[Debian-olpc-devel] Fwd: [SPAM] Re: sugar-speak-activity and licensing of PyAIML

[Luke Faraone]

On 08/14/2010 12:44 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> I would've suggested GPLv3 but it seems the author's original
> "license" and his intentions are more in line with BSD.
> 
> I hope nobody takes abusive advantage of this (like improving it
> and not sharing back).

Depends on what you consider "abuse". Generally, people who license
something as BSD / MIT / Expat and related permissive licenses
explicitly want people to use it however they please, as long as
attribution and disclaimer of liability (on the part of the author) is
provided.

-- 
╒═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╕
│Luke Faraone                          ╭Debian / Ubuntu Developer╮│
│http://luke.faraone.cc                ╰Sugar Labs, Systems Admin╯│
│PGP: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B  DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506          │
╘═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╛

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20100814/75ff3af0/attachment.pgp>