[Debian-astro-maintainers] skyview_3.2.3+repack-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Ole Streicher]

Hi Thorsten,

as often it is difficult to get this from scientists, it was already
difficult to get a clear statement. However, I think I could include the
statement Tom McGlynn made to me in the copyright:

SkyView was prepared in part by me as a private citizen and as a federal
(US)  employee.  I assert no personal copyright and to the extent that
SkyView has been maintained as a part of my federal employment, it is in
the public domain with respect to US copyright protections see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government#Copyright_in_government_works_prior_to_1895.


Would that be OK for you?

Best regards

Ole

On 21.03.2017 17:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> 
> Hi Ole,
> 
> I am afraid a statement in a private email is not enough.
> Wouldn't it be possible for upstream to put this statement into the source tarball?
> 
> Thanks!
>  Thorsten
> 
> 
> 
> ===
> 
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
>