[Build-common-hackers] Bug#523642: Bug#523642: Bug#523642: overrides CFLAGS too agressively
dr at jones.dk
Sat Apr 11 20:06:45 UTC 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:07:07PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 06:13:58PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I do not say that CDBS is correct or not in its current behaviour,
>> just that it has a well defined vurrent behaviour that users rely on
>> (whether or not they are aware of it).
>> I have tagged this as wontfix for that reason. Please note that even
>> if this means I do not expect this to change (or at least not soon -
>> it is possible to change when we decide to bump ABI at some point, if
>> ever), I am still interested in discussing it!
>Why not use an environment variable then?
Like you quoted right above: Because CDBS is in active use with current
Does that somehow not make sense?
>> Could you perhaps provide some good examples of upstream software
>> needing custom CFLAGS that is cumbersome to work around using CDBS?
>Yeah, Linux modules. Or plugins in general for all sort of programs.
>They're usually very picky when it comes to CFLAGS.
I understand that they are picky about CFLAGS, but can't their CFLAGS be
re-applied when using CDBS?
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Build-common-hackers