systemd (was ... Re: Article on swift, responsive computers)
Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net
Tue Jun 17 04:34:27 UTC 2014
"6 days ago
v214 …
cd14eda zip tar.gz
20 days ago
v213 …
c9679c6 zip tar.gz
on Mar 26
v212 …
2fa495c zip tar.gz" - https://github.com/systemd/systemd/releases
They are that good, within a few days there's a new tested stable
release?
[rocketmouse at archlinux ~]$ pacman -Q systemd
systemd 213-9
Do you know what the -9 is fore?
[rocketmouse at archlinux ~]$ sudo downgrade systemd
[sudo] password for rocketmouse:
Available packages:
1) systemd-213-9-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (local)
2) systemd-213-9-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
3) systemd-213-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
4) systemd-213-5-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
5) systemd-212-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
6) systemd-212-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
7) systemd-212-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz (remote)
[snip]
Take an educated guess ;).
Usually stable versions from upstream soon went from testing to the
normal repository for real rolling releases as Arch Linux is. I can not
see 214, but it was released 6 days ago. The version in Arch's testing
already is 214-2.
^^^ -2
Debian sid:
systemd (204-10 and others)
^^^ -10 and still the obsolete 204
Debian experimental:
Package: systemd (208-1)
^^^ onbsolet
Compare it with less complex software, upstream doesn't release a
"stable" version every few days.
More information about the D-community-offtopic
mailing list