Bug#791027: eclib: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Simon McVittie smcv at debian.org
Mon Aug 10 10:41:40 UTC 2015


On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:09:44 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
>  - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>    maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
>    break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
>    against these packages.

There don't seem to be any rdeps.

smcv at coccia:~$ dak rm -R -n eclib
Will remove the following packages from unstable:

     eclib | 20150510-2 | source
eclib-tools | 20150510-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
 libec-dev | 20150510-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
    libec2 | 20150510-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x

Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org>

------------------- Reason -------------------

----------------------------------------------

Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.



More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list