[Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#660178: Bug#660178: don't use xulrunner 10.0.2!

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On 12-02-19 at 03:09pm, lkcl luke wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> 
> wrote:
> 
> >> also the other bug (the original one) was related to jemalloc 
> >> (whatever that is), and disabling that sorts out the problem [only 
> >> to run smack into this focus manager one instead].
> >
> > Best if you could file a separate bugreport about that against 
> > libjemalloc-dev and then mention in this bugreport a reference to 
> > that other bugreport when you receive the bugnumber).
> 
>  hmm... it doesn't appear that libjemalloc1 is a dependency.  they may 
> have done something weird like include the source of jemalloc actually 
> inside gecko.

Then file it against xulrunner-dev.  My point is that you should file a 
bugreport against the package containing the bug, not the package(s) or 
other bugs affected by it.

It is easy to reassign a bugreport if filed against wrong package, but 
not so easy to distinguish and split multiple bugs posted into a single 
bugreport.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20120219/f1ae9775/attachment.pgp>