcat@fe-ps02> FROM: UNITED KINGDOM NATIONAL LOTTERY. UK NATIONAL LOTTERY HEADQUARTERS: P O Box 1010 Liverpool, L70 1NL UNITED KINGDOM (Customer Services) WINNING NOTICE FOR CATEGORY "A" WINNER BONUS LOTTERY PROMOTION PRIZE AWARDS WINNING NOTIFICATION Dear Lucky Winner, We are pleased to inform you of the result of the just concluded annual final draws of UNITED KINGDOM NATIONAL LOTTERY International Lottery Programs. The online cyber lotto draws was conducted from an exclusive list of 21,000 e-mail addresses of individual and corporate bodies picked by an advanced automated random computer search from the internet, no tickets were sold. After this automated computer ballot, your e-mail address emerged as one of two winners in the category "A" with the following winning information: REF No: UKNL-L/200-26937 BATCH No: 2005MJL-01 TICKET No: 20511465463-7644 SERIAL No: S/N-00168 LUCKY No: 887-13-865-37-10-83 You as well as the other winner are therefore to receive a cash prize of ?900,000 Pounds (Nine Hundred Thousand Pounds Sterling) each from the total payout. Your prize award has been insured with your e-mail address and will be transferred to you upon meeting our requirements, statutory obligations, verifications, validations and satisfactory report. To begin the claims processing of your prize winnings you are advised to contact our licensed and accredited oversea claims agent for category "A" winners with the information below: To file for your claim, please contact the processing agent; Overseas Claims Unit United Kingdom Lottery Fiduciary Contact Person: Mr. James Knott Email: Fiduciarydpt_jamesknott@yahoo.co.uk Phone Number:+447024070596 OR +447024070596 Remember to quote your reference information in all correspondence. You are to keep all lotto information away from the general public especially your reference and ticket numbers. (This is important as a case of double claims will not be entertained). Please note; you are hereby advice to send the asignned Fudiciray Agent details below for Processing of your Claims; (1). FULL NAME (2). FULL ADDRESS (3). NATIONALITY (4). DATE OF BIRTH (5). OCCUPATION (6). ANNUAL INCOME (7). WINNING EMAIL (8). TELEPHONE NUMBER (9). DATE OF WINNING NOTIFICATION (10). SEX (11). TOTAL AMOUNT WON (12). MARITAL STATUS Send Reply to the processing agent:- Fiduciarydpt_jamesknott@yahoo.co.uk Congratulations once more from our members of staff and thank you for being part of our promotional program. CONGRATULATIONS!!! At your disposal, we remain. Sincerely Yours, Bertron Hill The National Lottery P O Box 1010 Liverpool, L70 1NL UNITED KINGDOM NOTE: Anybody under the age of 17 and members of the affiliate agencies are automatically not allowed to participate in this program