[Debian-med-packaging] planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
andreas at an3as.eu
Wed May 2 11:23:59 UTC 2012
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:34:35AM +0200, Laszlo Kajan wrote:
> Ah, yes, about shared libraries. librarynamesoversion (or libraryname-soversion).
> * I think this should be applied to hmmer as well, hmmer (in testing) -> hmmer3, since that's not compatible with hmmer(<< 3).
> I have stuff that depends on hmmer (<<3), so I would need both hmmer(<<3) and hmmer/hmmer3(>=3) to coexist in one installation. Could this be
> resolved before the freeze?
I remember that we talked about this in Southport. Because you admitted
that you are using it yourself: Could you prepare a hmmer2 package that
fits your needs and let me check? I'm not sure how important it would
be to rename the current hmmer (== hmmer-latest) to hmmer3 (from my
perception it could remain unversioned, but you can decide on a way more
educated basis as an active user).
PS: Thanks for your MoM advertising to Maarten. I would also MoM-mentoring
about the hmmer-split if there is somebody who is actually willing to
do the work. Currently other things are higher on my agenda than doing
this myself completely.
More information about the Debian-med-packaging