On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 19:32, Holger Levsen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:holger@layer-acht.org">holger@layer-acht.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
(*) of course, we could also try to persuade the release team that new<br>
upstream versions of sugar are desirable for lenny. I'm not sure I agree.<br>
(And new upstream versions are per default a "no" in a freeze, there are<br>
exceptions, but..)</blockquote><div><br>As I've said, it's been fixed in those packages, we're just awaiting a
release. Moreover, the fix was made to the older upstream version in git, so
new-upstream-version isn't a problem, we just need a @debian to upload. All I did was to run a regexp replacing the old path with the new one.<br><br>I see no reason why a new package release in lenny should be a problem; this is a packaging fix that does not modify any sugar code as far as I am aware. <br>
<br>-lf<br></div></div><br>