Bug#888560: mpfi dependencies inconsistency

Jerome BENOIT calculus at rezozer.net
Sat Jan 27 13:32:20 UTC 2018


Hello Tobias, thanks for the hint. I have just upload a corrected version. Jerome

On 27/01/18 17:19, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 01/27/2018 01:41 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello Vincent, thanks for your bugreport.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27/01/18 06:31, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> Package: src:mpfi
>>> Version: 1.5.3+ds-1
>>> Severity: serious
>>> Justification: Policy 7.2
>>>
>>> The current libmpfi-dev version is 1.5.3+ds-1+b1, which has:
>>>
>>> Depends: libmpfi0 (= 1.5.3+ds-1+b1), libmpfi-dev-common (= 1.5.3+ds-1), libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev
>>>
>>> but libmpfi-dev-common 1.5.3+ds-1 has:
>>>
>>> Recommends: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.3+ds-1)
>>>
>>> This is inconsistent.
>> This true.
>>
>> Do you have any idea from where comes the +b1 ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jerome
> 
> Hi,
> 
> the +b1 was appended to the binary version for the rebuild against libmpfr6. This is a matter of using (=${binary:Version}) vs. (=${source:Version}) in debian/control.
> 
> Best,
> Tobias
> 

-- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1528 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20180127/42165bf0/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the debian-science-maintainers mailing list