[Debian-med-packaging] dicomscope_3.6.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Barry deFreese bdefreese at debian.org
Thu Dec 17 22:13:09 UTC 2009


Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I thought the situation for the pdf was ok (andreas could you
> confirm?). We described what they are in :
> 
> $ cat doc-base.dscs
> $ cat doc-base.dsum
> 
> As for the .lut file. Those are DICOM files:
> 
> 
> $ dcmdump dicomscope-3.6.0/DICOMscope/lut/philips256us.lut
> 
> # Dicom-File-Format
> 
> # Dicom-Meta-Information-Header
> # Used TransferSyntax: LittleEndianExplicit
> (0002,0000) UL 194                                      #   4, 1
> MetaElementGroupLength
> (0002,0001) OB 00\01                                    #   2, 1
> FileMetaInformationVersion
> (0002,0002) UI [1.2.276.0.7230010.3.1.0.1]              #  26, 1
> MediaStorageSOPClassUID
> (0002,0003) UI [1.2.276.0.7230010.3.4.2139363186.15432.940262485.1] #
> 50, 1 MediaStorageSOPInstanceUID
> (0002,0010) UI =LittleEndianExplicit                    #  20, 1
> TransferSyntaxUID
> (0002,0012) UI [1.2.276.0.7230010.3.0.3.4.0]            #  28, 1
> ImplementationClassUID
> (0002,0013) SH [OFFIS_DCMTK_340]                        #  16, 1
> ImplementationVersionName
> 
> # Dicom-Data-Set
> # Used TransferSyntax: LittleEndianExplicit
> (2050,0010) SQ (Sequence with undefined length #=1)     # u/l, 1
> PresentationLUTSequence
>   (fffe,e000) na (Item with undefined length #=3)         # u/l, 1 Item
>     (0028,3002) US 256\0\12                                 #   6, 3
> LUTDescriptor
>     (0028,3003) LO [Difference between GSDF and Philips Standard
> Display Curve] #  58, 1 LUTExplanation
>     (0028,3006) US
> 0\22\43\65\87\109\131\152\174\195\217\238\260\281\302\324\345\366... #
> 512,256 LUTData
>   (fffe,e00d) na (ItemDelimitationItem)                   #   0, 0
> ItemDelimitationItem
> (fffe,e0dd) na (SequenceDelimitationItem)               #   0, 0
> SequenceDelimitationItem
> 
> 
> They were created by the dcmmklut program from DCMTK package.
> 
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Barry deFreese <ftpmaster at debian.org> wrote:
>> Hello maintainer,
>>
>> I am rejecting dicomscope for the following reasons:
>>
>> Several binary file types under the DICOMscope dir seem to have no source.  For examples docs/*.pdf, lut/*.lut (These might be OK). and others.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Barry deFreese
>> Debian FTP Assistant
>>
>>
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>> concerns.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
Ah, if the pdfs were generated from the source then that is OK and is my
mistake.  The lut files sound OK too.  If those were the only two binary file
types, we should be OK, just re-upload and I will fast-track it.

Sorry,

Barry deFreese
Debian FTP Assistant



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list