[Freedombox-discuss] Other tit-bits.

[Jim Tarvid]

Doesn't this criteria suggest that the "plug" is an inadequate hardware
foundation rather than JVM is too big?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 03:02:27AM -0800, Weaver wrote:
> > There are one or two other projects about that seem ready made for the
> > Freedombox.
> >
> > Not just as programmes, but as viable, even viral means of distribution.
> >
> > This URI is far too long so I shortened it.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/bp5c6mv
>
> Please don't post shortened URLs without even offering a summary.
>
> YaCy has already been discussed several times on the list.
> The show-stopping problem I see is that it's difficult to shoehorn
> a JVM and an application with already considerable footprint into
> a pretty small ARM embedded which must also run other daemons.
>
> I have the impression that anything relying on Java would be
> a disqualification criterium for FreeedomBox minimal functionality
> (Tier 0?) as it has to run on an embedded footprint. It would
> probably be ok for the higher tiers, particularly that it has
> been already packaged for Debian
>
> http://yacy-websuche.de/wiki/index.php/En:DebianInstall
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
>



-- 
Kindness Works!
Rev. Jim Tarvid, PCA
12897A Grays Pointe Road, Fairfax, Va 22033
703-594-7297
38.8778239, -77.392696
http://ls.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20111130/274a6c74/attachment.html>