[Debichem-devel] Bug#455530: , 455532: Update to new goffice.

[Kumar Appaiah]

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:10:46PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Please consider transitioning gchempaint to use the new goffice in
> > unstable, as the old goffice0.4 (libgoffice-0-dev) is now in oldlibs.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have to reject your request. We already discussed this (with upstream
> too) and decided in accordance to upstream (who is also part of the
> goffice authors team) to not try to make this update with the 0.8
> series. That's BTW also the reason, why there is gofficce 0.4 in
> unstable [1].

Thanks for the explanation! :-)

> BTW: Why are you requesting this change?

Consider it RoQA? :-)

I am actually trying to help the QA/Release team to figure out which
of the oldlibs can be phased out eventually. This was just one of
those requests, as they are trying their best to prune the archives to
remove unneded stuff. In your case, I was just asked to find out if a
move is possible.

Thanks, again, for the explanation.

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debichem-devel/attachments/20071211/58094bd6/attachment-0002.pgp