[Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#804590: Bug#804590: redhat-cluster: build-depends on libcorosync-dev which is no longer built

[Christoph Berg]

Re: Ferenc Wagner 2016-01-16 <87k2n9ljk0.fsf at lant.ki.iif.hu>
> >        libpengine4-dev (>= 1.1.8+git20121010)
> >        libstonithd2-dev
> >        libtransitioner2-dev
> > pacemaker-mgmt: pacemaker-dev (>= 1.1)
> 
> Hmm, so that's why pacemaker hasn't migrated yet.  I also spent some
> time with the tracker, and couldn't find anything but
> https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=pacemaker with
> surprising statements like:
> 
> pacemaker is not yet built on amd64: 1.1.13-2 vs 1.1.14~rc4-2 (missing 16 binaries)

There's pacemaker bits still on that version:

$ rmadison -S pacemaker
...
libpengine4                | 1.1.13-2               | unstable          | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, s390x
...

Decrufting unstable should take care of that, but we should probably
get more (all?) packages in shape first to make the ftp-team work
easier on that.

> corosync is only in unstable (no testing version)

No idea about that one. I'd hope it resolved itself when the other
problems are gone. (Testing propagation of bin-nmued packages isn't
really visible on DDPO et al, and as it doesn't involve updating to a
new source package in testing, there's surely tons of special code for
it in britney, of which we might be hitting a dozen corner cases.)

> On the other hand, I really wonder why crmsh does not depend on
> pacemaker (only recommends it).  But we'll have to update it anyway.

I've just dirty-hacked its control file for the new pacemaker dev
packages, and it compiles. I'll upload it after some (superficial)
testing.

> By the way, Pacemaker 1.1.14 has been released, I'll fold it in
> shortly.  And we'll also have to switch gfs2-utils and ocfs-tools to the
> new stack, so that redhat-cluster can finally be removed from the
> archive.  If only dlm passed NEW already...

Would any of these be NEW as well? We can use the new dlm version to
upload more things to NEW. It's a bit inconvenient, but it should
speed up things.

Christoph
-- 
cb at df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/