From jason at jpleau.ca Mon Mar 2 04:48:17 2015 From: jason at jpleau.ca (Jason Pleau) Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 23:48:17 -0500 Subject: [debhelper-devel] Bug#779471: Bug#779471: dh_installchangelogs: please add CHANGES.md as an upstream changelog In-Reply-To: <20150301090601.GN16016@sym.noone.org> References: <20150301035800.3659.90880.reportbug@goldeneye> <20150301090601.GN16016@sym.noone.org> Message-ID: <54F3EB91.6090706@jpleau.ca> Hello Axel, Thanks for the quick reply! On 01/03/15 04:06 AM, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Jason Pleau wrote: >> Several projects that are hosted on Github use markdown files (.md) as their >> README and changelogs. > > Yeah, you also see .markdown and .mdwn as suffixes. Not as common as > .md, but still common. > > At least the usage of README.md already caused confusion and bug > reports in Debian, see https://bugs.debian.org/678630 -- but since > dh_installdocs doesn't have such an automatism, there's no need to > discuss the best solution for that. > >> CHANGES.md is used by a few projects, and it would be nice to have this file >> automatically picked up as an upstream changelog. > > I fully agree and have committed and pushed your changes. Thanks for > your contribution. Awesome, thanks :) > > I've also checked for occurrences of CHANGES.mdwn, CHANGES.markdown, > changelog.mdwn and changelog.markdown and found a few: > > CHANGES.mdwn = 0 Packages: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3ACHANGES.mdwn%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > CHANGES.markdown = 1 Package: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3ACHANGES.markdown%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > ChangeLog.mdwn = 0 Packages: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3AChangeLog.mdwn%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > ChangeLog.markdown = 0 Packages: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3AChangeLog.markdown%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > HISTORY.mdwn = 0 Packages: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3AHISTRORY.mdwn%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > HISTORY.markdown = 0 Packages: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3AHISTRORY.markdown%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > > (I also checked some other capitalizations of "ChangeLog" and > "HISTORY" which seemed common or at least possible to me. No hits > there either.) > > Then I searched a little bit with DuckDuckGo and found indeed some > more occurrences, even by an DD: > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22ChangeLog.mdwn%22+-ikiwiki > > "history.mdwn" also has a few hits: > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22HISTORY.mdwn%22+-ikiwiki+-git-annex > > CHANGES.markdown even a few more: > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22CHANGES.markdown%22+-ikiwiki+-git-annex+-recentchanges > > Another common suffix for such files seem to be "rst" (IIRC > ReStructuredText coming from the Python world): > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22CHANGES.rst%22 > http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3ACHANGES.rst%20hange/page_0 > > The latter lists 60 current packages. So I'll soon add ".rst" as > changelog suffix to look for, but I'm rather hesitating to add ".mdwn" > or ".markdown". > > Regards, Axel > Good catch on those extra files. I would personally add .markdown, but not .mdwn (I did not even know this was a thing !) Cheers -- Jason Pleau From jason at jpleau.ca Mon Mar 2 04:48:17 2015 From: jason at jpleau.ca (Jason Pleau) Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 23:48:17 -0500 Subject: [debhelper-devel] Bug#779471: Bug#779471: dh_installchangelogs: please add CHANGES.md as an upstream changelog In-Reply-To: <20150301090601.GN16016@sym.noone.org> References: <20150301035800.3659.90880.reportbug@goldeneye> <20150301090601.GN16016@sym.noone.org> Message-ID: <54F3EB91.6090706@jpleau.ca> Hello Axel, Thanks for the quick reply! On 01/03/15 04:06 AM, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Jason Pleau wrote: >> Several projects that are hosted on Github use markdown files (.md) as their >> README and changelogs. > > Yeah, you also see .markdown and .mdwn as suffixes. Not as common as > .md, but still common. > > At least the usage of README.md already caused confusion and bug > reports in Debian, see https://bugs.debian.org/678630 -- but since > dh_installdocs doesn't have such an automatism, there's no need to > discuss the best solution for that. > >> CHANGES.md is used by a few projects, and it would be nice to have this file >> automatically picked up as an upstream changelog. > > I fully agree and have committed and pushed your changes. Thanks for > your contribution. Awesome, thanks :) > > I've also checked for occurrences of CHANGES.mdwn, CHANGES.markdown, > changelog.mdwn and changelog.markdown and found a few: > > CHANGES.mdwn = 0 Packages: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3ACHANGES.mdwn%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > CHANGES.markdown = 1 Package: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3ACHANGES.markdown%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > ChangeLog.mdwn = 0 Packages: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3AChangeLog.mdwn%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > ChangeLog.markdown = 0 Packages: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3AChangeLog.markdown%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > HISTORY.mdwn = 0 Packages: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3AHISTRORY.mdwn%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > HISTORY.markdown = 0 Packages: