[D-community-discuss] choosing the right CMS
Holger Levsen
debian at layer-acht.org
Tue Mar 6 18:25:29 CET 2007
Hi,
most things stripped, as they were already solved or commented on.
On Monday 05 March 2007 18:43, Chris Lale wrote:
> The main problem with any
> wiki is not so much security as _spam_.
Right. I expect we will need to fight that :)
> This is a revision control link is a useful feature if you are going to
> be developing software or Debian-doc/Linux-doc type documentation. (Have
> you got ikiwiki "history working"? I have not been successful yet.)
It's also useful for texts or policies about debian-community.org itself and
the contributors pages. Basically revision control is good for everything (it
should just be hidden from the user (workflow) :)
> > - it's a young (still small) and active project.
> MediaWiki is a mature (and large) and active project!
Yes :)
> Perhaps it would be possible to run a separate ikiwiki for each language
> and have inter-wiki links? (This is an approach used by MediaWiki.)
Yes, maybe. I want to tackle this problem later and concentrate on first
things first. (And yes, ikiwiki supports interwiki-links.)
> I think the choice of wiki software depends on the _purpose_ of the wiki.
I'd say we will have many purposes...
> If the purpose is to develop documentation, MediaWiki has these useful
> features:
> * produces TOC automatically.
> * produces optional numbered headings automatically.
> * No need for CamelCase when creating links.
> * Allows namespaces.
what do you mean by that?
> * Allows links to individual section, not just pages.
> * Allows transclusion of atomic nodes - could be a single word or a
> whole section - into pages.
> * Allows inclusion of graphics eg screenshots.
> * Allows subpages
> * Allows classification of pages into categories so that you can have
> category views (eg for level of difficulty, particular distribution,
> type of installation (eg desktop, mail server, webserver), etc.
> * has good internal search (title and text).
>
> It also has features that make it accessible and easier to manage a
> large wiki:
> * Editor toolbar
> * anti-spam features and spam blacklisting
> * email notification
> * multilanguage support
> * third-party plugins ("extensions")
> * RSS feeds
> * utf8-support
That's quite a good list. I'll try to let someone who knows ikiwiki comment on
it.
> I wonder whether the choice of software would be easier when the
> objectives of the project and the purpose of the wiki are clearer?
*nods*
But to work on that, I'd like to have a wiki soon, to collect ideas and work
on them ;)
regards,
Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/d-community-discuss/attachments/20070306/617b098b/attachment.pgp
More information about the D-community-discuss
mailing list