<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Wade Brainerd <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wadetb@gmail.com">wadetb@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I for one will have a much easier time remembering what sugar-shell means, versus sugar-jarabe. <div><br></div><div>Personally I can't stand all these meaningless names, I currently have to go look at the glossary each time I need to know which version of Sugar has the activities. </div>
<div><br></div><div>At work I have often found that confusingly named packages tend to get adopted less easily than the sensibly named ones.</div></blockquote><div><br>Understandable. <br><br>What I was planning to do (I've yet to consult with the other maintainers on this) was to have "sugar" be a virtual package provided by "sugar-sucrose", so all you'd need to do would be to "apt-get install sugar" to get a fully-functioning sugar environment. It should be trivial to rename sugar to sugar-shell in Debian. <br>
</div></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Luke Faraone<br><a href="http://luke.faraone.cc">http://luke.faraone.cc</a><br>