Bug#621037: scotch: missing inter-library links

Johannes Ring johannr at simula.no
Wed Apr 6 14:39:16 UTC 2011


On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct at debian.org> wrote:
> Thanks very much Johannes.
>
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 16:11 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct at debian.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Johannes,
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:37 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> >> Hi Adam,
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct at debian.org> wrote:
>> >> > Just put a fix in alioth, let me know if it gives you trouble.  I plan
>> >> > to upload within 4-5 hours.
>> >>
>> >> Sorry, I tried your fix but it gives me trouble because libptscotch is
>> >> linked against libscotch. This is the same problem as reported in
>> >> #612621.
>> >
>> > Right, I'm sorry about that.  I just copied the link commands from -4,
>> > assuming that the changed CFLAGS and LDFLAGS would make the difference.
>> >
>> >> It seems like the build-fixes.patch does not incorporate the
>> >> fixes from libptscotch.patch [1] in that bug report. Would you like me
>> >> to create a new patch against the latest git repository?
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=29;filename=libptscotch.patch;att=1;bug=612621
>> >
>> > Sure, is there anything else that needs to change?
>>
>> The attached patch fixes the problem for me.
>
> Thanks, this answers a couple of questions I had.
>
> One little detail: using $(AR) ... $(?) would include libptscotcherr.a
> in the ar command, wouldn't it?  Is that intended?

No, I guess not. Should "$(?)" be replaced by "$(LIBPTSCOTCHDEPS)
$(LIBSCOTCHDEPS)"?

Johannes





More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list