[From nobody Wed Jul  8 21:05:28 2009
Received: (at 534082-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2009 20:57:48 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 14; hammy, 77; neutral, 46; spammy, 8.
	spammytokens:0.993-1--H*r:sk:1MOeD3-,
	0.993-1--HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:1MOeD3-, 0.993-1--H*RU:sk:1MOeD3-, 
	0.987-1--H*r:sk:1MOeD0-, 0.987-1--H*RU:sk:1MOeD0-
	hammytokens:0.000-+--sk:build-d, 0.000-+--sk:buildd, 0.000-+--H*x:2.26.2,
	0.000-+--H*UA:2.26.2, 0.000-+--reopen
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
	RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: &lt;daniel.leidert@wgdd.de&gt;
Received: from 217-20-127-75.internetserviceteam.com ([217.20.127.75]
	helo=mail.wgdd.de) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from &lt;daniel.leidert@wgdd.de&gt;) id 1MOeD6-0005jP-0W
	for 534082-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:57:48 +0000
Received: from dslb-094-223-202-082.pools.arcor-ip.net ([94.223.202.82]:62983
	helo=leidi.wgdd.de) by mail.wgdd.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from &lt;daniel.leidert@wgdd.de&gt;) id 1MOeD0-00067r-Jk
	for 534082-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:57:42 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by leidi.wgdd.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1MOeD3-00016b-00
	for &lt;534082-done@bugs.debian.org&gt;; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:57:45 +0200
Subject: Bug#534082: openbabel: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency:
	libboost1.37-dev
From: Daniel Leidert &lt;daniel.leidert@wgdd.de&gt;
To: 534082-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:57:43 +0200
Message-Id: &lt;1247086663.7764.61.camel@leidi&gt;
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Lucas,

Thanks for your work. But the alternative to libboost1.37-dev:
libboost-dev is available since May, so it should have been available
during your rebuild in June too. I don't know, why the package failed to
build, but it doesn't fail here. I'm going to close this report. If you
still observe the problem, please reopen your report.

Regards, Daniel


]