[Debian-ha-maintainers] DLM packaging

[Adrian Vondendriesch]

Am 30.08.2015 um 17:10 schrieb Ferenc Wagner:
> Christoph Berg <myon at debian.org> writes:
> 
>> Re: Ferenc Wagner 2015-08-29 <87oahpzrze.fsf at lant.ki.iif.hu>
>>
>>> [...]
>>> In the future this new dlm source package will produce some of the
>>> binaries previously produced by redhat-cluster.  What coordination does
>>> this require?
>>
>> If the new binaries are drop-in replacements for the old binaries
>> (most notably, have the same name), the only coordination needed is to
>> stop building them from redhat-cluster.
> 
> I think redhat-cluster should be dropped entirely, never to be uploaded
> into unstable again.  (Just like the openais package.)  DLM and
> gfs2-tools were split out of it and carried forward, while the rest
> (cman etc.) has been deprecated for years.

+1 for dropping the redhat-cluster entirely.

IMO DLM was the last reason to keep redhat-cluster.

> 
> The new DLM builds against the new Corosync, and LVM builds against
> those two.  I'll soon be testing the resulting clvm and cmirrord.
> 

Greetings,
 - Adrian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-ha-maintainers/attachments/20150830/9ab57b1d/attachment.sig>