Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4

[Julien Cristau]

The whole point of this transition is that the rebuilt library is not compatible. So it can't provide the old name and there can't be a transitional package.

Cheers
Julien

On August 9, 2015 8:25:46 AM CEST, Eriberto Mota <eriberto at debian.org> wrote:
>Hi Julien,
>
>I applied your patch and I updated some symbols. However, I added a
>binary libafflib0 as transitional package to avoid break some
>packages.
>Is there any problem in doing that?
>
>I attached a debdiff between afflib-3.7.6-4 and 3.7.6-5.
>
>Thanks a lot in advance.
>
>Regards,
>
>Eriberto
>
>
>2015-08-06 19:14 GMT-03:00 Eriberto <eriberto at eriberto.pro.br>:
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your quick reply. I will wait 2 days to fix some
>> symbols for ports.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Eriberto
>>
>>
>> 2015-08-06 18:08 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau <jcristau at debian.org>:
>>> On Thu, Aug  6, 2015 at 22:55:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug  6, 2015 at 17:44:32 -0300, Eriberto wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hum... Sorry, can you detail for me how to proceed? Need I use
>v5?
>>>> >
>>>> Yes, something like the patch below.
>>>>
>>> ... except with the .symbols files fixed to refer to libafflib0v5
>>> instead of libafflib0; sorry about that.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Julien

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/forensics-devel/attachments/20150809/a70e0ad0/attachment.html>