[buildd-tools-devel] Bug#559655: Bug#559655: Bug#559655: sbuild: dealing with experimental is (less of?) a PITA

[Roger Leigh]

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 02:05:22AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> (w00t, what a delay…)
> 
> Marc Brockschmidt <marc at marcbrockschmidt.de> (19/03/2010):
> > Hum, this sounds weird. Are you sure that you are using the current
> > packages from the buildd branch and *not* the released package?
> 
> I'm sure I (am|was back then) using the released package, and *not*
> packages from the buildd branch. That was for an incremental d-i
> build, not for stuff on buildds; hence my using unstable's packages.
> 
> > Since the upload to unstable, Modestas Vainius <modax at debian.org>
> > contributed patches to help work around this problem (by massaging
> > aptitude to drag in more packages instead of giving up).
> 
> I guess we'll see how it goes after the recent modification you made
> for the recent aptitude configuration option change. Thanks for the
> clarification about master vs. buildd branches anyway.

Hi guys,

Just wanted to check if this bug Re: experimental building is still
an issue, or if there were any changes still required?  If not, can
I close the bug?


Thanks,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/buildd-tools-devel/attachments/20101101/120da564/attachment.pgp>