[debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#338376: marked as done (debiandoc-sgml-doc: FTBFS: debiandoc-sgml.en.pdf could not be generated properly)

Tue Jan 31 22:18:37 UTC 2006

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:44:13 +0100
with message-id <20060131214413.GA22236 at pluto>
and subject line \usepackage[force]{textcomp} side effects for debiandoc-sgml
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 22:42:27 +0000
>From stigge at antcom.de Wed Nov 09 14:42:27 2005
Return-path: <stigge at antcom.de>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EZyeB-0002Wp-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:42:27 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
	by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D1E700CB;
	Wed,  9 Nov 2005 23:40:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-9-173.mnet-online.de [82.135.9.173])
	by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6618312BE7D;
	Wed,  9 Nov 2005 23:42:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D62108B4FEE;
	Wed,  9 Nov 2005 23:42:26 +0100 (CET)
From: Roland Stigge <stigge at antcom.de>
To: submit at bugs.debian.org
Subject: debiandoc-sgml-doc: FTBFS: debiandoc-sgml.en.pdf could not be generated properly
Message-Id: <20051109224226.25D62108B4FEE at atari.stigge.org>
Date: Wed,  9 Nov 2005 23:42:26 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: debiandoc-sgml-doc
Version: 1.1.17
Severity: serious

Hi,

building the package debiandoc-sgml-doc in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:

=========================================================================
[...]
 Ok) (/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/tc/txaccent.mf
 Ok [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [27] [29])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/tc/txgen.mf
 Ok [100] [109] [98] [99] [108])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/tc/txsymbol.mf
 Ok [13] [18] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [28] [31] [32] [36] [39] [44]
[45] [46] [42] [47] [60] [61] [62] [77] [79] [87] [110] [91] [93] [94] [95]
[96] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137]
[138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149]
[150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161]
[162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [171] [172] [173] [174]
[175] [177] [176] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [187] [191] [214] [246])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/tc/txromod.mf
 Ok [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/tc/txrsuper.mf
 Ok [185] [178] [179] [170] [186])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/tc/txrfract.mf
 Ok [188] [189] [190]) ) ) )
(some charht values had to be adjusted by as much as 0.06952pt)
Font metrics written on tcrm1095.tfm.
Output written on tcrm1095.600gf (128 characters, 25772 bytes).
Transcript written on tcrm1095.log.
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /var/cache/fonts/ls-R unwritable.
mktexpk: /var/cache/fonts/pk/ljfour/jknappen/tc/tcrm1095.600pk: successfully generated.
debiandoc2latexpdf: ERROR: debiandoc-sgml.en.pdf could not be generated properly
debiandoc2latexpdf: rerun with the -v option to found out why
debiandoc2latexpdf: or check the log file debiandoc-sgml.en.log
make[1]: *** [all] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/debiandoc-sgml-doc-1.1.17'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
=========================================================================

However, debiandoc-sgml.en.pdf has been created and looks fine. The log file
only contains warnings, as far as I can see.

Thanks for considering.

--
DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite
http://darts.alioth.debian.org/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338376-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2006 21:47:30 +0000
>From tux-master at web.de Tue Jan 31 13:47:28 2006
Return-path: <tux-master at web.de>
Received: from smtp06.web.de ([217.72.192.224])
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F43LU-00077x-3v
	for 338376-close at bugs.debian.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:47:28 -0800
Received: from [84.180.144.248] (helo=pluto.sol)
	by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(WEB.DE 4.105 #340)
	id 1F43Kz-0008B2-00; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:46:57 +0100
Received: from jens by pluto.sol with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <tux-master at web.de>)
	id 1F43IL-0005nD-DB; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:44:13 +0100
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:44:13 +0100
From: Jens Seidel <jensseidel at users.sf.net>
To: 338376-close at bugs.debian.org
Cc: Frank =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCster?= <frank at kuesterei.ch>
Subject: Re: \usepackage[force]{textcomp} side effects for debiandoc-sgml
Message-ID: <20060131214413.GA22236 at pluto>
References: <20051109224226.25D62108B4FEE at atari.stigge.org> <86hda07kas.fsf at alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <86wthogssy.fsf at alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <861wzwgkko.fsf at alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20060101072407.GA7906 at dumbo.lan.aokiconsulting.com> <20060131183609.GA20599 at pluto> <86mzhcb2sm.fsf at alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <86mzhcb2sm.fsf at alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: tux-master at web.de
X-Sender: tux-master at web.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:44:25PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Jens Seidel <jensseidel at users.sf.net> wrote:
> 
> > debiandoc-sgml does no longer build Debian FAQ.
> >
> > $ latex /tmp/error.tex
> > This is e-TeX, Version 3.14159-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5)
> > entering extended mode
> 
> This is not the version in unstable, but in testing or sarge.  

Right, I use testing.
Sorry I was confused. I know that the bug was fixed but the result is a
non-working package on my system for PS and PDF files for all projects.

Let's hope that teTeX 3 migrates fast to testing.

> Hm.  Bad if that has the effect that debiandoc-sgml cannot be backported
> to sarge withouth changes.  Is this really a problem - there are also
> other alternatives, although less elegant.

A backporting is not very difficult and not very important. I'm closing
the bug ...

(Maybe I should reopen a few other bugs? Closing these afterwards makes
fun!!)

Jens