On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dr@jones.dk">dr@jones.dk</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I reverted because you updated from stable to unstable branch.<br>
<br>
Current packaging does not handle multiple concurrent branches. As long<br>
as we only handle a single branch, I want it to be the latest stable<br>
branch, and thus avoid unstable branches completely.<br>
<br>
I suggest leave the "trivial" packaging of core sugar parts to me for<br>
now. With "trivial" i mean things like keeping in sync with upstream.<br>
<br>
I suggest that you work on packaging more activities, and on finding and<br>
squashing bugs - also bugs in the core Sugar packages.</blockquote><div><br>Many of the bugs are fixed in later sugar releases, and the current upcoming sugar release (Jan 16, 0.83 Beta 1) is a feature freeze (and beta1), after which only bugfixes will be made (and is "almost" stable) until post-final release of the 0.84 series. <br>
<br>I will see what I can do to migrate some of the activities in Ubuntu but not Debian. <br></div></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Luke Faraone<br><a href="http://luke.faraone.cc">http://luke.faraone.cc</a><br>