[proposal] Simplified junior tags & debtags-based
replacement for metapackages
Enrico Zini
enrico at enricozini.org
Sun Apr 2 17:00:11 UTC 2006
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:02:09PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Definitely I agree, I also think "suite" suites (:)) more than "task",
> but the clash with dak terminology still holds. Maybe explaining in
> some document the difference of the two uses of "suite" would be
> enough to avoid confusion.
Oh, well, I don't care too much about name clash: they're sometimes
impossible to avoid. 'tags' was used before debtags (I don't remember
by what, but it might be mentioned in [1]) and is now used by the BTS
usertags. And then you have HTML tags.
My feeling is that if you want to be unique these days you risk ending
up with either a long name or a meaningless name.
Ciao,
Enrico
[1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/deb-usability-list/2003-May/000139.html
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <enrico at debian.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/attachments/20060402/d8fac569/attachment.pgp
More information about the Debtags-devel
mailing list