[Debichem-devel] making debichem Maintainer

[LI Daobing]

On 8/18/07, Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam at gmx.net> wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 18.08.2007, 12:35 +0200 schrieb Michael Banck:
> > OK, one more:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:20:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > <buxy> azeem: greylisting / spamassassin / clamav, the usual stuff but
> > >     there's still spam going through
> >
> > There's a good blog post by eddyp on how the Debian Games team got rid
> > of spam:
> >
> > http://ramblingfoo.blogspot.com/2007/08/how-did-debian-games-team-got-rid-of.html
> >
> > The most interesting point in this discussion is this:
> >
> > * anything that came from the BTS (there are some nice headers that the
> >   BTS puts) and was evaluated as ham with a score of 0 (there is a field
> >   for that, too - some field has Spam=No, Score=...) was allowed
> > * anything that came from the BTS that was Spam=No with a score above 0
> >   was held for moderation
> >
> > We should probably experiment a bit with that, but all in all, I think
> > it should be safe to have a list as Maintainer.  Daniel, do you have any
> > further objections?
>
> No. My only concern is the spam issue. I don't want to get an archive
> full of spam, that is unreadable. We can (and should) of course give the
> solutions you posted a try.
>
How about set a gmail address as the maintainer(we know that the
gmail's anti-spam is strong enough), then let gmail forward to a
private maillist.

-- 
LI Daobing