[Foo2zjs-maintainer] Introducing debconf

[Luca Bedogni]

On Saturday 04 August 2007, Luca Bedogni wrote:
> On Saturday 04 August 2007, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 06:15:58 pm me at lucabedogni.it wrote:
> > > On Saturday 04 August 2007, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 07:53:54 am me at lucabedogni.it wrote:
> > > > > Hi mates
> > > > >     since I have some spare time, i decided to wrote a first
> > > > > revision of a debconf script for installing the firmware.
> > > > > It's based on debconf, and it's now present on the svn.
> > > > > It's a little bit raw i think, need more testing of course, and
> > > > > works only for Hp Lj 10xx (i don't have others printers to test it,
> > > > > but it won't work anyway :)).
> > > > >
> > > > > So, this is just and idea, if we want debconf, we can improve this
> > > > > scripts, and test it putting a new package in exprimental.
> > > > > If we don't want debconf, we can delete this files, but had to find
> > > > > another way to fix #419038.
> > > >
> > > > Although I like the idea of easing the installation process a lot, I
> > > > would still object against it. The firmware blurb is non-free and if
> > > > we want to got hat way, we would need to say so in the debconf
> > > > question. I am very much in favour of providing a working getweb
> > > > script (or maybe an own one) and explaining the use in a manpage and
> > > > in the
> > > > README.Debian file. Sorry for that.
> > > > By the way, it would be nice to know, if the current foo2zjs in
> > > > experimental is working, because I would like to update the current
> > > > unstable version and get something working into testing.
> > >
> > > Ok, so we had 2 principal solutions:
> > > 1- Add the non-free notification to debconf (should we ship foo2zjs in
> > > contrib)
> >
> > I do want to keep the package in main. :)
>
> /me too :)
>
> > > 2- Write a barely-new getweb script, and mention it in README.Debian.
> > >
> > > 1- This is simple adding a template in debian/templates and call it
> > > from config, but according to policy, we had to ask _only_ important
> > > questions with debconf. This is not, because someone could install the
> > > firmware by hand.
> > > 2- This should be not really difficult, i think we can look at the
> > > makefile and add to the getweb script some things like install-hotplug
> > > and install, for automatizing the process.
> > >
> > > After that, my "vote" goes to 2.
> >
> > I vote for 2 as well :)
>
> So 2 won (sorry Michael, but also if you'd voted for 1, 2 wins anyway :))
>
> > Did you have a chance to test the current experimental package? Does it
> > work?
>
> Well, I've tested it some days ago (a week i remember), and it worked fine.
> Anyway, I've not a really clean environment (some foo2zjs file shipped from
> the original tarball), so I think I'd to do more testing.

Well, tested that more, and it think it definitively works :)

> > Cheers
> > Steffen
>
> Cheers

Cheers
-- 
Debian Powered GNU/Linux User #373118
Bedogni Luca - 	Blog | http://blog.lucabedogni.it
		        Site | http://www.lucabedogni.it
Debianizzati - www.debianizzati.org | Founder Member
--
A good programmer is someone who looks both ways 
before crossing a one-way street. 
				Doug Linder