http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3AHISTRORY.markdown%20%3D%3D%3D/page_0 > > (I also checked some other capitalizations of "ChangeLog" and > "HISTORY" which seemed common or at least possible to me. No hits > there either.) > > Then I searched a little bit with DuckDuckGo and found indeed some > more occurrences, even by an DD: > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22ChangeLog.mdwn%22+-ikiwiki > > "history.mdwn" also has a few hits: > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22HISTORY.mdwn%22+-ikiwiki+-git-annex > > CHANGES.markdown even a few more: > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22CHANGES.markdown%22+-ikiwiki+-git-annex+-recentchanges > > Another common suffix for such files seem to be "rst" (IIRC > ReStructuredText coming from the Python world): > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22CHANGES.rst%22 > http://codesearch.debian.net/results/path%3ACHANGES.rst%20hange/page_0 > > The latter lists 60 current packages. So I'll soon add ".rst" as > changelog suffix to look for, but I'm rather hesitating to add ".mdwn" > or ".markdown". > > Regards, Axel > Good catch on those extra files. I would personally add .markdown, but not .mdwn (I did not even know this was a thing !) Cheers -- Jason Pleau From obamastudentforgivness at findsearchoptions.us Fri Mar 6 13:50:53 2015 From: obamastudentforgivness at findsearchoptions.us (ObamaStudentForgiveness) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 13:50:53 -0000 Subject: [debhelper-devel] Open Enrollment March 6, 2015 : Forgiveness and Discharge Program Message-ID: ***************************** The Student Forgiveness Program ***************************** Thursday: Open Enrollment March 6, 2015 Just enacted: Obama Student Loan Forgiveness Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program *Over 5 million Students Forgiven Call Now! (888) 451 8776 ***************************** Any balance on your student loan is eligible for complete forgiveness. ***************************** ( Former Students and Current Students ) What is the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program? The PSLF Program is intended to encourage individuals to enter and continue to work full-time (888) 451 8776 From obamastudentforgivness at findsearchoptions.us Fri Mar 6 13:50:54 2015 From: obamastudentforgivness at findsearchoptions.us (ObamaStudentForgiveness) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 13:50:54 -0000 Subject: [debhelper-devel] Open Enrollment March 6, 2015 : Forgiveness and Discharge Program Message-ID: ***************************** The Student Forgiveness Program ***************************** Thursday: Open Enrollment March 6, 2015 Just enacted: Obama Student Loan Forgiveness Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program *Over 5 million Students Forgiven Call Now! (888) 451 8776 ***************************** Any balance on your student loan is eligible for complete forgiveness. ***************************** ( Former Students and Current Students ) What is the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program? The PSLF Program is intended to encourage individuals to enter and continue to work full-time (888) 451 8776 From plugwash at p10link.net Sun Mar 8 02:27:28 2015 From: plugwash at p10link.net (peter green) Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 02:27:28 +0000 Subject: [debhelper-devel] Bug#780007: db5.3 build-depends on debhelper >= 9.20141221~ but jessie only has 9.20141022 Message-ID: <54FBB390.3090003@p10link.net> Package: db5.3 Version: 5.3.28-9 Severity: serious Tags: jessie x-debbugs-cc: debhelper at packages.debian.org The version of db5.3 that just migrated to testing build-depends on debhelper >= 9.20141221~ but jessie only has 9.20141022 . This means that db5.3 cannot be built in jessie. I notice that the recent debhelper uploads were made by Niels Thykier who is also a release manager. I don't know if that means there is an intention to unblock debhelper or not. From plugwash at p10link.net Sun Mar 8 02:27:28 2015 From: plugwash at p10link.net (peter green) Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 02:27:28 +0000 Subject: [debhelper-devel] Bug#780007: db5.3 build-depends on debhelper >= 9.20141221~ but jessie only has 9.20141022 Message-ID: <54FBB390.3090003@p10link.net> Package: db5.3 Version: 5.3.28-9 Severity: serious Tags: jessie x-debbugs-cc: debhelper at packages.debian.org The version of db5.3 that just migrated to testing build-depends on debhelper >= 9.20141221~ but jessie only has 9.20141022 . This means that db5.3 cannot be built in jessie. I notice that the recent debhelper uploads were made by Niels Thykier who is also a release manager. I don't know if that means there is an intention to unblock debhelper or not. From niels at thykier.net Sun Mar 8 10:29:01 2015 From: niels at thykier.net (Niels Thykier) Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 11:29:01 +0100 Subject: [debhelper-devel] Bug#780007: db5.3 build-depends on debhelper >= 9.20141221~ but jessie only has 9.20141022 In-Reply-To: <54FBB390.3090003@p10link.net> References: <54FBB390.3090003@p10link.net> Message-ID: <54FC246D.4090707@thykier.net> On 2015-03-08 03:27, peter green wrote: > Package: db5.3 > Version: 5.3.28-9 > Severity: serious > Tags: jessie > x-debbugs-cc: debhelper at packages.debian.org > > The version of db5.3 that just migrated to testing build-depends on > debhelper >= 9.20141221~ but jessie only has 9.20141022 . This means > that db5.3 cannot be built in jessie. > > I notice that the recent debhelper uploads were made by Niels Thykier > who is also a release manager. I don't know if that means there is an > intention to unblock debhelper or not. > > [...] The new version of debhelper got unblocked (see #780016). Thanks, ~Niels