IM networks [Was: [Debtags-devel] Protocols descriptions, ATM - HTTP,
tag question]
Torsten Marek
shlomme at gmx.net
Thu Nov 17 23:09:19 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Zini schrieb:
[...]
>>- From a strictly ontological view, the information about used protocol and im
>>network belongs into different facets. Once the first GoogleTalk clients appear
>
> [...]
>
>>instant-messaging::aim (Implies: protocol::oscar)
>>instant-messaging::icq (Actually Implies: protocol::oscar, which is the same as
>>ICQv{7,8,9}. Only really old clients would be protocol::icq)
>>instant-messaging::jabber (Implies: protocol::jaber, [protocol::xmpp])
>>instant-messaging::jahoo (Implies: protocol::yahoo)
>>instant-messaging::msn (Implies: protocl::msn)
>
>
> Right. So I'm definitely in favour of merging aol and icq in protocol,
> but only after we found a place to put these new instant-messaging tags,
> as currently the protocol facet is the only way of finding the right
> instant messaging clients one needs.
>
>
What about putting this in the works-with facet? The descriptions suggest that
it works-with can be understood in quite a wide way. The tags would then be
works-with::im:aim - AIM
works-with::im:icq - ICQ
works-with::im:jabber - Jabber
works-with::im:msn - MSN
works-with::im:yahoo - Yahoo!
best regards
Torsten (whose libapt-front-python development is currently on hold do to
libstdc++6 allocator transition...)
- --
Torsten Marek <shlomme at gmx.net>
ID: A244C858 -- FP: 1902 0002 5DFC 856B F146 894C 7CC5 451E A244 C858
Keyserver: subkeys.pgp.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDfQ2ffMVFHqJEyFgRAiIGAJ0ZX5cCLFWa9G6w6O6JkVk8WaXqIwCgp5b+
7JfQnwSbuyRywYOwIUrKNa0=
=VimI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Debtags-devel
mailing list