[buildd-tools-devel] Bug#836940: marked as done (cowbuilder, sbuild: should behave identically in regard to default gnupg installation)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner at bugs.debian.org
Thu Sep 8 11:45:04 UTC 2016


Your message dated Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:41:30 +0000
with message-id <20160908114129.m3zzevnmzbeqdc75 at chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#836940: cowbuilder, sbuild: should behave identically in regard to default gnupg installation
has caused the Debian Bug report #836940,
regarding cowbuilder, sbuild: should behave identically in regard to default gnupg installation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
836940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836940
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Markus Koschany <apo at debian.org>
Subject: cowbuilder, sbuild: should behave identically in regard to default gnupg installation
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:28:41 +0200
Size: 5442
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/buildd-tools-devel/attachments/20160908/72ecf16f/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Mattia Rizzolo <mattia at debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#836940: cowbuilder, sbuild: should behave identically in regard to default gnupg installation
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:41:30 +0000
Size: 5347
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/buildd-tools-devel/attachments/20160908/72ecf16f/attachment-0001.mht>


More information about the Buildd-tools-devel mailing list