[med-svn] r19071 - in trunk/community/releasenotes: . jessie

Fri Apr 17 08:17:07 UTC 2015

Author: tille
Date: 2015-04-17 08:17:06 +0000 (Fri, 17 Apr 2015)
New Revision: 19071

Added:
   trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie/
   trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie/debian-med_blog.text
   trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie/release-notes-bug_782695.patch
Removed:
   trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie
   trunk/community/releasenotes/whats-new.dbk.patch
Log:
Create subdirectory Jessie and mention release-notes bug in file name


Deleted: trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie
===================================================================

--- trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie	2015-04-16 12:16:38 UTC (rev 19070)
+++ trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie	2015-04-17 08:17:06 UTC (rev 19071)
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-Twelve years ago we started with the goal to make Debian the
-distribution of choice for people working in medicine and biology.
-These days it is probably better to say Debian and its derivatives
-which are profiting from the work of the Debian Med team as well.
-
-Today we can say at least in the field of biology we have approached
-this goal since at least in the field of biology you will not find any
-other distributions with such a wide range of *tested* software
-coverage.
-
-The Debian Med team has succeeded in increasing the number of packages
-since the last Debian release (Wheezy) in several tasks.  For instance
-the number of packages that are useful for the maintenance of a medical
-practice has increased from 6 to 10 and the number of packages dealing
-with medical imaging was bumped from 71 to 92.  An important step for
-the acceptance of Debian in hospitals was done by getting GT.M packaged
-since this is the underlying database engine for VistA.  However, the
-largest step was (again) done in the bioinformatics task of Debian Med.
-While in Wheezy 172 packages for application in biology and the
-development of such applications existed we have now 283 packages in
-this field.
-
-Partly this number was not increased by packaging only new software
-but also by negotions with upstream authors to free their code and
-thus we were able to move packages from non-free to main Debian.  The
-most prominent package here is PHYLIP (and thus also its dependencies).
-
-However, we did not only care for the number of packages.  Specifically
-the biological software is used by scientists who depend on reproducible
-results in their work.  To guarantee this we applied Debian means to
-test the quality of packages.  On one hand this is done at package build
-time where we tried hard to run any available test suite provided by the
-upstream authors.  Since debhelper 9 does this automatically for
-standard test suites we bumped nearly all packages to this compatibility
-level.  We also tried hard to rebuild also those packages where the
-upstream code did not changed on one hand to profit from this testing on
-the other hand to possibly gain from new optimisation features of newer
-compilers.
-
-In addition to these tests at build time we tried hard to provide
-autopkgtests (DEP8) to a lot of packages.  This ensures that the package
-produces the same results even if prerequisites might have changed.
-This way we tried our best to support scientists in their attempt to
-get reproducible results.
-
-
-# enhanced teamwork
-
-# sprints

Copied: trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie/debian-med_blog.text (from rev 19069, trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie)
===================================================================
--- trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie/debian-med_blog.text	                        (rev 0)
+++ trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie/debian-med_blog.text	2015-04-17 08:17:06 UTC (rev 19071)
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+Twelve years ago we started with the goal to make Debian the
+distribution of choice for people working in medicine and biology.
+These days it is probably better to say Debian and its derivatives
+which are profiting from the work of the Debian Med team as well.
+
+Today we can say at least in the field of biology we have approached
+this goal since at least in the field of biology you will not find any
+other distributions with such a wide range of *tested* software
+coverage.
+
+The Debian Med team has succeeded in increasing the number of packages
+since the last Debian release (Wheezy) in several tasks.  For instance
+the number of packages that are useful for the maintenance of a medical
+practice has increased from 6 to 10 and the number of packages dealing
+with medical imaging was bumped from 71 to 92.  An important step for
+the acceptance of Debian in hospitals was done by getting GT.M packaged
+since this is the underlying database engine for VistA.  However, the
+largest step was (again) done in the bioinformatics task of Debian Med.
+While in Wheezy 172 packages for application in biology and the
+development of such applications existed we have now 283 packages in
+this field.
+
+Partly this number was not increased by packaging only new software
+but also by negotions with upstream authors to free their code and
+thus we were able to move packages from non-free to main Debian.  The
+most prominent package here is PHYLIP (and thus also its dependencies).
+
+However, we did not only care for the number of packages.  Specifically
+the biological software is used by scientists who depend on reproducible
+results in their work.  To guarantee this we applied Debian means to
+test the quality of packages.  On one hand this is done at package build
+time where we tried hard to run any available test suite provided by the
+upstream authors.  Since debhelper 9 does this automatically for
+standard test suites we bumped nearly all packages to this compatibility
+level.  We also tried hard to rebuild also those packages where the
+upstream code did not changed on one hand to profit from this testing on
+the other hand to possibly gain from new optimisation features of newer
+compilers.
+
+In addition to these tests at build time we tried hard to provide
+autopkgtests (DEP8) to a lot of packages.  This ensures that the package
+produces the same results even if prerequisites might have changed.
+This way we tried our best to support scientists in their attempt to
+get reproducible results.
+
+
+# enhanced teamwork
+
+# sprints

