cctbx debian package: new commit

[Radostan Riedel]

On Wed, 03. Oct 17:31, Baptiste Carvello wrote:
> Well, this use case is more difficult than FOX. Static libs might not
> work here, because you would end up with 2 copies of the cctbx libs
> loaded in the same process. I'm not sure boost-python can deal with
> that. I don't really see a way to support this use case in Debian
> without ABI stability.
I think we are on a dead end with cctbx here. I'm currently out of ideas.

> PS: I removed the cctbxbb mailing list from the CC. Did you add it on
> purpose?
I'm sorry I was not checking which list we were on and I assumed we're talking
on cctbxbb. I'm switching back to debian-science-maintainers.