[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#643045: marked as done (altree: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b altree-1.0.1 gave error exit status 2)

[Charles Plessy]

Le Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:49:34PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :
> Your message dated Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:47:11 +0000
> with message-id <E1R8KtD-0006F4-RX at franck.debian.org>
> and subject line Bug#643045: fixed in altree 1.0.1-5
> has caused the Debian Bug report #643045,
> regarding altree: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b altree-1.0.1 gave error exit status 2
> to be marked as done.

>  altree (1.0.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * Upload source package without 3.0 (quilt) autopatch leftover.
>      Closes: #643045.

For the record here is the functional contents of the autopatch.

--- altree-1.0.1.orig/CUtils/const-c.inc
+++ altree-1.0.1/CUtils/const-c.inc
@@ -39,11 +39,11 @@ use ExtUtils::Constant qw (constant_type
 my $types = {map {($_, 1)} qw()};
 my @names = (qw());
 
-print constant_types(); # macro defs
+print constant_types(), "\n"; # macro defs
 foreach (C_constant ("ALTree::CUtils", 'constant', 'IV', $types, undef, 3, @names) ) {
     print $_, "\n"; # C constant subs
 }
-print "#### XS Section:\n";
+print "\n#### XS Section:\n";
 print XS_constant ("ALTree::CUtils", $types);
 __END__
    */
--- altree-1.0.1.orig/CUtils/const-xs.inc
+++ altree-1.0.1/CUtils/const-xs.inc
@@ -20,12 +20,14 @@ constant(sv)
            Second, if present, is found value */
         switch (type) {
         case PERL_constant_NOTFOUND:
-          sv = sv_2mortal(newSVpvf("%s is not a valid ALTree::CUtils macro", s));
+          sv =
+	    sv_2mortal(newSVpvf("%s is not a valid ALTree::CUtils macro", s));
           PUSHs(sv);
           break;
         case PERL_constant_NOTDEF:
           sv = sv_2mortal(newSVpvf(
-	    "Your vendor has not defined ALTree::CUtils macro %s, used", s));
+	    "Your vendor has not defined ALTree::CUtils macro %s, used",
+				   s));
           PUSHs(sv);
           break;
 	/* Uncomment this if you need to return IVs

Since it does not look essential, I decided to not commit it, as I did not know
if it is a wanted modification or just a forgotten experimentation.

Cheers,

-- 
Charles