[Debian-ha-maintainers] libqb priority

[Ferenc Wágner]

Christoph Berg <myon at debian.org> writes:

> Re: Ferenc Wágner 2016-06-20 <87porb51y5.fsf at lant.ki.iif.hu>
>
>> What do you think about renaming the branches to the DEP14 scheme also
>> used by Corosync and Pacemaker?  It's possible to go on without, but I
>> find it more natural for the upstream master to appear explicitly.
>
> I don't fancy it very much, but it's certainly preferable to use the
> same layout for all packages in the group, so please go ahead!

Done.  I found that the easy availability of upstream branches in
packaging repositories more than makes up for the longer branch names,
especially with TAB completion being around.  Hope it will work out for
you, too.  Patch communication gets more straightforward this way.
-- 
Feri