[Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#510657: Bug#510657: sugar: /etc/dbus-1/system.d file needs alterations for fd.o #18961

[Simon McVittie]

On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 at 21:01:12 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Does that mean that I should not simply upload a fixed release to 
> unstable, but wait and depend on that newer release of dbus?
> 
> Or (looking at the changelog entry now) does it perhaps mean that my 
> change will work both now and (hopefully) with your new release of dbus, 
> but that my old sugar version will _not_ work with newer dbus?

I've tested lenny's sugar package with the D-Bus that's targeting lenny,
and it does work, so this bug obviously isn't particularly critical (in
particular, this bug doesn't block #503532 and is hence not RC for lenny).

I believe that all four combinations of (buggy, fixed) sugar and
(old, new) D-Bus should work in practice, so you shouldn't need to
introduce any versioned dependencies.

    Simon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20090104/5110fae7/attachment.pgp