[buildd-tools-devel] Bug#598054: Bug#598054: Bug#598054: sbuild(1) manpage says that ~/.sbuildrc is obligatory
Roger Leigh
rleigh at codelibre.net
Mon Nov 1 17:20:55 UTC 2010
tags 598054 + fixed-upstream pending
thanks
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:26:47PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:56:06PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > Package: sbuild
> > Version: 0.60.0-2
> > Severity: minor
> >
> > According to the manual page, "sbuild will not run without a valid
> > ~/.sbuildrc."
> >
> > Well, this doesn't seem to be true: I'm happily using sbuild without any
> > ~/.sbuildrc.
>
> Thanks for letting us know. I think this is a case where the
> documentation refers to historical restrictions which are no
> longer true.
Fixed in git, and will be uploaded soon.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/buildd-tools-devel/attachments/20101101/f5a1aff5/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Buildd-tools-devel
mailing list