[med-svn] r5580 - trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg

[Nelson A. de Oliveira]

Author: naoliv
Date: 2010-12-10 01:55:49 +0000 (Fri, 10 Dec 2010)
New Revision: 5580

Modified:
   trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex
Log:
Fix for small typos


Modified: trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex
===================================================================
--- trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex	2010-12-10 01:39:04 UTC (rev 5579)
+++ trunk/community/papers/11_med-floss_luxemburg/paper-text.tex	2010-12-10 01:55:49 UTC (rev 5580)
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
 Medical health record applications in patient management
 are considered essential by most people.
 As a starting point GNUmed \cite{gnumed:2008} has been included into Debian.
-Howeverm there are numerous similar Free Software projects that try to
+However, there are numerous similar Free Software projects that try to
 solve more or less the same problem, but diverge in implementation details
 (programming language, database server, etc.), user interface (GUI or
 web application) and basic concepts of work flow and philosophy.  It
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
 The Debian Project is an association of individuals who share the
 intention to create the best possible free operating system.  This
 operating system is called Debian GNU/Linux, or simply
-Debian.  Everybody on the internet may initiate a site and
+Debian.  Everybody on the Internet may initiate a site and
 offer Debian packages. A local administrator
 has to decide, if this public source may be trusted.
 
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@
 Here, community-driven Linux distributions have an edge over 
 commercial Linux distributions. The number of users that may use
 a package, i.e. that pay back for the initial packaging effort,
-is not the dicisive factor for or against the maintenance of a
+is not the decisive factor for or against the maintenance of a
 package. One only needs a sufficiently large community of active
 package maintainers that give the confidence that the current
 infrastructure will be maintained, that new packages will 
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@
 there exist not supported  officially ports to other architectures and
 operating systems cores. Debian package management and distribution infrastructure
 has been adopted to other operating systems lacking an built-in equivalent,
-\emph{i.e.} Fink on MacOSX
+\emph{i.e.} Fink on Mac OS X
 (\printurl{fink.sourceforge.net}{fink.sourceforge.net}).
 
 % yoh: context below is not necessary about GNU and even more so
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@
 
 \DebianMed understands itself as a part of Debian.  The
 whole infrastructure around it will stay solid and does not drain extra
-for the DebianMed subcommunity. Admittedly, quite frequently the packaging
+for the \DebianMed subcommunity. Admittedly, quite frequently the packaging
 for \DebianMed does mean to provide packages that are of interest for
 e.g. Java programmers at large and this way, the Debian itself profits
 from its blends. Also, the separation of \DebianMed from e.g. Debian Science
@@ -710,9 +710,9 @@
 Blend -- is far more advanced.  There are several reasons for this
 fact.  The main reasons is an enormous availability of software for education
 and the fact that a Norwegian company paid developers to work full
-time on this project.  \DebianMed profited from thoese
+time on this project.  \DebianMed profited from those
 technologies and generalised some tools from Debian Edu for all Blends.
-Conversly, inside \DebianMed some new Blend tools were developed which
+Conversely, inside \DebianMed some new Blend tools were developed which
 now enhance the easy preparation of metapackages.
 
 Beyond the meta-packages, another service of the blends is the
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@
 
 
 %
-% Can this subsection go? OpenSuSE I do not know, but at least
+% Can this subsection go? openSUSE I do not know, but at least
 % Fedora is just plain excellent in exactly that, too, and it
 % has some other principles from which Debian can learn, still.
 %
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@
 That strong support within the community of users is essential for the
 development of software, for quality assurance, feedback on features,
 and not at least for the motivation of staff, all commercial
-distributors are well aware of.  E.g., RedHat has initiated Fedora as
+distributors are well aware of.  E.g., Red Hat has initiated Fedora as
 a free supplement to their commercial distribution.  It is this reason
 why \DebianMed is part of Debian and why groups external to the Debian
 society, like BioLinux\marginpar{ref for BioLinux}, are also keen on close collaborations with the
@@ -888,14 +888,14 @@
 %health care.
 
 All that said about Debian, at the end of the day it is the Freeness
-of the software that is important. OpenSuSE and Fedora, with
+of the software that is important. openSUSE and Fedora, with
 slight variations, have adopted much of the principles that Debian
 spearheaded. We still need to advance mechanisms like the packaging
 format conversion tool \packagealien}
 to work together as Linux users, maybe along
 the lines of the collaboration between Debian and Ubuntu. And we all,
 users, packagers and developers, need to understand more about cross
-platform developments that also includes MacOS X and Windows.
+platform developments that also includes Mac OS X and Windows.
 
 % FIXME: Should be moved to a "links section" where we also mention
 %        MedFloss.org