From hertzog at debian.org Wed Nov 4 18:36:15 2009 From: hertzog at debian.org (Raphael Hertzog) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:36:15 +0100 Subject: [Calendarserver-maintainers] Bug#484967: Source format "3.0 (quilt)" allowed in testing/unstable Message-ID: <20091104183615.GA8865@rivendell> [ Same message sent in bcc to all remaining "FTBFS with new source format" ] Hello, the new source format "3.0 (quilt)" is now allowed in testing/unstable and having all packages buildable with the new format is a release goal (http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/NewDebFormats). Thus it would be nice to see this bug fixed. If you want, you can directly fix the bug by switching the package to use the new format. In order to help you in this process, I have put some advice on the project page and will continue to complete it with answers to your questions: http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0#FAQ If you need help, please tag the bug help and someone might provide you a patch. Ask explicitely if you want a patch to convert the package to the new source format. The few packages that contain multiple tarballs in the .orig tarball should (ideally) be converted to the new format by using the multiple upstream tarball feature that it offers. I also recommend switching to quilt if you use another patch system since it's now the patch system that is endorsed by the dpkg maintainers. If you have questions, please ask. Cheers, -- Rapha?l Hertzog From s.marechal at jejik.com Wed Nov 18 09:39:16 2009 From: s.marechal at jejik.com (Sander Marechal) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:39:16 +0100 Subject: [Calendarserver-maintainers] Bug#522063: Progress?? Message-ID: <4B03C0C4.5030403@jejik.com> Any progress on this? I'd love to see 2.3 packaged because it solves bug #529210. The new CalendarServer doesn't need a specially patched Twisted anymore. Kind regards, -- Sander Marechal From agx at sigxcpu.org Wed Nov 18 09:59:33 2009 From: agx at sigxcpu.org (Guido =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=BCnther?=) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:59:33 +0100 Subject: [Calendarserver-maintainers] Bug#522063: Bug#522063: Progress?? In-Reply-To: <4B03C0C4.5030403@jejik.com> References: <4B03C0C4.5030403@jejik.com> Message-ID: <20091118095933.GA14118@bogon.sigxcpu.org> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:39:16AM +0100, Sander Marechal wrote: > Any progress on this? I'd love to see 2.3 packaged because it solves bug > #529210. The new CalendarServer doesn't need a specially patched Twisted > anymore. Nobody is actively working on it as far as I know. The git is on alioth for everybody who wants to help out. Cheers, -- Guido From apm at one.com Thu Nov 19 11:19:07 2009 From: apm at one.com (Peter Mogensen) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:19:07 +0100 Subject: [Calendarserver-maintainers] Bug#522063: Progress?? Message-ID: <4B0529AB.20500@one.com> Sander Marechal wrote: > The new CalendarServer doesn't need a specially patched Twisted > anymore. Is that true? Both CalendarServer 2.3 and trunk depends on the dav-take-two-3081-4 branch of Twisted. That's not the Twisted in Lenny (8.1) and Twisted in sid is 8.2, but Twisted.web2 is 8.1 and web2.dav has been removed from mainline Twisted Web2 - at least temporarily. ...AFAICT Of course it would be very nice to solve this problem so calendarserver was able to use the standard Debian Twisted. /Peter From apm at one.com Tue Nov 24 16:09:16 2009 From: apm at one.com (Peter Mogensen) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:09:16 +0100 Subject: [Calendarserver-maintainers] Bug#522063: Bug#522063: Progress?? Message-ID: <4B0C052C.6010307@one.com> Guido G?nther wrote: > Nobody is actively working on it as far as I know. The git is on > alioth for everybody who wants to help out. I suppose part of the problem is what to do about CalendarServer use of of Twisted and the state of Twisted.web2 ? Are there any official plan from either Apple, the python-twisted-web2 maintainer, or you how to move forward? It seems to me that the CalendarServer developers are the only ones working on the branch of Twisted containing web2. /Peter From panizzon at woody.ch Sat Nov 28 19:10:02 2009 From: panizzon at woody.ch (Benoit Panizzon) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:10:02 +0100 Subject: [Calendarserver-maintainers] Bug#558423: calendarserver: Unable to PUT to non-file Message-ID: <20091128191002.18877.12344.reportbug@akela.scout.ch> Package: calendarserver Version: 1.2.dfsg-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi there I did try to install the calendar server on two machines under 'etch' and 'lenny'. On the later one I did a minimum change of the config, just removed the binding to 'localhost' to be able to access my server from outside. Still I can reproduce the Problem: 2009-11-28 20:01:47+0100 [-] [caldav-8008] [HTTPChannel,2,IP] GET /calendars/users/admin/calendar/ HTTP/1.1 2009-11-28 20:02:00+0100 [-] [caldav-8008] [HTTPChannel,4,IP] PUT /calendars/users/admin/calendar/ HTTP/1.1 2009-11-28 20:02:00+0100 [-] [caldav-8008] [HTTPChannel,4,IP] 'Unable to PUT to non-file: /var/spool/caldavd/calendars/__uids__/38eae584-2b75-582b-a058-018391d1003f/calendar' After some time googleing and trying to find helpfull documentation on how to set access rights etc, it looks like some parts of twisted.web try to access a directory as a file... Any idea how to resolve that problem? -Benoit- -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.3 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages calendarserver depends on: ii adduser 3.110 add and remove users and groups ii lsb-base 3.2-20 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii python 2.5.2-3 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-central 0.6.8 register and build utility for Pyt ii python-dateutil 1.4.1-2 powerful extensions to the standar ii python-kerberos 1.0+svn2455-1 A GSSAPI interface module for Pyth ii python-openssl 0.7-2 Python wrapper around the OpenSSL ii python-pysqlite2 2.4.1-1 Python interface to SQLite 3 ii python-twisted-calendar 0.2.0.svn19773-5 Twisted components for Apple's Cal ii python-vobject 0.6.0-1 parse iCalendar and VCards in Pyth ii python-xattr 0.4-4 module for manipulating filesystem ii python-xml 0.8.4-10.1 XML tools for Python ii ssl-cert 1.0.23 simple debconf wrapper for OpenSSL calendarserver recommends no packages. Versions of packages calendarserver suggests: pn python-pydirector (no description available) -- no debconf information From panizzon at woody.ch Sat Nov 28 20:32:42 2009 From: panizzon at woody.ch (Benoit Panizzon) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:32:42 +0100 Subject: [Calendarserver-maintainers] Bug#558423: Acknowledgement (calendarserver: Unable to PUT to non-file) In-Reply-To: References: <20091128191002.18877.12344.reportbug@akela.scout.ch> Message-ID: <200911282132.42442.panizzon@woody.ch> Hello You can close the bug... (well or consider it as a documentation bug...) /usr/share/doc/calendarserver/README.Debian http://localhost:8008/calendars/users//calendar/ should state, that you should get the "Calendar homes:" URL and add something like my-calendar.ics at the end. After playing a bit more around with Apple iCAL I found out that a user could have multiple calendars on the server. So you have to specify a file and not just the directory. This was why I kept getting the error that the server did try to access a directory as a file. -Benoit- From owner at bugs.debian.org Sun Nov 29 11:36:19 2009 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:36:19 +0000 Subject: [Calendarserver-maintainers] Bug#558423: marked as done (calendarserver: Unable to PUT to non-file) References: <20091129113310.GA2049@bogon.sigxcpu.org> <20091128191002.18877.12344.reportbug@akela.scout.ch> Message-ID: Your message dated Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:33:10 +0100 with message-id <20091129113310.GA2049 at bogon.sigxcpu.org> and subject line Re: [Calendarserver-maintainers] Bug#558423: Acknowledgement (calendarserver: Unable to PUT to non-file) has caused the Debian Bug report #558423, regarding calendarserver: Unable to PUT to non-file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 558423: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558423 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Benoit Panizzon Subject: calendarserver: Unable to PUT to non-file Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:10:02 +0100 Size: 4512 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= Subject: Re: [Calendarserver-maintainers] Bug#558423: Acknowledgement (calendarserver: Unable to PUT to non-file) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:33:10 +0100 Size: 3257 URL: