[Debichem-devel] jgromacs package seems useful
daniel.leidert at wgdd.de
Thu May 17 12:58:56 UTC 2012
I now also added the javadoc part and used javahelper to do all the
things necessary to create the package. This should reduce package
maintenance. Hope this was ok with you.
PS: Auf die Männer ;)
Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2012, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Steffen Möller:
> On 05/17/2012 02:11 PM, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb "Steffen Möller":
> > [..]
> >>>> One thing about README.source; I think if you do something fancy with
> >>>> the original tarball, it would be best to supply a "get-orig-source"
> >>>> script for the modifications.
> >> Right. This is why I had time to address the packaging and you had not :o)
> > [..]
> >>>> I take you based you packaging on "jgromacs_v1_src.tgz"?
> >> Yes.
> >>>> I just renamed the "source" directory inside the jgromacs tarball to
> >>>> "jgromacs-1.0" here so far, and it build fine.
> >>>> You wrote you removed jama, I think it is fine to keep it even if it is
> >>>> not used in the build. Unless we have to remove it due to some
> >>>> licensing issues, which I guess is not the case?
> >> Hm. The debian/copyright file would need to be amended. IIRC correctly
> >> then my build instructions only take code from the jgromacs subfolder,
> >> i.e. the extra eyeballs on the Jama library remain established. That
> >> is the only bit that is important to me, really. Leave it in if you
> >> prefer, even though I had done that fancy GZIP=-9n while retaring.
> > Hi guys. I added a script to create the tarball and made some other
> > changes, which I thought should be done.
> Many thanks and regards
> Debichem-devel mailing list
> Debichem-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
More information about the Debichem-devel