problem with cctbx

Radostan Riedel raybuntu at googlemail.com
Sun Aug 5 16:39:46 UTC 2012


On Sun, 05. Aug 15:07, Frédéric-Emmanuel Picca wrote:
> ok If this is the boost_python way, it is not a bad thinks to follow what they did.
> If people need to link against this scitbx_boost_python. this is ok.
> 
> now if I remember correctly their is a mecanism usng rtupdate that allow to switch from one version of libboost to the other depending on the python runtime.
> maybe it would be a good thing to mimic this also. I found only one ref for this [1].
> I also looked at the boost-1.49 source package and yes it is a good example for rtupdate set up.
> 
> /usr/share/python/runtime.d
> /usr/share/python/runtime.d/libboost-python1.49-dev.rtupdate
> /usr/share/python/runtime.d/libboost-mpi-python1.49-dev.rtupdate
OK I looked into it and it's better to do it with rtupdate. I'll remove the
*.links files later and I'll add an lintian override for that package.

Thanks

[1] http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/manoj-policy/x673.html



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list