[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#710205: Please binNMU njplot against Motif-using libvibrant6

Aaron M. Ucko ucko at debian.org
Mon Jun 3 22:13:13 UTC 2013


Julien Cristau <jcristau at debian.org> writes:

> That sounds bad.  Don't reuse library package names for different ABIs!

I know that's bad practice in general, but the name libvibrant6 last
appeared in sarge, which reached EOL five years ago, so I considered it
safe to reuse by now; I recall similar policies for C++ and Fortran ABI
transitions.

> The NBS cleanup won't happen before njplot is rebuilt anyway, so I don't
> care so much about that.

OK, thanks.  In that case, the only concern is a de facto conflict with
ncbi-tools-x11, since libvibrant6 and libvibrant6a aren't coinstallable.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list