Copied: trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie/release-notes-bug_782695.patch (from rev 19069, trunk/community/releasenotes/whats-new.dbk.patch)
===================================================================
--- trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie/release-notes-bug_782695.patch	                        (rev 0)
+++ trunk/community/releasenotes/jessie/release-notes-bug_782695.patch	2015-04-17 08:17:06 UTC (rev 19071)
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+--- whats-new.dbk	2015-04-16 13:18:27.000000000 +0200
++++ whats-new.dbk_new	2015-04-16 13:29:25.125753555 +0200
+@@ -529,5 +529,19 @@
+     <ulink url="http://blends.debian.org/games/tasks/finest">Debian's finest games</ulink>.
+     </para>
+ </section>
++<section id="debian-med">
++    <title>News from Debian Med Blend</title>
++    <para>The Debian Med team has increased the number of packages in the
++    field of biology and medicine again by a large amount.  However, not only
++    the number of packages was increased but also the quality of packages in
++    terms of testing (at package build time as well as autopkgtest) was
++    enhanced and supports the demand of Debian Med in a scientific
++    environment to fullfill the request of scientists for reproducible
++    results.  These enhancements are reflected by version 2.0 of the Debian
++    Med metapackages.  Feel free to visit the
++    <ulink url="http://blends.debian.org/med/tasks">Debian Med tasks pages</ulink>
++    to see the full range of biological and medical software inside Debian.
++    </para>
++</section>
+ </section>
+ </chapter>

Deleted: trunk/community/releasenotes/whats-new.dbk.patch
===================================================================
--- trunk/community/releasenotes/whats-new.dbk.patch	2015-04-16 12:16:38 UTC (rev 19070)
+++ trunk/community/releasenotes/whats-new.dbk.patch	2015-04-17 08:17:06 UTC (rev 19071)
@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
---- whats-new.dbk	2015-04-16 13:18:27.000000000 +0200
-+++ whats-new.dbk_new	2015-04-16 13:29:25.125753555 +0200
-@@ -529,5 +529,19 @@
-     <ulink url="http://blends.debian.org/games/tasks/finest">Debian's finest games</ulink>.
-     </para>
- </section>
-+<section id="debian-med">
-+    <title>News from Debian Med Blend</title>
-+    <para>The Debian Med team has increased the number of packages in the
-+    field of biology and medicine again by a large amount.  However, not only
-+    the number of packages was increased but also the quality of packages in
-+    terms of testing (at package build time as well as autopkgtest) was
-+    enhanced and supports the demand of Debian Med in a scientific
-+    environment to fullfill the request of scientists for reproducible
-+    results.  These enhancements are reflected by version 2.0 of the Debian
-+    Med metapackages.  Feel free to visit the
-+    <ulink url="http://blends.debian.org/med/tasks">Debian Med tasks pages</ulink>
-+    to see the full range of biological and medical software inside Debian.
-+    </para>
-+</section>
- </section>
- </chapter>


