[Freedombox-discuss] Roadmap proposal

[Matt Joyce]

With ChaosVPN we've been doing both ipv6 and ipv4.  What I have recently
seen as a problem at home was choosing private ipv4 allocations for my
openstack testing conflicting with allocated chaosvpn space.

ipv6 would definitelty have been better at this.

however in a mesh / p2p environment you are going to want to be pushing data
direct between nodes at time.  which will require a vpn... otherwise some
folks will end up stuck in ipv6 tunnels.

-matt

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Samuel Gyger <samuel at gyger.at> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 16:29, James Vasile <james at hackervisions.org>
> wrote:
> > So if we are starting at the beginning, we need a device that can
> > replace people's routers and then we can layer on the freedom bits.
>
> As we talk about router, I would suppose don't build on IPv4 anymore.
> We should build on the future, should use the possibilities that we
> get with IPv6, removing all the problems with NATs etc. Which also
> redefines the thing a router should do here.
>
> Samuel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20110217/c4eae615/attachment.htm>