From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Wed Jan 14 07:00:05 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Luca Falavigna) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:00:05 +0000 Subject: [Debichem-devel] libmstoolkit_73~svn-2_amd64.changes REJECTED Message-ID: As requested by lopippo === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Wed Jan 14 07:00:05 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Luca Falavigna) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:00:05 +0000 Subject: [Debichem-devel] libmstoolkit_73~svn-3_amd64.changes REJECTED Message-ID: As requested by lopippo === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. From ferseiti at br.ibm.com Wed Jan 14 17:47:20 2015 From: ferseiti at br.ibm.com (Fernando Seiti Furusato) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:47:20 +0000 Subject: [Debichem-devel] Bug#775362: ergo: FTBFS on ppc64el: test suite failure Message-ID: <20150114174720.22786.96311.reportbug@localhost> Source: ergo Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-powerpc at lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el Dear Maintainer, The package ergo fails to build from source on ppc64el. It actually times out at some point, in addition to the test failures. This looks similar to #756908 et al, but I am not sure if it is the same case, because when not using parallel=8, it builds successfully. The patch attached was a way I could find to make it use parallel=1 even though buildd is set to use 8 jobs. This is the content of the log for test script test_tdhf_dynamics.sh (one that fails): Testing H2 HF/6-311++Gss followed by TDHF electron dynamics Exception caught: error in SCF_restricted::write_density_to_file(): write_matrix_to_file failed for densityMatrix. Inline main molecule with 2 atoms. ERROR output file saved as ergoscf.out.error.tdhfdynamics The full log can be seen at: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ergo&arch=ppc64el&ver=3.4.0-1&stamp=1416077222 Let me know if you have any suggestions. Thanks and regards. Fernando -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ppc64el (ppc64le) Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-powerpc64le (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ppc64el.debdiff Type: text/x-diff Size: 1033 bytes Desc: not available URL: From olivier.sallou at gmail.com Fri Jan 30 18:24:37 2015 From: olivier.sallou at gmail.com (olivier sallou) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 18:24:37 +0000 Subject: [Debichem-devel] Bug#776662: jmol: Please upgrade Jmol to v13 Message-ID: Package: jmol Version: 12.2.32+dfsg2-1 Severity: wishlist X-CC: debian-med at lists.debian.org Dear maintainers, Could you please upgrade jmol to latest version (v13.x), I need a more recent version for up-to-come biojava package. Thanks Olivier -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mbanck at debian.org Fri Jan 30 18:32:28 2015 From: mbanck at debian.org (Michael Banck) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:32:28 +0100 Subject: [Debichem-devel] Bug#776662: Bug#776662: jmol: Please upgrade Jmol to v13 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20150130183228.GE20838@raptor.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> Hi, On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:24:37PM +0000, olivier sallou wrote: > Could you please upgrade jmol to latest version (v13.x), I need a more > recent version for up-to-come biojava package. Last time I looked I had an argument with JMol upstream about how to get their additional java add-on packages (jmolspec I think) packaged, which was not easy. I won't have a lot of time in the near future, but you would be certainly very welcome to join the JMol packaging and update it! Perhaps jmolspec (and others?) can be patched out as well. Michael