Bug#595909: salome-dev: add path to adm_local files

[Adam C Powell IV]

On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:19 +0200, trophime wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:24 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 09:24 +0200, trophime wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 14:26 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > > Hello Christophe,
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 10:22 +0200, trophime wrote:
> > > > > Package: salome-dev
> > > > > Version: 5.1.3-11
> > > > > Severity: wishlist
> > > > > 
> > > > > It will be nice to include adm_local directory for each salome "base" modules
> > > > > in the salome-dev package. This will greatly simplify the developpement and
> > > > > packaging of new plugins since the configuration step almost refers to
> > > > > MODULE/adm_local.
> > > > > Otherwise we ave to include some MODULE_SRC in the src package for the plugins
> > > > > (see what I have done for salome-code-aster on svn debian science)
> > > > 
> > > > This is a good idea.  Right now the package puts the .m4 files all
> > > > together in one big salome.m4 in /usr/share/aclocal (because
> > > > "check_KERNEL.m4" and "check_GUI.m4" are far too generic names).  But
> > > > something like /usr/share/salome/[module]/adm_local or
> > > > just /usr/share/salome/adm_local could include more than just the .m4
> > > > files.
> > > > 
> > > > /usr/share/salome/adm_local is the easiest place to put these.  Will
> > > > that work for you?
> > > 
> > > I would rather try to stick as much as possible to the "original"
> > > installation. So my feelings are that adm_local from MODULE_SRC should
> > > be included in /usr/share/salome/MODULE_SRC.
> > 
> > It's pretty easy either way.  André, as someone closer to upstream, what
> > do you think makes more sense?  Right now, all of the adm_local files
> > install into /usr/adm_local, which violates the FHS.  Should they go
> > into a single directory under /usr/share/salome or into separate module
> > directories?
> > 
> > As I see it, the trade-off is:
> >       * Using MODULE_SRC eliminates module conflicts, of which there are
> >         many (see below)
> >       * As Christophe pointed out, YACS installs an adm_local directory
> >         in /usr/share/salome/HXX...SRC/adm_local so MODULE_SRC is more
> >         consistent with this
> >       * Using a single directory /usr/share/salome/adm_local makes it
> >         more obvious where the files are -- but modules which build and
> >         install later could overwrite the earlier-installed files
> > 
> > > Your idea of putting all m4 files together in a single
> > > directory /usr/share/salome is nice and much more elegant than mine.
> > 
> > They are actually all in a single *file* called salome.m4 which is
> > in /usr/share/aclocal with all of the other system .m4 files.
> > 
> > > However it seems to me that they are some m4 files sharing the same name
> > > but with slightly different in several MODULE_SRC. So I expect your
> > > solution to require a lot of chances... and it may have some drawback on
> > > the overall installation.
> > 
> > Indeed, the multiple different GUI checks are annoying; I think I
> > patched around that, so they all use the check from the GUI module.
> > 
> > > For instance I had to patch several m4 files
> > > for KERNEL, GUI, GEOM, MED and SMESH to package CodeAster and Saturne
> > > plugins and GHS3DPLUGIN and I wonder what are the impact of these
> > > changes to salome packaging?
> > 
> > Please send the patches and we'll incorporate them into Salomé, maybe
> > discussing some changes with you if there are any conflicts.
> 
> I attached the patches I used that code-aster, saturne and GHS3D
> plugins.

Thanks Christophe.  These are really good patches to check for the files
installed in their Debian locations.

I think blsurf, ghs3d and hexotic are all non-free, so I wasn't planning
to support them.  Does code-aster or saturne require any of them?

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20100914/09487548/attachment.pgp>